* Patrick Shanahan [09-26-17 14:33]:
[...]
> I see a "new to me" msg displayed, "### local copies have been
> synchronized"
>
> is it new or am I just noticing?
never mind and pardon the noise. I now realize why this appears.
--
(paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA
* Patrick Shanahan [09-26-17 07:32]:
> * Tobias Ellinghaus [09-26-17 05:55]:
> > Am Montag, 25. September 2017, 18:02:54 CEST schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > anyway startup only amounts to ~15 seconds on my workstation and isn't a
> > > bother, just noticable. and startup is
* Tobias Ellinghaus [09-26-17 05:55]:
> Am Montag, 25. September 2017, 18:02:54 CEST schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
>
> [...]
>
> > anyway startup only amounts to ~15 seconds on my workstation and isn't a
> > bother, just noticable. and startup is only slow when I don't have a set
> > active, ie: it
Am Montag, 25. September 2017, 18:02:54 CEST schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
[...]
> anyway startup only amounts to ~15 seconds on my workstation and isn't a
> bother, just noticable. and startup is only slow when I don't have a set
> active, ie: it is accessing the entire collection of 88k instead of
I have also experienced very little trouble with Darktable reliability- or
scalability-wise. One of my databases has ~170k images and has been going
without interruption since I first created it with Darktable 1.4.2. The
only slowdowns I have noticed are those related to the tagging module,
previou
* Tobias Ellinghaus [09-25-17 17:44]:
> Am Montag, 25. September 2017, 15:32:55 CEST schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
> > * johannes hanika [09-25-17 14:21]:
> > > .. and that is images, not bytes in the db, right? most impressive :)
> >
> > yes, images 16mb,24mb and a very few 12mb
> >
> > > any part
Am Montag, 25. September 2017, 15:32:55 CEST schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
> * johannes hanika [09-25-17 14:21]:
> > .. and that is images, not bytes in the db, right? most impressive :)
>
> yes, images 16mb,24mb and a very few 12mb
>
> > any particular operations that show significant slowdown due
* johannes hanika [09-25-17 14:21]:
> .. and that is images, not bytes in the db, right? most impressive :)
yes, images 16mb,24mb and a very few 12mb
> any particular operations that show significant slowdown due to this?
> or does it just work?
I notice no slow-down anywhere except it takes a
.. and that is images, not bytes in the db, right? most impressive :)
any particular operations that show significant slowdown due to this?
or does it just work?
cheers,
jo
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 4:45 AM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> this morning my library contained >88.5k
>
>
> --
> (paka)Patr
