Dave Del Torto writes:
> ostensibly been offering for years, i.e. "CRYPT-PW" (which was always
> people), and "PGP" (which never really worked anyway as you know if
crypt-pw never worked either. At least, I could never get it to work.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.c
R.A. Hettinga writes:
> Similar scams have occurred around the country:
>
> _ In New Jersey, nine state motor vehicle employees pleaded guilty to a
> scheme that involved payoffs for bogus licenses.
>
> _ In Illinois, a federal investigation into the trading of bribes for
> driver's licens
R.A. Hettinga writes:
> Any e-mail authentication system, for example, would check that the block
> of Internet addresses assigned to an e-mail provider includes the specific
> numeric address of a sender of a piece of e-mail.
Huh? Somebody is confused here. DomainKeys is 1) an e-mail
authent
R.A. Hettinga writes:
> >mail, followed by email from strangers (which is where all the spam
> >is).
>
> A whitelist for my friends, all others pay...
>
> oh, forget it.
Anybody can pay to send email right now. You just go to paypal, type
in the person's email, enter the amount of money y
AARG!Anonymous writes:
> I'd like the Palladium/TCPA critics to offer an alternative proposal
> for achieving the following technical goal:
>
> Allow computers separated on the internet to cooperate and share data
> and computations such that no one can get access to the data outside
>
Adam Back writes:
> So there are practical limits stemming from realities to do with code
> complexity being inversely proportional to auditability and security,
> but the extra ring -1, remote attestation, sealing and integrity
> metrics really do offer some security advantages over the curre
