Am Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2016, 19:14:24 CEST schrieb Alexander Rabtchevich:
> Hello
>
> Today's git updates made darktable not to start.
>
> [init] moving database into new XDG directory structure
> [init] can't copy updated values back to `tagged_images'
> [init] UNIQUE constraint failed: tagge
Hello
Today's git updates made darktable not to start.
[init] moving database into new XDG directory structure
[init] can't copy updated values back to `tagged_images'
[init] UNIQUE constraint failed: tagged_images.imgid, tagged_images.tagid
[init] database `library.db' couldn't be upgraded fr
There is a certain arrogance about that response from Roman that is most
unpleasant.
On Oct 3, 2016 5:33 PM, "Jan Ingwer Baer" wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> i have tried to avoid at least some of your arguments against windows
> developers. And you give me no chance.
>
> Jan
>
> Am 03.10.2016 um 23:19
On 10/04/2016 09:46 AM, Roman Lebedev wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Maurizio Paglia wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> my Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC LD Aspherical (IF) is not
>> recognized inside darktable
>
>> but I have to select manually Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II VC LD
>> A
Hi all,
my Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC LD Aspherical (IF) is not
recognized inside darktable but I have to select manually Tamron SP AF
17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II VC LD Aspherical (IF).
The only difference is F/2.8 (uppercase while in dt list is lowercase).
I got in touch with Lensfun people
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Maurizio Paglia wrote:
> Hi all,
> my Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC LD Aspherical (IF) is not
> recognized inside darktable
> but I have to select manually Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II VC LD
> Aspherical (IF).
On http://lensfun.sourceforge.net/len
let's wait for another couple of days for this then? and soft-freeze
the other features ;) ?
cheers,
jo
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2016, 13:01:43 CEST schrieb Roman Lebedev:
>
> [...]
>
>> I'm not sure about merging it *right now*, IIRC T
Am Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2016, 13:01:43 CEST schrieb Roman Lebedev:
[...]
> I'm not sure about merging it *right now*, IIRC Tobias had some ideas
> about undo in general.
My only concern was with the way our undo infrastructure works. And even that
was more details of the design, like having glo
On 3/10/2016 11:33 PM, Jan Ingwer Baer wrote:
i have tried to avoid at least some of your arguments against windows
developers. And you give me no chance.
Well, I would just ignore this.
I think replying to someone's message -- while admitting to not having
read the message (but only the subj
On 10/04/2016 02:54 AM, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Just ignore him. This kind of behavior is not acceptable (I'm not a
darktable developer, I have zero interest in Windows or macos ports,
I'm only helping for openSUSE packaging when needed).
You are fixing real bugs in the codebase, which happen
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Pascal Obry wrote:
> Hi Jo,
>
> I really would have like to have the darkroom undo feature merged.
Hey.
First of all, i must say, i *really* like this undo :)
> https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/pull/1103
I'm not sure about merging it *right now*, IIRC
Hi Jo,
I really would have like to have the darkroom undo feature merged.
https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/pull/1103
I'm not sure where we stand, I can try to rebase on master and finalize this.
Cheers,
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by means
hi all,
in an effort to get a feature release out before end of the year this
time around, i'd like to announce the feature freeze for 2.2 on the
master branch.
this should give us devs some time to make the features we have more
stable, and everybody else a chance to find bugs.
note that we're
Am Montag, 3. Oktober 2016, 10:42:02 CEST schrieb Pascal Obry:
> 2016-10-02 16:12 GMT+02:00 Tobias Ellinghaus :
> > darktable master just introduced a long awaited change: splitting the
> > library into two databases, one library.db with image related things and
> > data.db which contains all the g
Am Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2016, 07:07:52 CEST schrieb thokster:
> Hi,
Hi.
> ...
> [init] can't copy updated values back to `tagged_images'
> [init] UNIQUE constraint failed: tagged_images.imgid, tagged_images.tagid
> [init] database `library.db' couldn't be upgraded from version 12 to 13.
> abort
15 matches
Mail list logo