At 01:28 PM 11/3/01 -0800, Tim May wrote:
>On Saturday, November 3, 2001, at 11:06 AM, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>> http://www.wartimeliberty.com/article.pl?sid=01/11/03/1813233
>What else is expected in a police state?
>
>The soldiers say who can travel, and where.
>
>Fuck this nation. Fuck it to
At 12:04 AM 11/4/01 -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
>Besides, if this guardsman was as naive as you say how did he know who
>she was? As I understood it her name was on a list.
..."on a list." of people who purchased their tickets online. w00h00.
>Think about that, on a list...
*yawn*
>You're an a
At 09:47 PM 11/3/01 -0800, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
>On 3 Nov 2001, at 13:28, Tim May wrote:
>
>> What else is expected in a police state?
>> The soldiers say who can travel, and where.
>> Fuck this nation. Fuck it to death and start over.
>
>Tim, you are getting much too cynical!
That isn't
On Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Reese wrote:
>
> At 09:47 PM 11/3/01 -0800, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
> >On 3 Nov 2001, at 13:28, Tim May wrote:
> >
> >> What else is expected in a police state?
> >> The soldiers say who can travel, and where.
> >> Fuck this nation. Fuck it to death and start over.
> >
>
On 3 Nov 2001, at 22:20, Reese wrote:
> The dumb cunt brought it on herself. Even you wouldn't spit in the
> eye of a cop at your door and expect no action to be taken.
Yes, you are right, she was searching for attention but she received
more than she bargined for. The point is how did the fr
At 12:32 AM 11/4/01 -0800, S a n d y wrote:
>Reese wrote:
>
>> You didn't really read the interview,
>> did you?
>>
>> The dumb cunt brought it on herself.
>
>Yeah, just like all those other rape victims...
Read the article/interview.
Every airline passenger is going through heightened sec
At 02:33 AM 11/4/01 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Since when are we required to be "cooperative" with illegal searches?
Why do you think it was an illegal search?
>And what's with the "dumb cunt" bit?
I calls 'em like I sees 'em, and boy, what she did was dumb.
Reese
At 12:51 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
>On 3 Nov 2001, at 22:20, Reese wrote:
>
>> The dumb cunt brought it on herself. Even you wouldn't spit in the
>> eye of a cop at your door and expect no action to be taken.
>
>Yes, you are right, she was searching for attention but she receiv
On 3 Nov 2001, at 23:07, Reese wrote:
> equestrian would not have pissed the nasty guards off, I guess greens
> think they can act haughty and snub everyone with impunity - wrong answer
> (aka idealism = 0, reality = 1).
I don't really like the "greens" type of person as they tend to blame
eve
On 3 Nov 2001, at 23:12, Reese wrote:
> Oh boo hoo hoo. I shed crocodile tears. Truly.
>
> People flagged by the ticket agent, people who purchase tickets online.
> That's what got her flagged. Dig deeper, you are missing it.
> Obviously. Carry on, you don't need me for this.
What am I m
At 01:41 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
>On 3 Nov 2001, at 23:07, Reese wrote:
>
>> equestrian would not have pissed the nasty guards off, I guess greens
>> think they can act haughty and snub everyone with impunity - wrong answer
>> (aka idealism = 0, reality = 1).
>
>I don't reall
At 01:58 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
>On 3 Nov 2001, at 23:12, Reese wrote:
>
>> Oh boo hoo hoo. I shed crocodile tears. Truly.
>>
>> People flagged by the ticket agent, people who purchase tickets online.
>> That's what got her flagged. Dig deeper, you are missing it.
>
>>
On 4 Nov 2001, at 0:05, Reese wrote:
> The real story is that it was flagged, but not because of
> politics, but because she bought her ticket online. People
> who use Expedia, CheapTickets, LowestFare, Orbitz, and other
> rock-bottom and somewhat ANONYMOUS ticket services are having
> their tick
On 4 Nov 2001, at 0:11, Reese wrote:
>
Maybe simple but a legal way of looking at it which must form the
basis of dealing with such situations
> You still do not allow for attitude. "We reserve the right to refuse
> service to anyone."
