One of Ryan's Lackey's business associates, a Shia network engineer from
Southern Iraq, was killed in this bomb.
Cheers,
RAH
---
<http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-10/30/content_2159434.htm>
www.xinhuanet.com
XINHUA online
CHINA VIEW
VIEW CHINA
Monday,Nov.1,2004
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
> <http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-5238140.html?tag=st.util.print>
>
> CNET News
>
> Antipiracy bill targets technology
> A forthcoming bill in the U.S. Senate would, if passed, dramatically
> reshape copyright law
<http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-5238140.html?tag=st.util.print>
CNET News
Antipiracy bill targets technology
By Declan McCullagh
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
http://news.com.com/2100-1028-5238140.html
Story last modified June 17, 2004, 5:32 PM PDT
A forthcoming bill in the U.S.
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
> Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, a
> Jewish human rights group based in Los Angeles, said one strategy is for
> Internet service providers in the United States to honor anti-racism
> language in their own contracts.
<http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/06/17/online.hate.ap/index.html>
CNN
International conference targets Internet hate speech
Thursday, June 17, 2004 Posted: 10:14 AM EDT (1414 GMT)
International delegates are meeting for two days in Paris.
PARIS, France (AP) -- European neo-Nazi
So it is outrageous, irresponsible and violent for our
school kids to burn flags but it is
okay, honourable and peace-loving for our soldiers to burn Iraqi school
kids. That does not compute.
Christine Langtree
Townsville, QLD
Protest organisers enlisted Muslim students
By Patricia Karvelas and S
A Chokehold on the Gatekeepers - Identifying and Protecting Potential
Targets of Governmental Aggression
>> By Lawrence G. Walters
While the industry was bracing for an onslaught of obscenity
prosecutions against adult Websites, government officials were one step
ahead, plotting a
http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/internet/05/09/online.child.porn.reut/index.html
--
The law is applied philosophy and a philosphical system is
only as valid as its first principles.
http://slashdot.org/articles/02/04/09/1724257.shtml?tid=142
--
The law is applied philosophy and a philosphical system is
only as valid as its first principles.
James P
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,649917,00.html
--
--
James Choate - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ssz.com
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 8th Floor 24 Albert Road, PO
Turkish Embassy 60 Mugga Way Red Hill ACT 2603 Tel: +61 (02) 6295 0227/28 Fax:
+61 (02) 6239 6592, Web: http://www.ozemail.com.au/~turkembs/ Email:
turkembs ...
www.australiatravelsearch.com.au/trc/foremb.html - 26k - Cached - Similar pages
At 01:02 PM 1/15/2002 -0600, xganon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Valenti & other mafioso worried about wireless
>(consumer fair use) broadcasting
>
>
>http://eetimes.com/story/OEG20020111S0060
>
>"Content protection plan targets wireless home networks"
Val
Valenti & other mafioso worried about wireless
(consumer fair use) broadcasting
http://eetimes.com/story/OEG20020111S0060
"Content protection plan targets wireless home networks"
Let me get this straight... this idjut spams cypherpunks, and then
blames any trouble he gets on terrorists?
Osama H wrote:
>
> Show your patriotism! Put Osama in his place and support a good cause!
>
> Wipe with him!
> Shoot at him!
> Pee on him!
> Stick pins in his Voodoo Doll!
>
> Check i
Show your patriotism! Put Osama in his place and support a good cause!
Wipe with him!
Shoot at him!
Pee on him!
Stick pins in his Voodoo Doll!
Check it out! http://www.IHateTerroristsToo.com
p.s. Cool Patriotic T's too! Our server at
www.ihateterrorists.com was temporarily crashed b
Show your patriotism! Put Osama in his place and support a good cause!
Wipe with him!
Shoot at him!
Pee on him!
Stick pins in his Voodoo Doll!
Check it out! http://www.IHateTerroristsToo.com
p.s. Cool Patriotic T's too! Our server at
www.ihateterrorists.com was temporarily crashed b
--
On 22 Sep 2001, at 19:27, Rishab Aiyer Ghosh wrote:
> hey tim,
>
> maybe you remember me from the early days of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] just wanted to butt in here and reply
> to your post which i saw forwarded to some other list... it
> beats me why americans and the western media generally
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Rishab Aiyer Ghosh wrote:
>indians and pakistanis don't worry about nuclear war because we know that
>the nuclear tests were for attention - india has had the Bomb since 1974, and
>pakistan has been known to have it for a decade. india carried out the tests
>
attack india... and if that puts pakistan's govt in a
tight situation, well that's just a nice little bonus isn't it.
