On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Richard Fiero wrote: >One could argue that all electromagnetic radiation is in the public >domain and receivable. However it is illegal to have equipment capable >of receiving cell phone conversations because the rights of the >telephone company and the rights of the conversants could be violated. That is one part of legislation I find completely unbelievable. I view it as a case of people having far too high expectations of privacy which shouldn't be kept up artificially. Sampo Syreeni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, aka decoy, student/math/Helsinki university
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Mac Norton
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Sampo A Syreeni
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Steve Furlong
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes jim bell
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Sampo A Syreeni
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes David Honig
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes David Honig
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Richard Fiero
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes POF
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Steven Furlong
- IR "TEMPESTING" (was Re: police IR sear... Sampo A Syreeni
- IR "TEMPESTING" (was Re: police IR sear... sunder
- IR "TEMPESTING" (was Re: police IR ... Steven Furlong
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Michael Motyka
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Harmon Seaver
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Tim May
- Re: police IR searches to Supremes Sampo A Syreeni