Hi,
I really believe that a photo software should have a neutral grey
background in a order to avoid wrong feelings of contrast and exposition
during the processing. The dark interface of DT led me many times to
underexpose my pictures whereas a neutral grey gives a central reference
for cont
Le lundi 24 octobre 2016 à 23:04 +0300, Alex a écrit :
> I see this as chroma noise. Same issue as in the images I've linked,
> just a lot less obvious.
>
> I'm talking about https://www.sendspace.com/file/uem3t6 here.
Hey please!
I have already acknowledged and said that in the original mes
I see this as chroma noise. Same issue as in the images I've linked, just a
lot less obvious.
I'm talking about https://www.sendspace.com/file/uem3t6 here.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Pascal Obry wrote:
> Le lundi 24 octobre 2016 à 22:46 +0300, Alex a écrit :
> > He complains about magent
Le lundi 24 octobre 2016 à 22:46 +0300, Alex a écrit :
> He complains about magenta shadows.
Yes, but then:
<<<
The one you generated shows the surface of car body as covered with a
little scratches (zoom to 1:1 and compare).
>>>
Those are luma noise. And I was responding to this (after respond
He complains about magenta shadows.
> Black should remain black - if not 100% black, then as
> shade of grey, but surely without magenta "sand" on it.
The issue is obvious in these images:
http://i.imgur.com/0sixStb.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/12eQb4y.jpg
Of course, they were not rendered with darkta
Le lundi 24 octobre 2016 à 20:29 +0300, Alex a écrit :
> > That's luminance noise and certainly not a problem to me.
>
> To me, it looks like chroma noise, but the defect is not really
> obvious in this example.
No please reread the exchange. At first there was chroma noise (I've
explained how to
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 08:29:38PM +0300, Alex wrote:
> Zbigniew,
>
> Can you prepare a CR2 similar to this one? http://i.imgur.com/0sixStb.jpg
Do you mean: to shoot something dark, on high ISO value - to get grainy
result - and in similar lighting conditions?
--
regards,
Zbigniew
_
Zbigniew,
Can you prepare a CR2 similar to this one? http://i.imgur.com/0sixStb.jpg
It can be the original CR2 from the same example, if you can find it
or get it from OP. Or a similar scene that shows the same defect.
I've got a theory about a possible fix, so I'd like to look into it.
Basical
Not sure where else to put this, but I sent a request to the user's mailing
list address, and I still don't see any messages in my inbox.
I have a question about the lighttable and darkroom button size I wanted to
post -- they are too big now, after I upgraded to Kubuntu
16.10.
--
"That is n
git describe
release-0.9.3-13734-ge493501
git status
On branch master
Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 3 commits.
(use "git push" to publish your local commits)
Untracked files:
(use "git add ..." to include in what will be committed)
po/he.mo
nothing added to commit but untracked
Zbigniew,
> Anyway, I'm aware it's rather a matter of personal taste, but I'm
> convinced
> that after you examine both pictures again - and even more closely -
> you'll
> agree that this Silkypix-made is a little bit better. The one you
> generated
> shows the surface of car body as covered with
JLC> What I see:
JLC> 1 - The exposure level is not the same on both the pictures - there is
JLC> about 1 EV difference
JLC> 2 - The silkypix.jpg is noise processed while the darktable.jpg is not.
Most probably silkypix is denoising - I'm not opposed to that - what I was
trying to explain is that
Am Montag, 24. Oktober 2016, 15:58:32 CEST schrieb shlomi braitbart:
> When I do
> $ git pull
> I am getting:
> $ Already up-to-date.
That sounds odd as I pushed changes before I wrote my last mail.
What is the output of
cd /home/shlomi/darktable2/darktable/
git describe
git status
> (I am on t
What I see:
1 - The exposure level is not the same on both the pictures - there is
about 1 EV difference
2 - The silkypix.jpg is noise processed while the darktable.jpg is not.
Regards
Jean-Luc
2016-10-24 16:14 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew :
> J-L.C.> Is there something wrong as I don't SEE anything wr
Hi Shlomi, I have noticed the same build problem as you from git master. if I
delete the build directory it
fails, but if I rerun it build ok.
I am using Debian Jessie (stable).
The only error I get is "Missing jsonschema, problems in noiseprofiles.json
might go unnoticed" But it says 3
lines l
J-L.C.> Is there something wrong as I don't SEE anything wrong
P.O.> Same here. I don't see anything wrong.
Encouraged by your answers just installed current version of Darktable - and
what I can say, is... guys, I honestly can't believe you didn't see this:
https://www.sendspace.com/file/uem3t
J-L.C.> Is there something wrong as I don't SEE anything wrong
P.O.> Same here. I don't see anything wrong.
Encouraged by your answers just installed current version of Darktable - and
what I can say, is... guys, I honestly can't believe you didn't see this:
https://www.sendspace.com/file/uem3t
OK, thanks - so it may be partial answer to my original question; since you
don't see it using Darktable in "development" process, then probably its
decoding procedures - at least the ones used to decode Canon's RAW files -
are better than the ones in LR 5.7.1.
You may want to examine my examples
Am Montag, 24. Oktober 2016, 01:49:32 CEST schrieb shlomi braitbart:
> Okay, I managed to build DT.
> It is strange but if I delete the build folder and run the build.sh script
> I get an error as in the attached "cmake_output22.txt" file.
> Running the build.sh again without deleting the build di
I notice that the 'G' grouping symbol is often difficult to see
particularly when the image has been cropped and much of the frame is used.
Would it be practical to have this symbol in red or other dominant color?
David
__
2016-10-24 10:44 GMT+02:00 Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) :
> I've downloaded your picture.
> I've used the colour picker on the black car at the upper left.
> I used the "zone" picker and drawn a square on the black car.
>
> Without pushing the exposure but with the base curve applied, I get:
> 80, 80, 7
I've downloaded your picture.
I've used the colour picker on the black car at the upper left.
I used the "zone" picker and drawn a square on the black car.
Without pushing the exposure but with the base curve applied, I get:
80, 80, 78
With +1EV, I get:
118, 118, 115
Is there something wrong as I
22 matches
Mail list logo
