Title: We will help you get the mortgage loan you want
We will help you get the
mortgage loan you want!
Whether a new home loan is what you seek or
to refinance your current home loan at a lower interest rate and payment, we can
help!
Mortgage rates haven't been this low in the last 12 mon
Title: We will help you get the mortgage loan you want
We will help you get the
mortgage loan you want!
Whether a new home loan is what you seek or
to refinance your current home loan at a lower interest rate and payment, we can
help!
Mortgage rates haven't been this low in the last 12 mon
Get Paid to Read e.mail.
Very easy to earn money,Just read mail.
$2,000 a month guarantee.
Signup in free.
http://go.readclick.com/refid.cgi?refid=124186
http://emailcashgiveaway.com/members/index.cgi?cniftw
http://www.allcommunity.com/all.members/cniftw/
http://www.paymenet.net/refsignup.asp?Re
Legislative Day == Lobby your members of Congress for pork, regulatory
hurdles for competitors, etc.
LOBBYING Professional Lawn Care Assn. of America (PLCAA) Fifth annual
Renewal and Remembrance Project and Legislative Day activities, July 16-17.
Highlights: 6:45 a.m. - Environmental Enhancem
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20010715/aponline173031_000.htm
--
--
Nature and Nature's laws lay hid in night:
God said, "Let Tesla be", and all was light.
FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE
CONTACT: Ken Johnson or Jon Tripp
Monday, July 16,
2001
202-225-5735
UPTON ANNOUNCES HEARING ON MEDIA VIOLENCE
WASHINGTON (July 16) - Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI), Chairman of the House Energy
and Commerce Subcommittee on Telecommunications
- Forwarded message from Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FC: Massachusetts high court rules against man who taped abusive
cops
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 05:52:03 -0700
This is a fascinating case. The majorit
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Greg Newby wrote:
> This is a good opportunity to urge cp's who haven't yet, to read David
> Brin's "Transparent Society." It's pie in the sky, but essentially
> advocates having cameras everywhere, so that anyone anywhere can tap
> into a video feed.
Brin's scenario is sym
Eugene Leitl wrote:
#
#What we're getting (surprise, surprise) is that recording of
#the public is allright but not recording *by* the public. Mann's
#"shooting back" is rapidly getting outlawed.
I'm not one to make apologies for this sort of thing,
and perhaps I skimmed the articl
At 04:20 PM 7/16/01 +0200, Eugene Leitl wrote:
>On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Greg Newby wrote:
>
> Mann's "shooting back" is rapidly
>getting outlawed.
Heh, some of Mann's work involves pseudo-cameras (or dark acrylic plates
on your shirt, or leds under domes on your backback), so can we look forward
to
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> : After more than a quarter of a century in prison, a Black Panther
> : activist has won the right to a new trial. A judge ruled there had
> : been prosecutorial misconduct. The judge overturned the conviction
> : when it was disclosed the
Yes, this is correct. If you make a *sound* recording
in this state, all the parties present have to consent
(and, I think, consent). The issue is not that a
recording was made, but that it was made
secretly.
No such limitation exists on video recordings.
[FWIW, my opinion is that a police offi
In MA, the law is not just against 'secret recording';
the wording states that the "consent" of all parties
must exist. (It does not state what constitutes
consent).
PT
> --
> From: David Honig[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 10:56 AM
> To: Eugene
- Forwarded message from Richard Crisp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2001/07/13/museum_security_network/index.html
The case of the forwarded e-mail
Online allegations of Nazi-looted art inspire a
suit that could test the limits of Internet libel
law.
- - - - -
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > If those radicals were being murdered by the feds, the radical
> > left would have been eager to have them investigated, instead of
> > closing their eyes and looking the other way, and suddenly
> > dropping vanished radicals down the memory hatch.
On 15 Jul 2001, at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#
#The blank panthers and the rest were opposed to the
#bourgeois democratic process.
Is that some sort of excuse for the treatment I listed?
