On 04-11-13 17:58, Matt . wrote:
> My install is finally working but cannot send emails, it seems that the
> dbmail-smtp is nowhere to find, also not when I do a locate on it.
>
> What could be this problem and where can I find the file ?
>
> Nov 4 16:48:11 dbmail-01 postfix/pipe[10605]: D170961
That is indeed what I use now, seams to be faster as it's not a running
service with 1000's of threads.
2013/11/5 Thomas Raschbacher
> On 2013-11-04 17:58, Matt . wrote:
>
>> My install is finally working but cannot send emails, it seems that
>> the dbmail-smtp is nowhere to find, also not when
On 2013-11-04 17:58, Matt . wrote:
My install is finally working but cannot send emails, it seems that
the dbmail-smtp is nowhere to find, also not when I do a locate on it.
What could be this problem and where can I find the file ?
Nov 4 16:48:11 dbmail-01 postfix/pipe[10605]: D170961432:
to=
My install is finally working but cannot send emails, it seems that the
dbmail-smtp is nowhere to find, also not when I do a locate on it.
What could be this problem and where can I find the file ?
Nov 4 16:48:11 dbmail-01 postfix/pipe[10605]: D170961432:
to=, relay=dbmail-smtp, delay=0.09,
dela
Hi all,
Today, I had an email deferred in local queue because of error
returned by dbmail-smtp
Whenever MTA tries to deliver, dbmail/smtp keeps returning error, so
that MTA could not send this email and keeps it in queue to retry.
Error shown that this is caused by invalid byte sequence for encodi
Hello Paul,
2224 fixes this :)
Best,
Adam
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Some addition debugging info is required here.
Adam Kosmin wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm seeing this in my logs now that I've updated to version 2221. Does
anyone know of any changes that would affect a mailbox with its
permissio
Some addition debugging info is required here.
Adam Kosmin wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm seeing this in my logs now that I've updated to version 2221. Does
> anyone know of any changes that would affect a mailbox with its
> permission attribute set to a value of 1?
>
> Aug 4 18:35:28 vtdbma
Hello everyone,
I'm seeing this in my logs now that I've updated to version 2221. Does
anyone know of any changes that would affect a mailbox with its
permission attribute set to a value of 1?
Aug 4 18:35:28 vtdbmailarc dbmail/smtp[8556]: Error db.c,
db_find_create_mailbox: could not create
Leif,
thanks for investiation.
> Based on the link with the logs and your message in question I tried to
> reproduce this issue under valgrind and was unable to with 2.1.7
> dbmail-smtp as well as the retrival of the message after storage matches
> the original. So I would guess that this sig9 i
Martin,
Based on the link with the logs and your message in question I tried to
reproduce this issue under valgrind and was unable to with 2.1.7
dbmail-smtp as well as the retrival of the message after storage matches
the original. So I would guess that this sig9 is somewhere in your exim
chain o
Hi,
dbmail-smtp gets killed by signal 9 with a specific mail.
All other mails get in there boxes, only this on not, bug?
006-07-27 12:37:08 1G63Eq-0004gv-Ji ** [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> R=localuser T=transport_dbmail_p: Child
process of transport_dbmail_p transport (running command
>
> > If it does run,
> >does dbmail-smtp run from the command line?
> >
> >
> Kinda. I tried:
>
> dbmail-smtp -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Then I entered a single line of text:
> test
>
> and hit CTRL and D.
Run "which dbmail-smtp" and/or "find / -name dbmail-smtp" and make
sure you're not
Daniel Kasak wrote:
>> If it does run,
>> does dbmail-smtp run from the command line?
>>
>>
> Kinda. I tried:
>
> dbmail-smtp -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Then I entered a single line of text:
> test
>
> and hit CTRL and D.
>
> In the syslog, I got:
> Nov 9 09:58:29 [dbmail/smtp] main(): mim
Daniel Kasak wrote:
Greetings.
I'm unable to get DBMail & sendmail talking to each other.
