he offices were under construction
>> and not everyone had moved in yet.
>
>I wonder if they knew that, though...
Impossible to know at this point, maybe impossible to know forever.
Reese
.com to book the appropriately
flights. I think that it was executed very well. My hats off to who ever
did this, but in my other hand is my 1911.
There is one brain behind all this. Find it and barbecue it on skewers,
along with whoever and whatever fosters its existence.
Reese
for them, or become Prime Minister of some remote
>colony, or die nobly surrounded by hordes of locals asking impolitely
>for their land back.
Your very English sentiments noted. Get back in queue.
Reese
At 11:49 PM 9/16/2001 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Reese wrote:
>
>> But the world would be a better place
>> if everyone would say "fuck you" instead of doing the shit they do.
>>
>> Reese
>
>Fuck You Reese!
That's the spirit!
Fuck you too!
Reese
At 10:03 PM 9/16/2001 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>On Sunday, September 16, 2001, at 09:44 PM, Reese wrote:
>
>> At 03:18 AM 9/17/2001 +, Anonymous User wrote:
>> >On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Tim May wrote:
>> >
>> >[...]
>> >
>>
citizenq[ueer]@hushmail.com babbled:
>C-130s or equivalent passing
Loose lips sink ships, and et cetera.
Shut the fuck up.
I said, shut the fuck up.
At 06:29 PM 9/16/2001 -0700, citizenq[uisling]@hushmail.com wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
>Yes, this is intelligent. 1) where? 2) when? O yes, big threat.
>Like the Afghani's can't see the dust of fucking tanks already.
>
>Did anyone say civil lib
Fuck you Tim.
At 06:50 PM 9/16/2001 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>On Sunday, September 16, 2001, at 06:37 PM, Reese wrote:
>
>
>> I said, shut the fuck up.
>>
>
>
>
>
>C-130 transports are departing Fort Ord, 7th Light Infantry.
>
>
>AWACS
At 07:51 PM 9/16/2001 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>
>It's a free country. Nothing you can do about it.
It's broadcasting troop movements if that information is real,
it is very foolish if you made it all up.
You aren't a fool, so what's your problem?
MW - that's an Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile Winnebago.
No one would dare try anything, they'd know that every weekend, we would
have a million Americans out on the road with a sixpack and an itchy
button finger, just waiting for something to go wrong"
Reese
At 10:04 AM 9/25/01 -0700, Black Unicorn wrote:
>The hearing for markup of the Anti Terrorism Act of 2001 has been
>cancelled by direction of the Chairman and has not been rescheduled
>at this time.
That's the best news I've heard since 9-11. Your source for this,
if you don't mind?
Reese
as Cognitive Dissonance. Draw your own conclusions.
Reese
Dear anonymous:
Fuck off.
ps - I don't huff, and there's still no evidence to suggest there ever will
be a Buchanon Administration. He still has less chance than a candle in a
tornado.
At 12:40 PM 24/03/00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Subject: stop huffing, reese
>
>
At 11:46 AM 06/04/00 +0200, Tom Vogt wrote:
>Reese wrote:
>> >get real. while there are no guns involved, and thus the word "force"
>> >might be debatable, the amount of choice available to a) end-users and
>> >b) resellers is far from what
At 05:48 PM 06/04/00 -0400, Marcel Popescu wrote:
>[Reese, don't make the
>mistake of believing that only the government is socialist; most people
>are - even those claiming to be capitalists will tell you that the state
>must do this and that.]
I see this as well, and ge
At 10:24 AM 07/04/00 +0200, Tom Vogt wrote:
>Reese wrote:
>> >that's the point: last year.
>>
>> No, the point is that whatever monopoly M$ might have tried to bring to
>> fruition, if they even did, is crumbling by simple virtue of the market
>> economy
At 04:51 AM 07/04/00 -0400, Tom Vogt wrote:
>Tim May wrote:
>> >if you are a company, then going bancrupt is the equivalence of dying.
>> >someone threatening you - overt or implied - with driving you out of
>> >business is the equivalent of a murder threat, right?
>>
>> You're being foolish.
>
>
At 11:22 AM 08/04/00 -0400, Marcel Popescu wrote:
>From: Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> It's pie-in-the-sky, but were I in the oval office, I'd declare martial
>> law, kill all the bureaucratic agencies that aren't authorized by the
>> constitution,
x27;ve entered the forum, say
something good about his politics.
Reese
Looks like a little more tweaking is on order. Which one of those upper
case words is a majordomo command? Get? Shouldn't be enabled on a c'punks
node.
Work on it when you get a chance, would'ja?
At 10:04 PM 21/04/00 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>We are sorry, but this system sensed the
At 05:04 AM 22/04/00 -0400, Petro wrote:
>
>>Michelle, you idiot, what makes you think his father has any rights? His
>>father is a Cuban subject who has not requested asylum. Elian _has_
>>requested asylum. Once joined with his father, do you think the Just Us
>>Dept. will lift a finger to pre
r parents, as a
Hero of the Revolution. How Precious.