The Tampa Bay Action Group
http://www.sptimes.com/News/071501/TampaBay/Masked_protesters_fig.shtml
The Tampa Bay Business Journal editorial
http://tampabay.bcentral.com/tampabay/stories/2001/07/16/editorial2.html?t=printable
Gurly cypherpunk Aimee wrote:
#
#Critics of contemporary surveillance law point out that we
#increasingly live in a world where THEY can spy on you, but you
#can't spy on THEM. Governments, business and employers are like
#bad parents that say, "*I* can do it -- but you can't."
> Isn't the ruling not specific to recording the police,
> but that MA has a two-party recording rule?
Correct.
You might find it interesting that a number of states are considering (or
revisiting) visual recording statutes. One form has a privacy expectation
and exceptions for prisons, security
BTW, Mass. has always been "funny" about electronic surveillance. State
history is very interesting, and so is the law. (Early on, their police
wouldn't wiretap, it was not "gentlemanly." Ahem.)
Consider the traditionalist two-party states and ponder on the true nature
of the historical parallels
Keep in mind that the Mass. decision that started this thread
only dealt with *surreptitious* recording. Mann's "shooting back"
is still allowed even in Mass. as long as it's obvious what you're
doing.
-Declan
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 04:20:56PM +0200, Eugene Leitl wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2001,
I was thinking along the same lines as David. Stickers in windshields
would work. I've also seen folks selling the "these are my rights,
cop" cards. Seems to be a market opportunity to add another line to
them.
-Declan
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 07:56:08AM -0700, David Honig wrote:
> At 04:20 PM
Thank you for your interest!!
Judgment Courses offers an extensive training
course in
"How to Collect Money Judgments"
.
s4
If you are like many people, you are not even sure what a
Money Judgment is and
why processing Money Judgments
can e
Jon Beets wrote:
> police should not have the same
> standards as regular citizens
> when performing their public
> duties...They work for the people
> and therefore should be accountable
> for the people just like any boss
> should be able to monitor their
> employees
Some of you know Hugh
This University Degree Program removes the obstacles that cause adults to abandon all
hope.
You may know employers continually hire, promote and reward raises to new employees.
They may have ZERO skills or experience, but they are continually promoted just
because they have this piece of pa
On an adult level, companies that adopt "1984ish" employee monitoring
policies know not what they do
On a societal level, we are responding to feelings of pervasive
surveillance. "THEY" got it - we don't. Do we feel threatened? What we you
do? ANSWER: http://www.indymedia.org. That is more th
Wanna see today's hottest female celebs all nude and
completely uncensored? We have Britney Spears, Jennifer
Lopez, Christina Aguilera, Denise Richards and many more
all nude. Cum inside and check out the nude celeb action.
http://212.107.197.45/members/celebs/
Wanna see these teen celebs get
Matt said:
> So I guess the moral of the story is that if you must record the
> police you should do so clandestinely.
The Court addressed this:
"Followed to its logical conclusion, the dissent would encourage drug
manufacturers to mount hidden video cameras in their facilities so they can
capt
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 06:41:22PM -0500, Aimee Farr wrote:
> Companies with products or applications relevant to defense are wary of
> email from certain sovereigns. This is because they don't want clueless reps
> giving away bacon in an email pretext attack. The government has been
> harping on
Companies with products or applications relevant to defense are wary of
email from certain sovereigns. This is because they don't want clueless reps
giving away bacon in an email pretext attack. The government has been
harping on it lately. Maybe the rep got a talkie and is confused ...or
somethin
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Aimee Farr wrote:
> You can protect privacy without depriving people of the right to protect
> themselves.
Only a lawyer, or crack head, could have thinking that fucked up.
'protect privacy' is equivalent to 'right to protect themselves'.
--
At 02:29 PM 07/16/2001 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Anyone have any idea if any ISPs are refusing to accept encrypted
>email from "black-listed" countries?
>
>Or is this just a matter of NAI cluelessness?