I've followed instructions at
http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=sendmail_howto
I took the 2nd route:
define(`LOCAL_MAILER_PATH’, `/usr/sbin/dbmail-smtp’)dnl
define(`LOCAL_MAILER_ARGS’, `dbmail
Jesse Norell wrote:
---
[DBMAIL]
host=localhost
sqlsocket=/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock
user=dbmail
pass=dbmailpass
db=dbmail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You do still have TRACE_LEVEL in [DBMAIL], for clarity?
Yep.
Nope, dbmail-util, sorry.
OK. dbmail-util -a gives:
---
Opening conne
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 09:12 +1100, Daniel Kasak wrote:
> Jesse Norell wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> > Ok, looks like it is finding and reading your dbmail.conf,
> >so back to your original problem (which I thought was being
> >able to find/read the file):
> >
> >[dbmail/smtp] main(): error reading alt
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 22:56 +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote:
> Jesse Norell wrote:
>
> > And make sure not to leave dbmail.conf mode 666. You want
> > to run dbmail under its own userid, and have the file mode 600.
>
> Hear, hear. And run dbmail-smtp setuid!
>
Even better, have the file owned
Jesse Norell wrote:
Hello,
Ok, looks like it is finding and reading your dbmail.conf,
so back to your original problem (which I thought was being
able to find/read the file):
[dbmail/smtp] main(): error reading alternate config file
Without looking at the source to see where that message is
Jesse Norell wrote:
> And make sure not to leave dbmail.conf mode 666. You want
> to run dbmail under its own userid, and have the file mode 600.
Hear, hear. And run dbmail-smtp setuid!
--
Paul Stevens
Daniel,
Are you running sendmail in a chroot environment, or is sendmail running it's
mailers in a chroot environment? I know from painfull experience postfix makes
it *very* easy to run mailers and transports chroot.
Daniel Kasak wrote:
> dkasak dbmail # strace dbmail-util -a 2>&1 | grep dbmail
Hello,
Ok, looks like it is finding and reading your dbmail.conf,
so back to your original problem (which I thought was being
able to find/read the file):
[dbmail/smtp] main(): error reading alternate config file
Without looking at the source to see where that message is
printed, perhaps your
Jesse Norell wrote:
Hello,
Don't know where Gentoo expects it; Debian would be looking
for /etc/dbmail/dbmail.conf, and the default location is
/etc/dbmail.conf. If you chmod 600, make sure the file is
owned by whatever user dbmail is running as (and you'd do
well to make sure that's not root
Hello,
Don't know where Gentoo expects it; Debian would be looking
for /etc/dbmail/dbmail.conf, and the default location is
/etc/dbmail.conf. If you chmod 600, make sure the file is
owned by whatever user dbmail is running as (and you'd do
well to make sure that's not root). If you still can't
Greetings.
I'm unable to get DBMail & sendmail talking to each other.
I've followed instructions at
http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=sendmail_howto
I took the 2nd route:
define(`LOCAL_MAILER_PATH’, `/usr/sbin/dbmail-smtp’)dnl
define(`LOCAL_MAILER_ARGS’, `dbmail-smtp -d $u’)dnl
in m
Christian, this sounds like a bug. Please file a report so we can schedule a
fix.
Christian G. Warden wrote:
> I'm currently using dbmail-smtp to deliver messages directly to a
> specified mailbox using dbmail-smtp -m MAILBOX -u USERNAME. This
> bypasses DBMail's alias lookups. Here's what it u
I'm currently using dbmail-smtp to deliver messages directly to a
specified mailbox using dbmail-smtp -m MAILBOX -u USERNAME. This
bypasses DBMail's alias lookups. Here's what it used to do:
main(): using SPECIAL_DELIVERY to usernames
dbmysql.c,db_query: executing query [SELECT user_idnr FROM us
Lorna,
Check how dbmail-smtp is called. This was probably setup in master.cf.
Does /etc/dbmail.conf exist at all? That is: does 'dbmail-users -l' work?