Attitude is a very scary principal to which base passag
At 02:23 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
>> The real story is that it was flagged, but not because of
>> politics, but because she bought her ticket online. People
>> who use Expedia, CheapTickets, LowestFare, Orbitz, and other
>> rock-bottom and somewhat ANONYMOUS ticket services ar
At 02:38 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
>On 4 Nov 2001, at 0:11, Reese wrote:
>
>>
>
>Maybe simple but a legal way of looking at it which must form the
>basis of dealing with such situations
Note that "legal" and "legitimate" are not fully synonymous.
>> You still do not allow fo
On 4 Nov 2001, at 0:49, Reese wrote:
> What is precedent and case history of the "We reserve the right..."
> signs in public establishments, restaurants for example? How about
> the "no shirts, no shoes, no service" signs, whether food is sold
> at the establishment or not?
You can deny servic
>From Raymond D. Mereniuk:
:I kinda like a place where there is a rule of law and everything is
:totally predictable, something America appears to be moving away
:from at this moment.
--
But the situation *is* entirely predictable:
Some people in scary positions of responsi
Reese wrote:
> At 12:32 AM 11/4/01 -0800, S a n d y wrote:
> >Reese wrote:
> >
> >> You didn't really read the interview,
> >> did you?
> >>
> >> The dumb cunt brought it on herself.
> >
> >Yeah, just like all those other rape victims...
>
> Read the article/interview.
Did. I don't care if
--
On 4 Nov 2001, at 1:58, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
> What am I missing here? Was the prospective passenger
> carrying weapons or anything which could be judged as a
> weapon.? Was the prospective passenger deemed a threat to
> any of the other passengers or the completion of the flight
>
James A. Donald wrote:
> Let us imagine the following scenario.
> You are going to board a plane.
> Someone who is known to be, or plausibly
> alleged to be, a supporter of the
> terrorist movements the US is currently
> at war with, also wants to board the same
> plane. In that situation, your v
On 4 Nov 2001, at 8:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Senator Kerrey was cerrtainly a mass murderer, and the
> guardsmen who stopped her from flying were certainly thugs,
> but the reason there are arguably grounds for overlooking
> Kerrey's cynical murders and the guardsmen's thuggery ,is
> that i
At 03:10 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
>Back to Sandy's coments Re: rape victims. Just because you got a
>big mouth doesn't mean you should become a victim.
Would you say greeting every police officer you meet by calling them
"useless pigs" would be begging for victimhood?
Ree
At 07:36 AM 11/4/01 -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
>On Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Reese wrote:
Me, to Tim May:
>> You didn't really read the interview, did you?
>>
>> The dumb cunt brought it on herself. Even you wouldn't spit in the
>> eye of a cop at your door and expect no action to be taken.
>
>No she di
Reese wrote:
> Would you say greeting every police officer
> you meet by calling them "useless pigs"
> would be begging for victimhood?
I'd say it's protected speech. If the cop can't handle that, can't live up
to his oath to uphold the law of the land, than he shouldn't be a cop.
S a n d y
At 08:07 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>Reese wrote:
>
>> At 12:32 AM 11/4/01 -0800, S a n d y wrote:
>> >Reese wrote:
>> >
>> >> You didn't really read the interview,
>> >> did you?
>> >>
>> >> The dumb cunt brought it on herself.
>> >
>> >Yeah, just like all those other rape victims...
At 09:36 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Tim May wrote:
>Actually, a person or business can "refuse to serve" on nearly any basis
>except race or gender or a few other politically-correct things. "Tim's
>Surf Shop" can choose not to wax the board of Reese, for whatever reason
>it chooses.
That's right, whe
At 10:30 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>Reese wrote:
>
>> Would you say greeting every police officer
>> you meet by calling them "useless pigs"
>> would be begging for victimhood?
>
>I'd say it's protected speech. If the cop can't handle that, can't live up
>to his oath to uphold the l
At 12:50 PM 11/4/01 -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
>On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Reese wrote:
>> At 03:10 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
>>
>> >Back to Sandy's coments Re: rape victims. Just because you got a
>> >big mouth doesn't mean you should become a victim.
