Ray - it looks like Disappearing Inc. has been disappearing.com
for about 1.5 years longer than you've been disappearing-inc.com.
In October 99, Maclen Marvit, the CEO of Disappearing, Inc.
spoke at the Cypherpunks meeting in San Francisco,
shortly after they had a front-page article in USA Today
NOTE: THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT FOR LEGAL TV
DE-SCRAMBLER IF YOU HAVE NO INTEREST IN THIS INFORMATION
PLEASE CLICK DELETE NOW. THANK YOU--
LEGAL CABLE TV DE-SCRAMBLER
Want to watch Sporting Events?--Movies?--Pay-Per-View??
*This is the Famous R-D-O Shack TV Descrambler
You can assemble it
Dear Friend,
Give yourself the ADVANTAGE of enjoying life more with EXCELLENT CREDIT!!
Over the past 8 years I have perfected a system called the Proven Credit
Advantage Program. It's a guaranteed way for legally getting an excellent
credit rating almost instantly. Here's how:
If you have bad
Tim May wrote:
>
> At 9:23 PM -0400 9/27/00, Steven Furlong wrote:
> >
Tim:
> > > The point being that civil cases for damages should not be allowed
> >> for NONCRIMINAL issues. That is, a "matter of law" should be involved.
> >So, you're setting yourself up as the sole arbiter of the right?
>By the time the coherent radiation (needed to make an image) passes
Were not talking holograms, Jimmy-boy
Greg Broiles wrote:
>
> At 09:23 PM 9/27/00 -0400, Steven Furlong wrote:
> >You claim that the man's swearing at the woman didn't violate any law,
> >so she can't sue. That's probably false under Michigan criminal law
> >(anti-cussing law and disturbing the peace, according to the DA; I don't
> >
>>By the time the coherent radiation (needed to make an image) passes
>
>Were not talking holograms, Jimmy-boy
>
It is fun isn't it?
I think what he was trying to convey were the effects of reflection,
absortion and diffusion. Without having tried one of these devices or
knowing what wavelengths
>
>On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Richard Fiero wrote:
>
>>One could argue that all electromagnetic radiation is in the public
>>domain and receivable. However it is illegal to have equipment capable
>>of receiving cell phone conversations because the rights of the
>>telephone company and the rights of the
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, David Honig wrote:
>
> >Modularity *is* useful for keeping things simple enough to analyze, but
> >isn't a library with a well-defined API sufficient?
>
> This sort of highlights how the current models of shared code fail. A good
> deal of modularity and independence of cr
È David Ludlow and Liesbeth Evers, Network News , Wednesday 27 September 2000
Developers in the US have uncovered a way of snubbing the American equivalent of the
Regulation of Investigatory Powers (RIP) Bill, prompting speculation that a similar
system could be introduced into the UK.
The US
I'm having a very difficult time comprehending how plant
lights could even remotely be construed as "probable cause" -- don't the
courts have any idea of the millions of little old ladies (and whoever)
who use plant lights for their house plants? Or of the multitudes who
use them to jump
At 01:51 PM 9/28/00 -0400, Michael Motyka wrote:
>You're running these crypto modules on an MS OS? Plaintext is entered
>via the PC HW/MS Drivers and then exists in memory on the MS system?
>This probably describes the environment for most users, though not
>necessarily most of those on this list
from the clueless dept:
Why would I want a PDA-phone hybrid?
Why do I have the uneasy feeling the newly announced
Motorola/Palm product, due in 2002, may end up combining
everything Palm knows about cell phones with everything
The label "digital signature" for
nonrefutable cryptostrong sigs
is going down in flames. A DTMF
pulse counts as a signature Oct 2.
Tuesday September 26 09:15 PM EDT
E-signatures for 30 million laptops
By Ben Charny, ZDNet News
At 3:10 PM -0400 9/28/00, Harmon Seaver wrote:
> I'm having a very difficult time comprehending how plant
>lights could even remotely be construed as "probable cause" -- don't the
>courts have any idea of the millions of little old ladies (and whoever)
>who use plant lights for their hou
"Because the school accepts no government aid and prohibits its students from doing
the same, it
has the right to discriminate on the basis of religion."
from a story http://www.newsday.com/ap/text/national/ap170.htm
about a college for home-schoolers.
Re: why govt subsidized arenas
have to be
At 3:03 PM -0400 9/28/00, David Honig wrote:
>
>One very common security model is that the security perimeter includes
>the PC and you're only concerned with transmission interception.
>
>MS is swiss cheese but most OS have some weakness in many configs.
>
>How many people actually look at the so
Richard Fiero wrote:
>
> One could argue that all electromagnetic radiation is in the public
> domain and receivable. However it is illegal to have equipment capable
> of receiving cell phone conversations because the rights of the
> telephone company and the rights of the conversants could be vi
sunder wrote:
> Another option would be to get big huge water circulators and call it
> art - there are a few restaurants here in NYC where they have water
> running over glass panes. It's a nice calming waterfall effect. :)
That's a good idea. It should stop the laser-off-the-windows accoustic
Steven Furlong wrote:
> Now, I think your general point is right, that it would be somewhat
> difficult for a subverted programmer to insert deliberately broken
> crypto, and a very bet to expect it to stay in for any length of time.
^---
> However, if the privacy software comp
To: First Name, Last Name
Congratulations, your have been recommended to the
National Biographical Foundation
for inclusion in the 2001 edition of the America's Top One Thousand *.
Inclusion is absolutely free.
Please help us record your achievements
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Jim Burnes wrote:
>Guy likes a girl. Wants to have sex with her. She doesn't like him
>and does not want to associate with him because he's a boor,
>unintelligent, ugly whatever. She shuns him (as does every other
>woman in the village).
Shunning is rarely a problem if it
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, jim bell wrote:
>You probably don't understand how this IR technology works.
I do, actually. It's not all that complicated.
>Now, American police are supposed to work on the standard of "probable
>cause." While, thank heaven, I'm not a lawyer, I have experience with the
>h
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, David Honig wrote:
>Modularity *is* useful for keeping things simple enough to analyze, but
>isn't a library with a well-defined API sufficient?
This sort of highlights how the current models of shared code fail. A good
deal of modularity and independence of cryptography imp
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Richard Fiero wrote:
>One could argue that all electromagnetic radiation is in the public
>domain and receivable. However it is illegal to have equipment capable
>of receiving cell phone conversations because the rights of the
>telephone company and the rights of the conversa
25 matches
Mail list logo