If so, then: Is /etc/dbmail.conf readable for the user that is running
dbmail-smtp?
Humberto Valiente wrote:
Usa esto como guia para conf
Usa esto como guia para configurar postfix con mailscanner
http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/install/postfix.shtml
> Hello!
>
> I have this error in my logs:
> dbmail/smtp[2910]: main(): error reading alternate config file
> [/etc/dbmail.conf]
>
> It happened after I installed MailScanner
Hello!
I have this error in my logs:
dbmail/smtp[2910]: main(): error reading alternate config file
[/etc/dbmail.conf]
It happened after I installed MailScanner + ClamAV + SpamAssassin
I have WhiteBox, kernel 2.4, Postfix, SquirrelMail, DBMail (of course!)
Behaviour:
The mails do not get deliver
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:43:25 +1300, Mark Mackay - Orcon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've disabled the quota checks in a 1.x version and it has produced a major
> speed gain in the database. Previously our database was spiking to high
> loads doing the SUM() calcs, so I wouldn't underestimate the
#x27;Ilja Booij'; 'DBMail mailinglist'
Subject: RE: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp slow
> I don't think that disabling quota checks will get you any real speed
> improvement. The real speed issues here are in the starting of the
> dbmail-smtp process, setting up database connection etc.
>
> I don't think that disabling quota checks will get you any real speed
> improvement. The real speed issues here are in the starting of the
> dbmail-smtp process, setting up database connection etc.
>
> As Paul indicated, we can get better performance if we enable
> dbmail-smtp to receive several
> I don't think that disabling quota checks will get you any real speed
> improvement. The real speed issues here are in the starting of the
> dbmail-smtp process, setting up database connection etc.
The quota is calculated by sum()ing the sizes of all messages with
status < 3 (iirc), so not c
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 14:52:56 +0400, Mikhail Ramendik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Paul J Stevens wrote:
>
> > Of course, this whole setup is why Aaron wrote the lmtp daemon which
> > fixes this for mta fed messages. For
> > importing existing mailboxes, no such speedups are currently
>
Hello,
Paul J Stevens wrote:
> Of course, this whole setup is why Aaron wrote the lmtp daemon which
> fixes this for mta fed messages. For
> importing existing mailboxes, no such speedups are currently
> available. We need a tool (resurrect it
> actually), that will bypass many of the checks db
Mikhail Ramendik wrote:
Hello,
It's somewhat strange, but mbox2dbmail is definitely slow on a large
mail folder. Less than 2 mesages per second.
There is no significant cpu usage, and large iowait time, so apparently
it's all disk waiting. But the disk is not that slow (Seagate Barracuda
7200.7
Hello,
It's somewhat strange, but mbox2dbmail is definitely slow on a large
mail folder. Less than 2 mesages per second.
There is no significant cpu usage, and large iowait time, so apparently
it's all disk waiting. But the disk is not that slow (Seagate Barracuda
7200.7).
I suspected slow Pytho
" ${recipient} >>
/tmp/postfix-test.out
Jn
Original Message
From: David Young
To: "DBMail mailinglist"
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp error
Sent: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:53:58 -0700
> Fixed!
>
> Jesse, your solution(s) seem to have fixed the problem. Single
colons are introduced as
the separator and is there a way to verify what's being passed?
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse Norell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 7:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp error
>
> Hello,
>
> Try one
>
To: "DBMail mailinglist"
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 2:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp error
> There are a few ways to get 'command usage error' from dbmail-smtp:
>
> 1. use dbmail-smtp -t and use the -t option twice, like so:
> dbmail-smtp -t deliv
the issue you see as well).
It might be worth pulling amavis out for testing.
