What's up

Are you looking for a date in your area? local young and mature men and women looking for a good time Just Copy and Paste in your Broswer onkandy.com/chick.html ceqwnaghebkocrhhgblmtj vjjqstichpkleffeynkv aiwhunltkbnkcpwxxawvtn ealzscqjcbfrupyooqrqoilpbhezzg ckitusvthqdfmyyydwgxdctndlz

what's up!

Hi, Here is the website you wanted where you can get a super lowrate on your mortgage. Website is here! Thank you, Frank Benedict To never receive another email again from us, simply reply and I will take you off our list

what's up

Title: VIP ROOM 92 dialysis builtin EVER WONDER WHAT HAPPENS IN THE VIP ROOM AT THE HOTTEST NIGHTCLUBS? CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT! BEHIND THE SCENES PICS AND VIDEO FROM THE HOTTEST VIP ROOMS! --- REMOVAL

Re: What's up with the Cypherpunks archive?

On Friday 12 September 2003 09:36, Jim Choate wrote: > Is it really so that there are no up to date archives? Venona seems > to have stopped a while back. http://archives.abditum.com/cypherpunks/ _But_ my server has been very unreliable lately. I'm planning on moving the archives to a different

Re: CDR: What's up with openpgp.net?

0 (CDT) > From: Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: CDR: What's up with openpgp.net? > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 18:51:17 -0500 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

What's up with openpgp.net?

-- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 18:51:17 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 2 18:50:39 2002 Received: (from cpunks@localhost) by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA31038 for [EMAIL PR

Re: what's up with *coder*punks @ toad?

At 7:10 PM +0100 on 3/11/02, Nomen Nescio wrote: > Hope you two have a lot to say to each other. :-). LOL! Whaadda hoot, lemme tellya... > The story is that a few months ago a disk got full and somehow the list > of subscribers got wiped. So far no one has one back and restored the > list f

Re: what's up with *coder*punks @ toad?

: Your request of Majordomo was: : who coderpunks : Members of list 'coderpunks': : : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hope you two have a lot to say to each other. The story is that a few months ago a disk got full and somehow the list of subscribers got wiped. So far no one has one

Re: what's up with *coder*punks @ toad?

At 7:43 AM -0800 on 3/11/02, Major Variola (ret) wrote: > Since subscribing to coderpunks via toad I've seen only spam. Is there > a better node? > Is there no coder traffic these days? Before my dns/hosting hiccup, there was some discussion about moving to another list, but we probably missed

Re: what's up with *coder*punks @ toad?

"Major Variola (ret)" wrote: > > Since subscribing to coderpunks via toad I've seen only spam. Is there > a better node? > Is there no coder traffic these days? There's the cryptography list at wasabisystems.com . -- Steve FurlongComputer Condottiere Have GNU, Will Travel The reasonabl

RE: what's up with *coder*punks @ toad?

TECTED] > Subject: what's up with *coder*punks @ toad? > > Since subscribing to coderpunks via toad I've seen only spam. Is there > a better node? > Is there no coder traffic these days? > > Thanks > > -- > Trade with all, make treaties with none, and beware of foreign > entanglements. > -George Washington

what's up with *coder*punks @ toad?

Since subscribing to coderpunks via toad I've seen only spam. Is there a better node? Is there no coder traffic these days? Thanks -- Trade with all, make treaties with none, and beware of foreign entanglements. -George Washington

Re[2]: What's up with the spam? CPUNKS

Hello David, Friday, June 30, 2000, 8:15:52 AM, you wrote: >> > I've replied to some of the spam with threats that I will track >> them > down and kill them. >> >> Heh. I was thinking more of contacting upstreams and seeing if they will >> yank the signal. DM> I doubt that they care either.

Re: Re[2]: What's up with the spam? CPUNKS

Vladimir Vul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello David, > > Friday, June 30, 2000, 8:15:52 AM, you wrote: > > >> > I've replied to some of the spam with threats that I will track > >> them > down and kill them. > >> > >> Heh. I was thinking more of contacting upstreams and seeing if they wil

Re: What's up with the spam?

Vinnie Chassot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Tim May wrote: > > > I've replied to some of the spam with threats that I will track them > > down and kill them. > > Heh. I was thinking more of contacting upstreams and seeing if they will > yank the signal. I doubt that they

Re: What's up with the spam?

At 5:48 PM + 6/29/00, Vinnie Chassot wrote: >and more importantly, is someone actually doing something about it? Did I >just volunteer myself for screaming-insane-anti-spam duty? > >And hmm...do people actually talk here anymore, or has this gone the way >of the alt.* heierarchy? > >Vinnie I

Re: What's up with the spam? CPUNK

Greg Newby wrote: > Someone mentioned a few days ago that just blocking mail > from [EMAIL PROTECTED] was a good idea to cut down on the > poop. If the "real" cypherpunks is no longer @toad.com, > it seems wise to, perhaps, remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from > the subscriber list to [EMAIL PROTECTED]