There is a certain arrogance about that response from Roman that is most
unpleasant.

On Oct 3, 2016 5:33 PM, "Jan Ingwer Baer" <jib...@web.de> wrote:

> Hi Roman,
>
> i have tried to avoid at least some of your arguments against windows
> developers. And you give me no chance.
>
> Jan
>
> Am 03.10.2016 um 23:19 schrieb Roman Lebedev:
>
>> How do i politely put it?
>> Because we are sick and tired of this topic.
>>
>> This is my last mail on the subject.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Jan Ingwer Baer <jib...@web.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Roman,
>>>
>>> why do you react so harsh? I think this is not the right way. My work on
>>> the
>>> windows version is a try to get enough people  to do the windows work. I
>>> know that i am not the only one who wants to work on this.
>>>
>>
>> No wonder that other people run away from this project after a short time
>>> if
>>> they get such a hostile reaction. Better read my mail complete and think
>>> again. If you had read my mail, you would know that your reference to
>>> your
>>> mail from december 2015 is at least partly wrong.
>>>
>> Like i said, i did not read your mail at all. So no need to re-read.
>>
>> I dont try to do some packaging of an darktable windows version. I have
>>> put
>>> all my work to a public github-repo (see my mail). So the core-team can
>>> view
>>> my changes and can merge them to the main repo. I have some things that
>>> i've
>>> found in the source written in my mail. So i try my best to contribute.
>>>
>>> How can i met your requirements for contributing to darktable if i not
>>> use
>>> linux or mac-os? The only way for me to be actively involved in
>>> darktable is
>>> to do it on windows. That is what i try.
>>>
>>> Greetings
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 03.10.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Roman Lebedev:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> (spoiler: i have read only the mail subject.)
>>>>
>>>> Is this Battlestar Galactica or something? :)
>>>> "All this has happened before, and all of it will happen again."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/darktable-dev%40lists.darktable
>>>> .org/msg00344.html
>>>>
>>>> Please do actually read what is written there, and do understand it.
>>>> There is absolutely nothing to add to that mail.
>>>> And nothing has changed since it was written, all and every point still
>>>> applies.
>>>>
>>>> Roman.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Jan Ingwer Baer <jib...@web.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> i have done some work to build darktable for windows. Now i can build
>>>>> it
>>>>> (without maps and lua) on windows and first test show no problems. I
>>>>> have
>>>>> done this in first for my private use. But i share this, so other can
>>>>> test
>>>>> and use it. At this time it is only for developres, and not ready for
>>>>> end-users.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope that i can find enough other interested developers who can help
>>>>> to
>>>>> test and stabilize it.
>>>>>
>>>>> You find my changes i the branch 'darktable-2.0.x-win' in my github
>>>>> fork
>>>>> 'https://github.com/jibaer/darktable.git'.
>>>>>
>>>>> While building the windows version i have found some issues in the
>>>>> darktable-source:
>>>>>
>>>>> - In common/film.c function film_recursive_get_files() there is a
>>>>> mistake
>>>>> in
>>>>> the call to function g_build_filename(). It is called with the same
>>>>> parameters as g_build_pathname(), but according to the glib manual it
>>>>> does
>>>>> not need the first parameter (G_DIR_SEPARATOR_S). Under windows this
>>>>> will
>>>>> produce an invalid filename with a leading slash (like /c:/user/...).
>>>>> Under
>>>>> *ix this no problem because it will simple double the leading slash of
>>>>> an
>>>>> absolute path what the os ignores.
>>>>>
>>>>> - In common/darktable.c function strip_semicolons_from_keymap() there
>>>>> is
>>>>> only a test for the result of fgetc() !=eof. But on mingw this doesnt
>>>>> work,
>>>>> and it must test for feof() ==0. Without the test for feof() the result
>>>>> is
>>>>> an infinite loop...
>>>>>
>>>>> - With gcc 6.x the search-path for include-files is very important and
>>>>> the
>>>>> includes <cmath> and <cstdlib> will not work if the default search
>>>>> order
>>>>> for
>>>>> the system-include-directorys is changed. Because the cmake-files
>>>>> insert
>>>>> some include-paths with the system-attributes they change the
>>>>> default-search-order and the build will fail with the error : file
>>>>> <stdlib.h> not found. On my mingw-build i have found a solution in an
>>>>> edit
>>>>> to src/CMakeLists.txt that avoids to do use the system-attribute while
>>>>> adding the include-path for PThreads.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope you will accept my contribution and dont take it hostile. And
>>>>> with
>>>>> the help from more developers some day there will be an official
>>>>> version
>>>>> of
>>>>> darktable for windows. To use another raw-photo application is not an
>>>>> alternative because DT has at least two outstanding features:
>>>>> - The profile-based noise-reduction is really great
>>>>> - The mask feature is also really great
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings from Berlin
>>>>>
>>>>> Jan Ingwer Baer
>>>>>
>>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>>> _______________
>>>>> darktable developer mailing list
>>>>> to unsubscribe send a mail to
>>>>> darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> ____________________________________________________________
> _______________
> darktable developer mailing list
> to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscribe@list
> s.darktable.org
>
>

___________________________________________________________________________
darktable developer mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

Reply via email to