The usual principle of
"Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by s
Ah, close but not the same. I was talking about cards that you hand
to the cops who stop you.
-Declan
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 02:50:00PM -0400, Greg Newby wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 02:26:46PM -0400, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> >
> > I was thinking along the same lines as David. Stickers i
Of course there is no law or regulation that prohibits individuals
from accepting encrypted email from the blacklist countries (or
an ISP from forwarding it).
Though perhaps government pressure or simple misunderstanding can
explain the situation you encountered. I'd be interested in any
verifia
, I'd say.
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010716/tc/tech_censorship_dc_1.html
...
Monday July 16 7:13 PM ET
Hackers Developing Anti-Censorship Software
By Elinor Abreu
LAS VEGAS (Reuters) - A group of hackers is finishing work on software
that would enable human rights workers to acces
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:46:20 -0700, Eric Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 06:41:22PM -0500, Aimee Farr wrote:
> > Companies with products or applications relevant to defense are wary of
> > email from certain sovereigns. This is because they don't want clueless reps
>
;d say.
>
> http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010716/tc/tech_censorship_dc_1.html
>
> ...
>
> Monday July 16 7:13 PM ET
>
> Hackers Developing Anti-Censorship Software
>
> By Elinor Abreu
>
> LAS VEGAS (Reuters) - A group of hackers is finishing work on s
Well, you can try calling the NAI number at 972-308-9960, and see
what kind of story you get.
I'm still trying to get an upgrade, which is what I called about in
the first place. I've been having trouble dealing with one of their
resellers, so had to go back to the source. This matter came u
Mon Jul 16, 2001-
Friend-
MAKING SERIOUS MONEY HAS NEVER BEEN THIS EASY
Are you Really SERIOUS About Making money???
If you are then Please do these two simple steps
1. Call This number now it is a 5-minute overview of our
business! Call: 1-512-703-6730
As you are l
At 09:06 PM 7/16/01 -0400, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>Of course there is no law or regulation that prohibits individuals
>from accepting encrypted email from the blacklist countries (or
>an ISP from forwarding it).
>
>Though perhaps government pressure or simple misunderstanding can
>explain the sit
www.xlportal.f2s.com - The S'X Portal - palace of Erotic fantasies.
Photos and pictures of hot brunette, sexual blonde, nude girls.
Come in, look and choose !!!
Good Morning!
From ROAR FREEDOM http://www.roarfreedom.org
Welcome to all our New Subscribers. Your
suggestions, comments and opinions are always welcomed at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In our New Articles Section http://www.roarfreedom.org/new_articles.htm
we have published the following Three
We will help you get the mortgage loan you want!
Whether a new home loan is what you seek or to refinance your current home
loan at a lower interest rate and payment, we can help!
Mortgage rates haven't been this low in the last 12 months, take action now!
Refinance your home with us and inclu
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Back to the original question: It's obvious that NAI is operating
>under the belief that some ISPs are complying with some unspoken BXA
>idea/wannabe-law and blocking encrypted messages from "no-no"
>originating domains. Is this really the case,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Back to the original question: It's obvious that NAI is operating
>under the belief that some ISPs are complying with some unspoken BXA
>idea/wannabe-law and blocking encrypted messages from "no-no"
>originating domains. Is this really the case,
from
http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/internet/07/16/fast.track.downloads.idg/index.html
When you log on to the FastTrack network, you are
routed by a FastTrack
server to what are called SuperNodes that contain
lists of user files you can
search,
July 17, 2001
Tech Center
Sony, Warner Agree on Standard
Aimed at Protecting Digital Content
By ANNA WILDE MATHEWS
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
Two big Hollywood studios reached agreements to back technology that protects
digital content as it moves between home devices such as se
I have had a look in our database and can see that you are not currently
susbscibed to newsletters. I have also marked your profile with a "no email"
flag.
I also take your comment on board and will build a link from the "your
profile" link on the top right navigation bar to the newletters manag
48 matches
Mail list logo