Jn
Original Message
From: David Young
To: "DBMail mailinglist"
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp error
Sent: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 16:12:14 -0700
> ok, i seem to have figured out a way to reproduc
ng a
company mailing list where all recipients belong to the same domain. Can
someone please help or let me know what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks,
David
- Original Message -
From: "Ilja Booij" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "DBMail mailinglist"
Sent: Wednesday, September
ng a
company mailing list where all recipients belong to the same domain. Can
someone please help or let me know what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks,
David
- Original Message -
From: "Ilja Booij" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "DBMail mailinglist"
Sent: Wednesday, September
]>
To: "DBMail mailinglist"
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp error
> Hmm,
>
> that looks alright.. strange
>
> can you add -v to the command, like this:
>
> dbmail unix- n n - - pipe -
CTED]>,
relay=dbmail, delay=25, status=bounced (command line usage error. Command
output: *** DBMAIL: dbmail-smtp version $Revision: 1.46 $ (c) 1999-2003
IC&S, The Netherlands Usage: /usr/local/sbin/dbmail-smtp -n [headerfield]
for normal deliveries (default: "deliver-to")
/usr/loca
riginal Message -
From: "Ilja Booij" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "DBMail mailinglist"
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 7:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp error
There's probably an error in your dbmail-smtp command. Please show us
your entry for dbmail-smtp in
il mailinglist"
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 7:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp error
> There's probably an error in your dbmail-smtp command. Please show us
> your entry for dbmail-smtp in master.cf (in the postfix config)
>
> Ilja
>
> David Young wrote:
>
&
mail I believe.
Thanks,
David
Aug 29 04:43:35 trinity postfix/pipe[19867]: C3B60D00F: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=dbmail, delay=1,
status=bounced (command line usage error. Command output: *** DBMAIL: dbmail-smtp version $Revision: 1.46 $
(c) 1999-2003 IC&S, The Netherlands Usage
e usage error. Command
output: *** DBMAIL: dbmail-smtp version $Revision: 1.46 $ (c) 1999-2003 IC&S,
The Netherlands Usage: /usr/local/sbin/dbmail-smtp -n [headerfield] for
normal deliveries (default: "deliver-to")/usr/local/sbin/dbmail-smtp -m
"mailbox" -
Dear list folk,
I'm running dbmail 2.0rc4 with Exim 4 in a cygwin environment. Slightly
outdated, I know, but it's was a bitch to compile in cygwin :/ I appolgize
if this is something that has been fixed since then.
In my setup I have Exim resolve all alias etc. before they are injected into
dbma
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 10:10:43AM +1300, Mark Mackay - Orcon wrote:
> For mailbox delivery it must be a username, not an email alias - from
> memory.
>
> I don't know whether mailbox selection is enabled via alias expansion yet --
> may need to wait for the Sieve work to be complete.
Right. Use
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of nerVo
> Sent: Wednesday, 4 February 2004 9:43 a.m.
> To: dbmail@dbmail.org
> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp and imap folders
>
> Hm...
> No more success...
>
> cat mail_file | dbmail-smtp -d [EMAIL PROTECTED] -m temp
> ---> Recipi
ver mail to my inbox
>
> David
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "nerVo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 1:04 PM
> Subject: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp and imap folders
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm using DBMail 1.
Hm...
No more success...
cat mail_file | dbmail-smtp -d [EMAIL PROTECTED] -m temp
---> Recipient names must be specified
---> Recipient names must be specified
(** yes, two times**)
Nor using "temp" or -u instead of -d, or both.
Perhaps my folder "temp" has an another syntax or something like th
You'll hate this... The '-m' option has to appear *after* the -d option:
cat mail_file | dbmail-smtp -d [EMAIL PROTECTED] -m temp
-fr.
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 21:04:12 +0100
nerVo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using DBMail 1.2.3 on FreeBSD 5.2.
> Due to the lack of documentation, i c
This works for me
|/usr/local/sbin/dbmail-smtp -m INBOX -u dschultz
to deliver mail to my inbox
David
- Original Message -
From: "nerVo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 1:04 PM
Subject: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp and imap folders
> Hello,
&
Hello,
I'm using DBMail 1.2.3 on FreeBSD 5.2.
