GUARANTEED way to instantly have EXCELLENT CREDIT!!

2000-07-12 Thread mike1
Dear Friend, Give yourself the ADVANTAGE of a new, legal, unblemished credit file in less than 30 days, allowing you to enjoy your life more by having EXCELLENT CREDIT!! Over the past 8 years I have perfected a system called the Proven Credit Advantage Program. It's a guaranteed way for legall

No Subject

2000-07-12 Thread a_z55
TIRED OF ENDLESSLY POSTING YOUR ONLINE CLASSIFIED AD AND GETTING NO RESULTS? The fact is there are over 7000 such sites scattered about the web and frankly none of them generate enough traffic to be worth your while. Even when someone does find or visits one of these sites, your ad is hopeless

Re: "Survivability of a minarchist society"

2000-07-12 Thread Marcel Popescu
X-Loop: openpgp.net From: "Jim Choate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I'm afraid that jail can be seen as closer to torture - even a libertarian > > jail. [Claustrofobia, lack of one's family, and so on.] I think I'd give > > someone a choice between being shot and being put to jail :) > > There are man

Re: how EXACTLY does this protect privacy?

2000-07-12 Thread Marcel Popescu
X-Loop: openpgp.net From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > an economy based on "nyms" is a pipe dream. No human has ever purchased > a car, or purchased a home, or taken out a loan, or started a business, > or gotten a job by using an anonymous "nym". Any significant economic > transaction, in both the real

RE: Fw: "Survivability of a minarchist society" CPUNK

2000-07-12 Thread Trei, Peter
You forgot: * Add a keyword to the subject line. This has several good properties. 1. Easily implemented in all mailers. Many users, for good or bad reasons, have to work with incompetant mailers which prevent PGP encryption, adding X-Header lines, etc

Re: Fw: "Survivability of a minarchist society"

2000-07-12 Thread R. A. Hettinga
At 5:42 PM -0400 on 7/11/00, Eric Murray wrote: >> * Requiring mail be encrypted to a list key. The CDR nodes decrypt it >> and send it out unencrypted. This will totally eliminate the kinds >> of attacks we've been experiencing. Unfortunately, poor integration >> of PGP with mailers cause

dutch crypto accelerator chip and compaq

2000-07-12 Thread David Honig
eet.com 10 Jul 2000 p 32 Pinjenburg Securealink [US|Europe] has a secure crypto module (battery backed ram, ARM, RNG, other stuff?) keeps secrets on chip; developed for banks, will sell to Compaq.

Foreigners with guns

2000-07-12 Thread Marcel Popescu
Can a foreign citizen legally own a gun in the US? [More to the point, I'm in Georgia.] I've tried looking around the web (NRA, Google...) but nobody talks about us poor foreigners :) [Even if I manage to remain in the US for a while, I don't intend to apply for citizenship.] Mark

Tim May (was Re: ZKS: how EXACTLY does this protect privacy?)

2000-07-12 Thread Marcel Popescu
X-Loop: openpgp.net From: "Greg Newby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Since Tim May likes insulting people publicly, I decided to broadcast > my retort. If you don't like harsh language and people insulting each > other, you'll want to skip this note. Yeah, Tim is quite an idiot lately (a few years)? He

Re: Foreigners with guns

2000-07-12 Thread David Honig
At 11:56 AM 7/12/00 -0400, Marcel Popescu wrote: >Can a foreign citizen legally own a gun in the US? [More to the point, I'm >in Georgia.] I've tried looking around the web (NRA, Google...) but nobody >talks about us poor foreigners :) [Even if I manage to remain in the US for >a while, I don't in

Re: how EXACTLY does this protect privacy?

2000-07-12 Thread Kevin Elliott
>> Can I make sure it is only being used for the reason I disclosed, >> and not for other reasons I didn't approve? > >I doubt that. In fact, I think it's impossible. In fact, I like that it's >impossible - it's THEIR information now, and you shouldn't have the ability >to prevent someone from u

Re: how EXACTLY does this protect privacy?

2000-07-12 Thread Tim May
At 1:10 AM -0400 7/13/00, Kevin Elliott wrote: > >> Can I make sure it is only being used for the reason I disclosed, >>> and not for other reasons I didn't approve? >> >>I doubt that. In fact, I think it's impossible. In fact, I like that it's >>impossible - it's THEIR information now, and yo