Re: [darktable-dev] Harsh reaction

2016-10-04 Thread Steven Adler
There is a certain arrogance about that response from Roman that is most unpleasant. On Oct 3, 2016 5:33 PM, "Jan Ingwer Baer" wrote: > Hi Roman, > > i have tried to avoid at least some of your arguments against windows > developers. And you give me no chance. > > Jan > > Am 03.10.2016 um 23:19

Re: [darktable-dev] Harsh reaction

2016-10-04 Thread moritz
On 3/10/2016 11:33 PM, Jan Ingwer Baer wrote: i have tried to avoid at least some of your arguments against windows developers. And you give me no chance. Well, I would just ignore this. I think replying to someone's message -- while admitting to not having read the message (but only the subj

Re: [darktable-dev] Harsh reaction

2016-10-04 Thread Mark Feit
On 10/04/2016 02:54 AM, Frederic Crozat wrote: Just ignore him. This kind of behavior is not acceptable (I'm not a darktable developer, I have zero interest in Windows or macos ports, I'm only helping for openSUSE packaging when needed). You are fixing real bugs in the codebase, which happen

Re: [darktable-dev] Harsh reaction

2016-10-03 Thread Frederic Crozat
Just ignore him. This kind of behavior is not acceptable (I'm not a darktable developer, I have zero interest in Windows or macos ports, I'm only helping for openSUSE packaging when needed). You are fixing real bugs in the codebase, which happen by chance to not be visible on Linux. They should st

[darktable-dev] Harsh reaction

2016-10-03 Thread Jan Ingwer Baer
Hi Roman, i have tried to avoid at least some of your arguments against windows developers. And you give me no chance. Jan Am 03.10.2016 um 23:19 schrieb Roman Lebedev: How do i politely put it? Because we are sick and tired of this topic. This is my last mail on the subject. On Mon, Oct 3