James A. Donald wrote: > Let us imagine the following scenario. > You are going to board a plane. > Someone who is known to be, or plausibly > alleged to be, a supporter of the > terrorist movements the US is currently > at war with, also wants to board the same > plane. In that situation, your views on > their right to travel by plane will > probably undergo a sudden change.
Even in James' wildly exaggerated scenario, I see no reason to stop them from traveling after they had been shown not to be a threat (as was the case with this woman). Nope, political BELIEFS are sacrosanct. Show me a tangible physical threat or leave the lady alone. > The enemies of freedom, which this woman > certainly is... Decaf, James, decaf. S a n d y