Due to the lack of documentation, i can't find any information about the usage
of th "-m" parameter to deliver a mail in a special imap folder.
if i just cat a mail, with a pipe on dbmail-smtp like that :
cat mail_file | dbmail-smtp -d [EMAI
Hi,
It's a while since I've used dbmail, but I'm building a new system and
thought I'd use the change to go back to dbmail... 2.0rc1 is available, so
I'm gonna try to go with that rather than install somthing that is about
to be obsolited...
Weird problems seem to plague me though!!!
Using Postg
hmhm... verry strange 0_o
what i did:
i followed Pauls instructions and viewed the syslog after i linked the
dbmail-binaries against mysql 4.0.13 (like i did the first time i
installed it)
but not with
./build.sh
./instal-dbmail.sh
but with
./configure --with-mysql --with-ssl
make
cp dbmail-sm
darookee wrote:
i now linked dbmail against mysql 3.23.57 but it has the same effect...
makes sense.
sometimes i have another mystical thing going on in qmail... when i send a
mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
it tries to send it to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dbmail searches for
"@cola"
or
"@cola"
althoug it
What is the dbmail log telling?
If you set TRACE_LEVEL to 5 dbmail wil exactly explain how it is
recursively traversing the aliases table into finding the right
delivery.
It will first try to find the delivery for that address. If it doesn't
find it, it will strip everyting from before the @ a
It even won't work with mysql 3.23.52 and 3.23.56... :'(
>i now linked dbmail against mysql 3.23.57 but it has the same effect...
>sometimes i have another mystical thing going on in qmail... when i send a
>mail to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>it tries to send it to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>dbmail searches fo
i now linked dbmail against mysql 3.23.57 but it has the same effect...
sometimes i have another mystical thing going on in qmail... when i send a
mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
it tries to send it to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dbmail searches for
"@cola"
or
"@cola"
althoug it has to search for
"[EMAIL PROTECTED
The connect line in /var/log/mysql/mysql.log now does look different...
i don't know why because i don't changed anything 0_o
030805 12:32:37 6 Connect [EMAIL PROTECTED] on dbmail
dbmail-adduser s gave me
*** dbmail-adduser ***
Opening connection to database...
Opening connection to au
Something else occurred to me: Where exactly do these mysql-logs come from?
darookee wrote:
030803 0:59:32 222 Connect [EMAIL PROTECTED] as anonymous on
This doesn't look like a connection from dbmail-smtp to me. You're
connection here to no database at all. Is this a some mysql c
darookee wrote:
Hi everybody!
I tried this now for a few times... I Installed dbmail the first time
and everything worked perfectly...
Because i'm using gentoo I tried to make an ebuild. So i deleted
everything from my system ( including the database tables etc... ) and
installed it with my o
Hi everybody!
I tried this now for a few times... I Installed dbmail the first time
and everything worked perfectly...
Because i'm using gentoo I tried to make an ebuild. So i deleted
everything from my system ( including the database tables etc... ) and
installed it with my own ebuild, which wor
From: Ryan Parr
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] [dbmail-smtp] Two of every message [was dbmail-pop3d]
Sent: 11 Jul 2003 09:29:09 -0600
> On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 18:19, Jeff Brenton wrote:
> > Hello Ryan,
> >
> > RP> For some reason all e-mails are being delivered t
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 18:19, Jeff Brenton wrote:
> Hello Ryan,
>
> RP> For some reason all e-mails are being delivered to the client
> RP> twice. I have literally no idea where to go with this. I've
> RP> searched google and the dbmail archives and have come up empty
> RP> handed, though perhaps I
Richard Jones wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to find out about dbmail and (procmail) filtering.
There are a number of posts referring to a dbmail-smtp "-m" option
that's not documented in the man pages. Does this still exist?
If so where is mail delivered exactly i.e. with a procmail rule such as:
Hi,
I've been trying to find out about dbmail and (procmail) filtering.
There are a number of posts referring to a dbmail-smtp "-m" option
that's not documented in the man pages. Does this still exist?