>>
>> Would you say greeting ev
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Analogously in Vietnam, the enemy mingled with the populace,
> so that even with the best of intentions, US forces wound up
> killing a lot of ordinary civilians, a problem made far worse
> by the stupid "body count" policy, where young ambitious
> o
Reese wrote:
> At 10:30 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> ...
> >I'd say it's protected speech. If the
> >cop can't handle that, can't live up
> >to his oath to uphold the law of the
> >land, than he shouldn't be a cop.
>
> Meanwhile, in real life,,,
Meanwhile, in real life, Reese wil
At 08:24 AM 11/4/01 -1000, Reese wrote:
>
>Would you say greeting every police officer you meet by calling them
>"useless pigs" would be begging for victimhood?
>
No, it would be testing the professionalism of the cop/pig in question.
Any cop who reacts to being called "useless pig" is, in fact
At 10:46 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>Reese wrote:
>
>> Yet that is how millions of Americans
>> are treated every day, usually because
>> their skin isn't white enough, their
>> bankbook not fat enough. Sound
>> familiar?
>
>All too familiar. That's why it surprises me how avidly Re
At 10:56 AM 11/4/01 -0800, David Honig wrote:
>At 08:24 AM 11/4/01 -1000, Reese wrote:
>>
>>Would you say greeting every police officer you meet by calling them
>>"useless pigs" would be begging for victimhood?
>>
>
>No, it would be testing the professionalism of the cop/pig in question.
Yep.
>
At 01:03 PM 11/4/01 -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
>On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Reese wrote:
>>>I'd say it was a good litmus test as to who should actually be a
>>>police officer. Anyone who got perturbed by such a comment has
>>>zero business being a law enforcement officer.
>>
>>I agree. Given the curren
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 08:45:05AM -1000, Reese wrote:
> of Nat.Guard troops for civil things. So long as they do not bring in
> regular active duty military, in violation of the posse comitatus act.
This shows a common but not entirely correct view of the PCA. You may wish to
read it for yourse
O-kay - the learning process begins. In every war we've ever fought,
we've learned from our opponents - if the political leadership gave us
the opportunity to do it.
Now we know the Talibs have small, heavily armed forces staked out NEXT
TO obvious fixed objectives. Our next assaults will be in g
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
> Ring a bell here? Green bad, Republican good, Christian good,
> Muslim bad?, or the other way round!! It would be very sad if
> America was to become this shallow!
Too late.
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Governments really
On 3 Nov 2001, at 22:10, Tim May wrote:
> This is why we are supposed to be a nation of _laws_, not of _men_. It
> doesn't matter whether these soldiers are country bumpkins or not: the
> Constitution still applies. (Scholars may opine that Bangor
> International Airport has "invited" soldiers
"Veja o que acontece com uma porta de vidro com 22mm de espessura
recebendo 63 disparos de armas de fogo em diversos calibres" ( Cenas reais )
http://glassage.com.br/video.mpg
Portas e Janelas de vidro que podem salvar a sua vida, já estão sendo
fabricadas em São Paulo, vidros finos e
At 10:12 PM 11/3/01 -1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Any reasonable person reading Declan's article would realize the
>dumb cunt brought it on herself by being a curmudgeon and a very
>uncooperative one at that.
Goodbye, Reese.
*PLONK*
-- Luthor //Remembering is copying and co
>Later, you can send out your posts anonymously and be viciously,
>uncompromisingly, honest. I think that's how some of the original
>'Patriots' did it.
As did the 'Atta Boys.'
This 'Blanc' is now in the databank of crowing terrorists, and will be
reluctantly quoted in the next national high al
Wanna see some SEXY, NUDE JAPANESE SCHOOLGIRLS?
Our girls are the baddest, nastiest, most beautiful
Japanese teens, and they love to have hardcore sex!
Cum inside and see them get down and dirty just for you.
http://212.107.196.183/members/japan/index.html
You will love our hot Japanese girls. T
Luthor, for the children's sake, come into the present: PLONK is
ancient rune of 'thanderals vapiding gas.
