Greg Newby wrote: > Someone mentioned a few days ago that just blocking mail > from [EMAIL PROTECTED] was a good idea to cut down on the > poop. If the "real" cypherpunks is no longer @toad.com, > it seems wise to, perhaps, remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from > the subscriber list to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? I'm currently feeding everything that was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] into /dev/null - works ok. while there's still spam, the level is mostly acceptable.