If so where is mail delivered exactly i.e. with a procmail rule such as:
:0 c
* test
|/usr/loc
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
Not sure if this is what you mean, but I use Redhat, and the default
sendmail config is to use procmail to do the local message delivery. So in
testing out dbmail, all I did was add to my procmail config file to use
procmail to deliver mail. A procmail entry that uses
sage -
From: "Aaron Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp "recipes"
> Nope, although I recall reading that someone had set up procmail as the
> target of an alias, I can't find the posting anyplac
Nope, although I recall reading that someone had set up procmail as the
target of an alias, I can't find the posting anyplace...
Eventually DBMail hopes to have support for a sorting language such as
Sieve, for which the language is standardized by RFC and the management
interface is also by RFC,
Procmail has a wonderful little thing called "recipies" you can put in
.procmailrc.
Is there any similar functionality in dbmail-smtp?
--
Lost in Tokyo,
Keith
Hi Eelco,
/usr/sbin/sendmail
and working, yes
no probs with ver 1.1 of dbmail! (once again)
if the problem was with sendmail I think it would not matter what
trace level I set :)
I just hope this problem won't reappear in some next version like what
happened with 1.0.
Best regards,
Bobby
[EMAIL P
Hi Aaron,
Yes, this is the line, but no, normally with level 5 the segfault does
not show and everything works fine. I have commented many lines with
DEBUG level to test what makes the segfault go away under level 5 and
when I comment that line the segfault reappears even with level 5.
So, when I
Is your sendmail in the right place and working? (/usr/bin/sendmail)
Best regards,
Eelco
On donderdag, maa 6, 2003, at 19:11 Europe/Amsterdam, Boyan Alexiev
wrote:
Hi Eelco,
Thanks. I suppose you mean the signal 11 problem, so here are two
cases, both with level 5, but they have some debu
Is this the line that you're talking about?
trace (TRACE_DEBUG,"insert_messages(): alias deliver_to is [%s]",
(char *)tmp->data);
and if you comment this out, the segfault goes away?
It may indicate that tmp->data is not allocated properly...
Aaron
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Boyan
Hi Eelco,
Thanks. I suppose you mean the signal 11 problem, so here are two
cases, both with level 5, but they have some debug lines commented
out. As it may sound very strange, the problem appears also on level 5
when I put a comment on line 276 in pipe.c
Also the test shows that the problem appe
I could really use a trace level 5 on this.
Do you have one available already?
thanks a lot,
Eelco
On woensdag, maa 5, 2003, at 17:55 Europe/Amsterdam, Boyan Alexiev
wrote:
Hi Eelco,
It seems that the bug is definitely somewhere with the debug routine.
However I just installed 1.1 and it s
Hi Bobby,
I'm sure the problem is not in the debug routine :)
The problem occurs in the debug routine because the debug routine tries
to print a variable which isnt allocated or assigned.
I'll look into it some more.
Thanks,
Eelco
On woensdag, maa 5, 2003, at 17:55 Europe/Amsterdam, Boyan A
Hi Eelco,
It seems that the bug is definitely somewhere with the debug routine.
However I just installed 1.1 and it seems the problem is solved.
But there is still a problem, that I have not reported, regarding
ReadConfig(): trace lines in config.c
Although these are with TRACE_DEBUG the line appe
Hi Eelco,
Thanks for the answer. I think there is no use to send you any
message, because this applies to all messages, that are sent to a so
called "external alias" (external_forward).
Let's say I have
alias: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
deliver_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then the result is:
Mar 5 13:17:03 b
Hi Bobby,
Could you sent me the e-mail message (full source, you can do that with
the postcat command) that resulted in the sigsegv?
Best regards,
Eelco
On vrijdag, feb 21, 2003, at 22:14 Europe/Amsterdam, Boyan Alexiev
wrote:
Hello again guys!
It seems I am having some problems with 1
Where can I find the doc for dbmail-smtp?