Hmm, like Luthor Blisset, hoary collectivist nym, which is not
to say all reds are dead just fomenting CDC misses.
>From someone who isn't really John Young:
:This 'Blanc' is now in the databank of crowing terrorists, and will be
:reluctantly quoted in the next national high alert. Deceiving the homeland
:guardians is treason.
--
But, it's not my fault!
As is said of girls wearing overl
On Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
> Your mention of the list and the guardsman being aware of this
> horrible threat coming through the airport were assumed but my
> thought was it was a local redneck or folks in a vigilante mood. It
> would appear this person was targeted. Whe
On Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Reese wrote:
> You didn't really read the interview, did you?
>
> The dumb cunt brought it on herself. Even you wouldn't spit in the
> eye of a cop at your door and expect no action to be taken.
No she didn't. She has a legitimate right to express her political views
of he
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Blanc wrote:
> Later, you can send out your posts anonymously and be viciously,
> uncompromisingly, honest. I think that's how some of the original
> 'Patriots' did it.
Actually I think they first sent out warning, tarred and feathered the
objectionable who ignored it while
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/htx/wjla/20011102/lo/gmu_student_charged_in_flag_burning_1.html
--
--
Day by day the Penguins are making me lose my mind.
Bumper Sticke
I believe the Constitution requires the Feds to be in charge of inter-state
commerce (see definition 2 of that word if you're confused)...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A32717-2001Nov2.html
--
--
http://salon.com/news/col/vincent/2001/11/02/libertarians/index_np.html
--
--
Day by day the Penguins are making me lose my mind.
Bumper Sticker
The Armad
It's So Simple To Earn $2,000 - $5,000 Per Week, Nowadays...HOW, you say?
With $1,000 COLD HARD CASH Commissions per sale . . .. Just For STARTERS.
We're searching for only 12 elite individuals with the work ethic necessary to
generate a cash-flow for themselves of $2,000 - $5,000per week, a
=
- FRESH 10,000 List added 11-02-01
=
For the more info and link to website, click below:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=EmailInfo1103
-->Do you want to start getting REPLIES for your offer?
-->Do you want those replies
NEW CD ROM is helping to Create HUGE FORTUNES!!
Free Info:
* What if you could make a full time income handing/sending
out a $1.25 CD ROM?
* What if the company paid you EVERY DAY?
* What if it was a New York Stock Exchange Company?
* What if there was no "real" competition, and everybody
"This Just In --- Internet to be rooted thru central FBR servers.
Death of the 4th Amendment predicted.
Movie at 11."
We have always been at war with Iraniraqistan.
--
"Four Arab-looking guys reading the Koran are much less
suspicious if they have the cards and can just slash them
through c
On Sunday, November 4, 2001, at 03:10 AM, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
> On 4 Nov 2001, at 0:49, Reese wrote:
>
>> What is precedent and case history of the "We reserve the right..."
>> signs in public establishments, restaurants for example? How about
>> the "no shirts, no shoes, no service" sign
Refinance Your Home While RATES ARE LOW!
Let Your Home's Equity Work For You!
Click Here for full details!
We can help YOU LOWER YOUR MONTHLY PAYMENTS!
If you are a homeowner located in the U.S., you are eligible to receive money for:
Debt Consolidation (combine all your bills into one!)
Home
On Sunday, November 4, 2001, at 10:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
> I think "overlooking" is too strong a word, I think it's more
> reasonable to call it mitigating circimstances. The guardsman
> needs to have it explained to him (in a way that the lesson will
> stick) that he does not have
By the time this article got forwarded to me,
the URL for the original article was gone, but the title's
pretty indicative :-) www.metricom.com has a "goodbye" page,
with pointers to the bankruptcy auction for interested bidders.
A google search reveals that back in September,
Metricom turned dow
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Reese wrote:
> At 03:10 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
>
> >Back to Sandy's coments Re: rape victims. Just because you got a
> >big mouth doesn't mean you should become a victim.