>The kidnappers of Elian G. should now face kidnapping charges for the
>several weeks they held him after being told he was not theirs to
>hold.
According to the 11th circuit, ruling issued last Wednesday, he was fine
where he was, there was no direction to remand him to the custody of the
father.
You sure are turning into a communist sympathizer lately Tim.
Reese
At 03:34 AM 26/04/00 -0400, Tom Vogt wrote:
>Marcel Popescu wrote:
>> Irrelevant. We're not interested in bacteria, but in humans. And we're not
>> interested in 7 billion years from now on, but in (at most) the next
hundred
>> years. Given the current technology, we could feed probably 1,000 bill
aska, perhaps even antarctica into
account.
More arable land in the temperate zones, slightly harsher in the equatorial
regions, if "global warming" comes to fruition.
Or, we could kick NASA in the cajones and become a true space-faring race.
Reese
At 04:00 PM 28/04/00 +0200, Tom Vogt wrote:
>Reese wrote:
>> If he doesn't want the title, author and ISBN for this (from memory) quote
>> below,
>> I certainly do, so I can see what sort of drivel you've been mushing up
>> your skull with.
>
>h
x27;Render unto Ceaser that which is Ceasers'.
>
>Yeah. Many people ignore exactly WHAT was Caesar's in Israel at the time.
>That is, nothing at all. Jesus didn't say "pay taxes", or "don't pay taxes";
>as usually, he wanted people to think.
At 11:20 AM 24/07/00 -0400, David Honig wrote:
>At 12:42 AM 7/24/00 -0400, Reese wrote:
>> >>Japan may not have the US constitution, but their current constitution
>> >>was written by the US government in 1946. The American concepts of
>> >>civil r
At 10:13 AM 24/07/00 -0700, David Honig wrote:
>At 06:03 AM 7/24/00 -1000, Reese wrote:
>>At 11:20 AM 24/07/00 -0400, David Honig wrote:
>> >At 12:42 AM 7/24/00 -0400, Reese wrote:
>> >> >>Japan may not have the US constitution, but their current constit
cops should have caught
that. Actually, the canadian border cops did catch much of it, but let it
on through, forcing us to deal with it. I guess it isn't illegal to export
improvised explosives from canuck land.
Note - you munged the quotes - I fixed them. Idiot.
Reese
ir basil. (I know you can order "Bobcat" for this purpose. I
>don't know if it comes in other flavours.)
Horse manure accomplishes the same thing, if used instead of cattle manure
as a fertilizer.
Then, you aren't pandering to a dubious cottage industry.
Reese
>Y
At 09:48 AM 15/08/00 -0400, David Honig wrote:
>At 12:56 AM 8/15/00 -0400, Reese wrote:
>>Horse manure accomplishes the same thing, if used instead of cattle manure
>>as a fertilizer.
>
>Well just as the hoohah got started, someone from PETA dropped
>a ton of horse m
's not all he's confusing.
>>Before quantum computing goes commercial, many hurdles must be
>>cleared,
here's the windup, the pitch,,,
>>not the least of which will be deciding if the miniscule
>>machines will support open-source Linux or Windows from Microsoft
>>Corp. (stock: MSFT), Redmond, Wash.
strike three.
>And now I assume the whole article is a joke...or "Information Week"
>is a joke for employing him.
you got it toyota.
Reese
he ever was.
Yours is to provide conclusive, irrefutable proof, not make wild
accusations.
If you've done this as many times as you've said, one would think
you had all the requested arguments, proofs and critiques readily
at hand.
Time is running out, for your credibility on this issue.
Reese
on on all of this, I'll not repeat myself now.
You have provided new info, I'll be looking into it - even though a part
of it is checking to see whether you've quoted your own webpage accurately.
Reese
; > existence of this evidence?
>
>06:51 PM 10/7/2000 -1000, Reese wrote:
> > Learn how to read - and comprehend - what I type. Stop trying to
> > put words in my mouth.
>
> So which is it?
>
>Why is it that Chomsky's fans
Fucking idiot.
For the last ti
remove
tº·¿?3Êxº·¿?=Ê
At 03:36 PM 10/20/01 -0700, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>
>Now HERE is where you need that microwave.
Fucking spammers are getting even more creative these days.
ot; also. Gee, that isn't even pretzel logic. Not very,
anyway.
Reese
Who knows how many predictions he's made over the years, or the
black book he looks them up in after a drawing, so he knows where
(whether) to call the press conference.
At 04:40 PM 10/24/01 -0700, Lucky Green wrote:
>It would have been more impressive had Copperfield revealed the
>numbers he p
7;s used.
Heat freon up enough, it turns into phosgene gas (as it breaks down
into simpler components). The CBR types call that Blood Agent.
Just think of how carbon monoxide supplants oxygen in your red blood
cells, that's what phosgene gas does. I do not seem to remember the
critical temperature but a lit cigarette will do it.
Reese
n is damaging to the
ozone layer. Try locating some R-12 for your automotive a/c system,
time was you could buy little 12 oz bottles in do-it-yourself kits
at every corner parts store.