I tried man dbmail-smtp and it only showed 2 switches that I can use.
I went on the archive emails for dbmail and found some examples about
the -m switch -u switch.
Where can i find more info about all the switches?
thanks,
Robert
Hello again guys!
It seems I am having some problems with 1.0 dbmail-smtp that are not
unknown to you. And yes, I think this is related to messages being
sent over and over again (which sadly many of you have noticed on this
very list, which I apologize for).
I am using Dbmail 1.0 official final s
Hello!
I have tried to install dbmail-1.0 but until I fixed some omissions
in the install and source files it couldn't run. Please check them and
let me know if I am correct. I am using Debian with Postfix and mysql.
settings.h:
#define DEFAULT_CONFIG_FILE "dbmail.conf"
should be
#define DEFAUL
I had the same problem and the filepath to the config file in main.c didn't
have /etc/ in front of it.
Thanks,
Andy
On 12/4/02 17:02, "Ryan Butler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 15:50, Jacques Beaudoin wrote:
>> Messages from /var/log/maillog
>>
>> Any idea where to look
>>
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 15:50, Jacques Beaudoin wrote:
> Messages from /var/log/maillog
>
> Any idea where to look
>
> Dec 4 16:41:13 mail1 dbmail/smtp[2267]: ReadConfig(): starting procedure
> Dec 4 16:41:13 mail1 dbmail/smtp[2267]: ReadConfig(): could not open
> config file [dbmail.conf]
> D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On woensdag, dec 4, 2002, at 22:50 Europe/Amsterdam, Jacques Beaudoin
wrote:
> Any idea where to look
> Dec 4 16:41:13 mail1 dbmail/smtp[2267]: ReadConfig(): starting
> procedure
> Dec 4 16:41:13 mail1 dbmail/smtp[2267]: ReadConfig(): could n
Messages from /var/log/maillog
Any idea where to look
Dec 4 16:41:13 mail1 dbmail/smtp[2267]: ReadConfig(): starting procedure
Dec 4 16:41:13 mail1 dbmail/smtp[2267]: ReadConfig(): could not open
config file [dbmail.conf]
Dec 4 16:41:13 mail1 postfix/pipe[2253]: ADC6167CC7:
to=<[EMAIL PRO
Hi guys
I wonder if u guys can help me out , I have been using dbmail for the
last six months and there are a few problems that I just cannot figure
out the first problem I encountered is when I run fetchmail to get the
mail from my mail server running postfix on a Suse 7.3 platform for some
messa
Hi guys
I wonder if u guys can help me out , I have been using dbmail for the
last six months and there are a few problems that I just cannot figure
out the first problem I encountered is when I run fetchmail to get the
mail from my mail server running postfix on a Suse 7.3 platform for some
messa
At 00:00 11/08/2002 +1000, Philip Warner wrote:
At 11:10 10/08/2002 +0200, Eelco van Beek - IC&S wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] !/bin/spamassasin|/usr/local/sbin/dbmail-smtp -u
eelco
I'm using the above to insert a filter before delivery, but lines starting
with 'From' (notably the first line
At 11:10 10/08/2002 +0200, Eelco van Beek - IC&S wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] !/bin/spamassasin|/usr/local/sbin/dbmail-smtp -u eelco
I'm using the above to insert a filter before delivery, but lines starting
with 'From' (notably the first line of the message) are being escaped
(prepending a
I'm trying to get aroung loosing email due to not having all my email
addresses aliased. And was looking through the dbmail-smtp options. (I use
dbmail as the mda from fetchmail)
Now the last line in my .fetchmailrc from reads:
mda "/usr/local/sbin/dbmail-smtp -n to"
My question is can I force al
hi everyone,
just skimming through the mails on the list and i noticed that several
of you think of dbmail-smtp-injector as the replacement of dbmail-smtp.
While it's true that it will eventually replace dbmail-smtp (offering
the same functionality with speed improvements) it still is under
cons
98 matches
Mail list logo