>
> Would you say greeting every police officer you meet by calling them
> "us
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Reese wrote:
>
> > At 03:10 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
> >
> > >Back to Sandy's coments Re: rape victims. Just because you got a
> > >big mouth doesn't mean you should become a victim.
> >
> > Would you say greeti
Reese wrote:
> You didn't really read the interview,
> did you?
>
> The dumb cunt brought it on herself.
Yeah, just like all those other rape victims...
S a n d y
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Reese wrote:
> At 12:50 PM 11/4/01 -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
> >On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Reese wrote:
> >> At 03:10 AM 11/4/01 -0800, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
> >>
> >> >Back to Sandy's coments Re: rape victims. Just because you got a
> >> >big mouth doesn't mean you should be
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Reese wrote:
> At the moment, it's National Guard, there is a long precedent for use
> of Nat.Guard troops for civil things. So long as they do not bring in
> regular active duty military, in violation of the posse comitatus act.
And it is pure judicial fiat. Guardsmen on
Tim (and other C-A-C-L proponents) have opined that a 'business' has the
'right' to refuse service to anyone for any reason. This is clearly
contrary to both the concept of 'rights' and 'free market' (and is
diametricaly opposed to what C-A-C-L proponents claim(!) to want).
Things don't have rig
C'punks,
The Gadsden flag is the only American flag I have any interest in flying.
Laissez Faire Books is offering a stylized, anarcho-capitalist (gold on
black) version of the Gadsden design on a t-shirt. I'll be picking up mine
tomorrow. Check it out:
http://laissezfairebooks.com/product.cfm
I prefer the Culpepper Flag, same motif but includes the red and white
stripes for the original colonies.
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> C'punks,
>
> The Gadsden flag is the only American flag I have any interest in flying.
> Laissez Faire Books is offering a stylized, anarcho-cap
http://www.usflag.org/gadsden.html
--
--
Day by day the Penguins are making me lose my mind.
Bumper Sticker
The Armadillo Group ,::;::-.
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Reese wrote:
> Working for the governor of their respective states, unless you're saying
> they've been called up by the Army and federalized. There is a long list
States are prohibited from having troops. Any(!) troops in the US (be they
military, guard, or militia) ARE r
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Reese wrote:
> States are not prohibited from having a militia, the National Guard is an
> organized militia, until such time they are federalized, at which point
> they fall under the Army's Chain of Command.
No, the can't except in cases of invasion.
> Why do you think al
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A36356-2001Nov3.html
--
--
Day by day the Penguins are making me lose my mind.
Bumper Sticker
The Armadillo
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash.htm
--
--
Day by day the Penguins are making me lose my mind.
Bumper Sticker
The Armadillo Group ,::;::-.
Buy wholesale direct from the manufacture and cut out the middle man!!
Save 75% to 85% on items you use every day. TonerBuys.com. BLASTS the
" superstores" and all "Internet sites" For all Inkjets, Laser
Cartridges, and fax supplies. Epson and Canon Inkjets starting at
$1.99. Hewlett Packard st
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
> http://www.drudgereport.com/flash.htm
Um, yeah, right. Amazing how every single thing we have done has been
"flawless", how what few casualties we have taken have *all* been from
non-taliban causes, how every missing/downed aircraft has been from "dust
s
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Reese wrote:
> Whatever Jim. Have it your way, a century of precedent means nothing.
You may want to acquire (and possibly even *read*), "Government By
Judiciary".
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human be
I'd never heard of the book before...
http://www.anthonyhargis.com/governme.htm
--
--
Day by day the Penguins are making me lose my mind.
Bumper Sticker
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Reese wrote:
> Whatever Jim. Have it your way, a century of precedent means nothing.
I wish
The point that the government is so far outside the Constitution and any
concept of reasonable 'American democracy' should be obvious, it is
usually the reason folks come here t
C'punks,
Friend of mine sent me this. I like the poetic justice of it.
S a n d y
> A Good Idea!
