On 25/9/02 4:21 AM, "Roel Rozendaal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The basic layout for dbmail was based upon pop3 but we are interested in
> better schemes for imap. One of the main goals right now is to have the
> fastest imap server around. Better table layouts would mean a great
> improvement;
Parsing is definitely the issue. I wrote a very simple Python application
to parse headers in my dbmail inbox - a run against 50 messages takes about
4 seconds on a very fast box, using standard Python libraries.
The question is, what's more important - message insertion or subsequent
processi
Honestly I don't think using "select " or "select *" is a big
speed difference - it's more like the ultimate fine tuning. I think
dramatic results can be achieved by developing a table layout/imap logic
that minimizes the number of queries and the amount of parsing done by
the imap server.
On Tue
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 10:48, Sam Przyswa wrote:
> >Unless your program is getting back the rows as name value pairs and picking
> through what gets sent back, you want to be specifying the columns and the
> order
> that they are to be sent back, not asking for everything and assuming that the
> o
Roel Rozendaal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivait:
>
>The basic layout for dbmail was based upon pop3 but we are interested in
>better schemes for imap. One of the main goals right now is to have the
>fastest imap server around. Better table layouts would mean a great
>improvement; just don't know how mu
The basic layout for dbmail was based upon pop3 but we are interested in
better schemes for imap. One of the main goals right now is to have the
fastest imap server around. Better table layouts would mean a great
improvement; just don't know how much time will be involved in
implementing those.
Thi
Roel Rozendaal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivait:
>
>Why use messageblks? Well, for one reason, mysql has a limit on the record
>size so a split-up is necessary anyway. The system was chosen to handle big
>messages in chunks.
>
Ok, I guessed that there is a good reason to do that, but it's possible to
eric ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivait:
>
>On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:48:33 -0700 in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Micah Stevens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just a note, on your query comments, although I'm not arguing with your
>> basic point, it's always been my understanding that SELECT statements that
3:52 PM
Subject: RE: [Dbmail] Imapd is slow as hell
> Micah Stevens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> >Just a note, on your query comments, although I'm not arguing with your
> >basic point, it's always been my understanding that SELECT statements
that
> >use
Micah Stevens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>Just a note, on your query comments, although I'm not arguing with your
>basic point, it's always been my understanding that SELECT statements that
>use '*' instead of stating field names are slower. If you don't specify the
>field names the database has
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:48:33 -0700 in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Micah
Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a note, on your query comments, although I'm not arguing with your
> basic point, it's always been my understanding that SELECT statements that
> use '*' instead of stating field na
s speed and discuss
to find the best way to do.
Shih Ming-Wei a dit :
> My imap is working fine but pop3 is very slow, I have ask a few times
> on the list but apparently nobody is interested :(
>
> Ming-Wei
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: John Wall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
:
> My imap is working fine but pop3 is very slow, I have ask a few times
> on the list but apparently nobody is interested :(
>
> Ming-Wei
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Wall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:24 AM
> To: dbmail@dbm
On 2002-09-05 18:13:31 +0200, Shih Ming-Wei wrote:
> Well, as I said, I tried it on 2 different newly installed platforms
> (one intel and one sparc) in two different networks with 2 different
> ip addresses. So the problem is really the pop3d on my system, 'cause
> imapd is fast as hell and pop3d
6:03 PM
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Imapd is slow as hell
I am using both IMAP and POP3. I have about 1000 users and my dbmail system
is very fast. I have no problems downloading 100 emails at a time in mere
seconds. This is with amavisd-new/sophie/spamassasin/razor.
I thin
IL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 4:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: dbmail@dbmail.org
> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] Imapd is slow as hell
>
> > I set up dbmail with mysql (innodb) on a small machine (pII 366, 128 MB
>
> Which version of dbmail are you using? Is
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: dbmail@dbmail.org
Subject: RE: [Dbmail] Imapd is slow as hell
> I set up dbmail with mysql (innodb) on a small machine (pII 366, 128 MB
Which version of dbmail are you using? Is it RC3, or a more recent CVS
version?
Chris Hilts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:10 AM
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Imapd is slow as hell
Hi I have a problem using dbmail and fetchmail i'm not quit sure what
the problem is maybe u can help me
running suse7.3 with dbmail and all it requirements as well as
fetc
D]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:24 AM
Subject: [Dbmail] Imapd is slow as hell
> Imapd is slow as hell.
>
> pop3d is fast when i press "send and recive" but on my imapd account it
> takes up to a minute before it tryes to login. I heave allready check DNS
> and my
try fetchmail -vvv to see more debug info, and share it with us
Ming-Wei
-Original Message-
From: Abdulla Damingo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:10 AM
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Imapd is slow as hell
Hi I have a problem using dbmail and
ssage-
> From: Shih Ming-Wei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:57 PM
> To: 'dbmail@dbmail.org'
> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] Imapd is slow as hell
>
> Well just 1 test user with 1 test msg, I don't think tuning the
> db would help much. With the
> I set up dbmail with mysql (innodb) on a small machine (pII 366, 128 MB
Which version of dbmail are you using? Is it RC3, or a more recent CVS
version?
Chris Hilts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AM
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Imapd is slow as hell
What is wrong with the speed of pop3? We're running dbmail for 22.000
users all using pop3. No problems at all...
Best regards,
Eelco
Shih Ming-Wei heeft op dinsdag, 27 aug 2002 om 10:51 (Europe/Amsterdam)
het volgende geschreve
dbmail.org'
Subject: RE: [Dbmail] Imapd is slow as hell
Well just 1 test user with 1 test msg, I don't think tuning the
db would help much. With the same condition the imap is fast as
hell :)
Ming-Wei
-Original Message-
From: Bret Baptist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August
: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:57 PM
To: 'dbmail@dbmail.org'
Subject: RE: [Dbmail] Imapd is slow as hell
Well just 1 test user with 1 test msg, I don't think tuning the
db would help much. With the same condition the imap is fast as
hell :)
Ming-Wei
-Original Message-
Fro
ng-Wei
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Wall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:24 AM
> To: dbmail@dbmail.org
> Subject: [Dbmail] Imapd is slow as hell
>
>
> Imapd is slow as hell.
>
> pop3d is fast when i press "send and recive"
t: Re: [Dbmail] Imapd is slow as hell
On Monday 26 August 2002 04:43 am, Shih Ming-Wei wrote:
> My imap is working fine but pop3 is very slow, I have ask a few
> times on the list but apparently nobody is interested :(
Have you checked out the suggested database indexing mentioned on the
mailing
l
On Monday 26 August 2002 04:43 am, Shih Ming-Wei wrote:
> My imap is working fine but pop3 is very slow, I have ask a few
> times on the list but apparently nobody is interested :(
Have you checked out the suggested database indexing mentioned on the mailing
list?
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/piper
On Monday 26 August 2002 02:24 am, John Wall wrote:
> Imapd is slow as hell.
Have you checked out the database tuneups suggested on the mailing list?
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/pipermail/dbmail/2002-April/000435.html
Check that out.
>
>
> /John
>
--
Bret Baptist
Systems and Technical Support Sp
My imap is working fine but pop3 is very slow, I have ask a few
times on the list but apparently nobody is interested :(
Ming-Wei
-Original Message-
From: John Wall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:24 AM
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Subject: [Dbmail] Imapd is slow as
Imapd is slow as hell.
pop3d is fast when i press "send and recive" but on my imapd account it
takes up to a minute before it tryes to login. I heave allready check DNS
and my host file.
Imapd works fast sometimes and sometimes it slow as hell. I got only 3 users
on that mailserver with dbmail.
31 matches
Mail list logo
