Eugene Leitl wrote: # # What we're getting (surprise, surprise) is that recording of # the public is allright but not recording *by* the public. Mann's # "shooting back" is rapidly getting outlawed. I'm not one to make apologies for this sort of thing, and perhaps I skimmed the article too fast, but... Isn't the ruling not specific to recording the police, but that MA has a two-party recording rule? Everyone has the same standard of "protection".
- Slashdot | Recording Police Misconduct is Illegal Jim Choate
- Re: Slashdot | Recording Police Misconduct is Illega... Declan McCullagh
- Re: Slashdot | Recording Police Misconduct is Illega... Eugene Leitl
- Re: Slashdot | Recording Police Misconduct is Il... Declan McCullagh
- RE: Slashdot | Recording Police Misconduct is Illega... George
- Re: Slashdot | Recording Police Misconduct is Illega... David Honig
- Re: Slashdot | Recording Police Misconduct is Il... Declan McCullagh
- Re: Slashdot | Recording Police Misconduct i... Declan McCullagh
- RE: Slashdot | Recording Police Misconduct is Illega... Trei, Peter
- RE: Slashdot | Recording Police Misconduct is Illega... Trei, Peter
- Re: Slashdot | Recording Police Misconduct is Illega... George
- RE: Slashdot | Recording Police Misconduct is Illega... Aimee Farr
- RE: Slashdot | Recording Police Misconduct is Illega... Sandy Sandfort