>
> All of the rubble from New York ... all the huge blocks of
> concrete and steel, the old busted up computers, refrigerators,
> hot water heaters, air conditioners, fire trucks, broken glass,
So ROTC recruiting uniformed american murders on high school campuses
is not disruptive, but a t-shirt is. How about those adverts reminding
male fodder
to register for the draft? Fly that flag upside down.
At 10:06 PM 11/2/01 -0800, Eric Cordian wrote:
>CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- A judge ruled Thur
- Forwarded message from Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FC: Green Party official refused security check, airline says
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2001 15:08:59 -0500
This Bangor Daily News artic
http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/11/04/scotus.mickens.ap/index.html
--
--
Day by day the Penguins are making me lose my mind.
Bumper Sticker
The Armadillo Grou
Ian Clarke (architect of Freenet) will be in Washington, DC tomorrow and is
giving an informal talk.
I'm hosting the gathering, which is tomorrow, Monday, November 5, 2001 at 7
pm ET.
Email me for directions, etc. if you're interested.
-Declan
AMERICANS: Get the IRS off your BACK -- LEGALLY!
THE SECRET the IRS is *TERRIFIED* you'll learn!
YOU OWE NO FEDERAL INCOME TAX - and never have!
Millions of Americans already have learned the
truth and have dropped OUT of the system - (the
IRS its
AMERICANS: Get the IRS off your BACK -- LEGALLY!
THE SECRET the IRS is *TERRIFIED* you'll learn!
YOU OWE NO FEDERAL INCOME TAX - and never have!
Millions of Americans already have learned the
truth and have dropped OUT of the system - (the
IRS its
If you are like me, you probably are looking for a business that is simple and has no
risk. My husband and I have tried many advertising systems and on-line businesses and
had little success until we found an amazing catalog business. It was very easy for us
to get started because the cost was
At 07:00 PM 11/04/2001 -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
>http://www.drudgereport.com/flash.htm
Drudge flashes about lots of things. It's nice to get a bit of context
besides just the URL, Jim...
This is the Pentagon claiming that the story about Delta Force getting shot up
during a raid on Afghanistan
At 07:02 PM 11/04/2001 -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A36356-2001Nov3.html
>--
Very strange - the article headline and subtitle are seriously
at odds with the contents of the article.
Sounds like the headline editor has much different opinions than
Bob Woo
(Ed. Note: Nancy Oden is a top U.S. Green Party
official and a
member
of the party's coordinating committee. An organic
farmer, peace
activist, and all-around firebrand, she lives in
Jonesboro, Maine.)
"Just a few weeks ago I had a piece in the Bangor
paper. It's on our
website,
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 07:01:43PM -0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
> Also, I don't see any evidence that he "strongly debunked" the story;
> he flamed it aggressively, but to strongly debunk something
> you need facts, not just assertions. You also need to have read the
Right. He claims the report is
on Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 02:39:52PM -0800, Sandy Sandfort
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> C'punks,
>
> Friend of mine sent me this. I like the poetic justice of it.
Terminal velocity of dust is pretty low.
Reports are that the bulk of the WTC debris are same. There are
structural components from t
http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/11/04/inv.ohare.arrest/index.html
--
--
Day by day the Penguins are making me lose my mind.
Bumper Sticker
The Armadillo Group
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A33340-2001Nov3.html
--
--
Day by day the Penguins are making me lose my mind.
Bumper Sticker
The Armadillo
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Reese wrote:
> You've yet to show how the airport departure lounge and check-in counter
> is the proper venue to address this. It isn't.
??? Why 'where' even relevant? If it doesn't apply all day, every day,
every place then it applies no place at no time.
As to a century
Eliminate your credit card debt without filing bankruptcy!
Are you tired of making minimum payments and barely getting by?
Are you drowning in debt?
What will buying this package do for you?
*It will TERMINATE your credit card Debt!
*Major credit cards only--(No department store cards or g
--
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Analogously in Vietnam, the enemy mingled with the
> > populace, so that even with the best of intentions, US
> > forces wound up killing a lot of ordinary civilians, a
> > problem made far worse by the stupid "body count" policy,
> > where yo
95 matches
Mail list logo