Reese
_Data_Sheets/F-85312.pdf
>it says above 900 F Freon will decompose into hydrochloric and
>hydrofluoric acids. Doesn't mention phosgene,
Try this one:
http://www.vngas.com/pdf/g143.pdf
> although you'd
>proabably get that if the air was dry enough.
How dry will the air be at the burning cherry on a cigarette?
Reese
At 10:06 AM 11/1/01 +, Ken Brown wrote:
>Reese asked:
>
>> How dry will the air be at the burning cherry on a cigarette?
>
>Quite wet, because the combustion adds water vapour to the air. It won't
>be much good at physically wetting things, because the air is warm
uck this nation. Fuck it to death and start over.
You didn't really read the interview, did you?
The dumb cunt brought it on herself. Even you wouldn't spit in the
eye of a cop at your door and expect no action to be taken.
Reese
*yawn*
>You're an apologistic idiot.
You resemble a latah and your CDR node munges From: headers in an
obnoxious manner.
Reese
uch too cynical!
That isn't the right word.
Any reasonable person reading Declan's article would realize the
dumb cunt brought it on herself by being a curmudgeon and a very
uncooperative one at that.
Wash your mind out with some soap, both of you.
Reese
At 12:32 AM 11/4/01 -0800, S a n d y wrote:
>Reese wrote:
>
>> You didn't really read the interview,
>> did you?
>>
>> The dumb cunt brought it on herself.
>
>Yeah, just like all those other rape victims...
Read the article/interview.
Every airl
At 02:33 AM 11/4/01 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Since when are we required to be "cooperative" with illegal searches?
Why do you think it was an illegal search?
>And what's with the "dumb cunt" bit?
I calls 'em like I sees 'em, and boy, what she did was dumb.
Reese
At 12:51 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
>On 3 Nov 2001, at 22:20, Reese wrote:
>
>> The dumb cunt brought it on herself. Even you wouldn't spit in the
>> eye of a cop at your door and expect no action to be taken.
>
>Yes, you are right, she was se
At 01:41 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
>On 3 Nov 2001, at 23:07, Reese wrote:
>
>> equestrian would not have pissed the nasty guards off, I guess greens
>> think they can act haughty and snub everyone with impunity - wrong answer
>> (aka idealism = 0,
At 01:58 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
>On 3 Nov 2001, at 23:12, Reese wrote:
>
>> Oh boo hoo hoo. I shed crocodile tears. Truly.
>>
>> People flagged by the ticket agent, people who purchase tickets online.
>> That's what got her flagg
ml
In Godfrey's case I agree, but Oden brought it all on herself.
Reese
At 02:38 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
>On 4 Nov 2001, at 0:11, Reese wrote:
>
>>
>
>Maybe simple but a legal way of looking at it which must form the
>basis of dealing with such situations
Note that "legal" and "legitimate" are not ful
be begging for victimhood?
Reese
At 07:36 AM 11/4/01 -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
>On Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Reese wrote:
Me, to Tim May:
>> You didn't really read the interview, did you?
>>
>> The dumb cunt brought it on herself. Even you wouldn't spit in the
>> eye of a cop at your door and ex
At 08:07 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>Reese wrote:
>
>> At 12:32 AM 11/4/01 -0800, S a n d y wrote:
>> >Reese wrote:
>> >
>> >> You didn't really read the interview,
>> >> did you?
>> >>
>> >> The dum
At 09:36 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Tim May wrote:
>Actually, a person or business can "refuse to serve" on nearly any basis
>except race or gender or a few other politically-correct things. "Tim's
>Surf Shop" can choose not to wax the board of Reese, for whatever
At 10:30 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>Reese wrote:
>
>> Would you say greeting every police officer
>> you meet by calling them "useless pigs"
>> would be begging for victimhood?
>
>I'd say it's protected speech. If the cop can'
At 12:50 PM 11/4/01 -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
>On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Reese wrote:
>> At 03:10 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
>>
>> >Back to Sandy's coments Re: rape victims. Just because you got a
>> >big mouth doesn't mean you should bec
At 10:46 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>Reese wrote:
>
>> Yet that is how millions of Americans
>> are treated every day, usually because
>> their skin isn't white enough, their
>> bankbook not fat enough. Sound
>> familiar?
>
>All too f
At 10:56 AM 11/4/01 -0800, David Honig wrote:
>At 08:24 AM 11/4/01 -1000, Reese wrote:
>>
>>Would you say greeting every police officer you meet by calling them
>>"useless pigs" would be begging for victimhood?
>>
>
>No, it would be testing the profe
At 01:03 PM 11/4/01 -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
>On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Reese wrote:
>>>I'd say it was a good litmus test as to who should actually be a
>>>police officer. Anyone who got perturbed by such a comment has
>>>zero business being a law enforcement
Online Internet Pharmacy
Click Here
to visit our Internet Pharmacy(No
Prior Prescription Required)
No Thanks, please remove
my email!
63 matches
Mail list logo