-rishab
> From: Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Avoid hard targets tomorrow
> If the growing street protests/riots
On Friday, September 21, 2001, at 09:02 AM, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> I think I may take a brief away-from-DC trip...
>
> >From the London TImes
> >
> >THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 20 2001
> >
> >Weekend alert as FBI warns of new attack
> >
> >BY DOMINIC KENNEDY AND DAMIAN WHITWORTH
> >
> >AMERICA and the
I think I may take a brief away-from-DC trip...
>From the London TImes
>
>THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 20 2001
>
>Weekend alert as FBI warns of new attack
>
>BY DOMINIC KENNEDY AND DAMIAN WHITWORTH
>
>AMERICA and the West are bracing themselves for another potential
>"Day of Infamy" this Saturday
ncreased their ground security.
The containment domes are spec'd to handle an airliner crash. Don't know
which airliner (707 vs. 747) and how 15 tons of kerosine affect it.
Chem plants, refineries & storage facilities [soft targets] all upped their
walking guards.
No more tours of se
I'm surprised there hasn't been a big effort made to
protect nuke plants. Seems like they'd be a ripe target for
terrs, either by an airliner hit or just by a large armed
group intrusion.
--
Harmon Seaver, MLIS
CyberShamanix
Work 920-203-9633 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home 920-233-5820 [EMAIL PRO
ist frowns on having articles redistributed to
attention drawn to it, I'll x out some of it:
From: Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat Sep 15, 2001 09:37:44 AM US/Pacific
To: xx
Subject: Soft Targets
On Saturday, September 15, 2001, at 02:27 AM, xxx wrote:
Date: 14 Sep
Black Unicorn wrote:
>If I were a duly appointed law enforcement official I could arrest you for
the
>kind of shoes you were wearing. You'll have recourse eventually, but it will
>be after a 24 hour (or so) stay in the pokey and posting bail and hiring an
>attorney, and
Yes, yes, and the cl
- Original Message -
From: "Petro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 3:38 AM
Subject: Re: Ashcroft Targets U.S. Cybercrime
> At 10:29 AM -0700 7/30/01, Black Unicorn wrote:
> >- Original Message -
> &
At 10:29 AM -0700 7/30/01, Black Unicorn wrote:
>- Original Message -
>> At 7:20 AM -0500 7/26/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Petro wrote:
>> >You are confusing "civilians" and LEOs. Only civilians are held to the
>> >personal knowledge standard. Leos are held to p
- Original Message -
From: "Petro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: Ashcroft Targets U.S. Cybercrime
> At 7:20 AM -0500 7/26/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 7:20 AM -0500 7/26/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Petro wrote:
>
>>
>> >a great majority of an LEO's "education" time is spent instructing them on
>> >how to determine [decide] what is and is not constitutionally protected
>> >{speech, action}. If they did not use this "ab
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Petro wrote:
> >Wrong headed or not, LEOs are manufactured out of human beings, and
> >because of this, the spend a considerable amount of time in the Maggot
> >Academy (tm) being taught the fine points of this very issue. In fact,
>
> No, they don't. Spoke with an o
I'm not sure which of the >s are Petro, Schliesser, Measl, or others,
> >> >> We still live in a country that has laws, and we *should* expect
> the LEAs
> >> >to enforce all laws that are on the books.
I think this was Petro, who I think was a Marine, and therefore should know
better.
The Un
At 7:39 AM -0500 7/24/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> At the risk of going Choatien and stepping far beyond any
>> degrees I may have, the position that each and every LEO in this
>> country *should* (as opposed to does) decide for himself whether a law
>> fits his understanding of the consti
> >> We still live in a country that has laws, and we *should* expect the LEAs
> >>to enforce all laws that are on the books.
> >>
> >> If you have a problem with the laws, it's not the LEAs fault, it's the
> >>legislature and the Executive branch.
> >
> >
> >And the Jewish population of Europe d
--
> > > Yes, it does work in the world of building reputations
> > > associated with (anonymous or claimed-not-anonymous) keys, but
> > > not when you need meatspace credit --give the meat named "Prof
> > > Joe" tenure credit for work X.
James A. Donald:
> > It is common for real world autho
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Bill Stewart wrote:
> I'm not sure which of the >s are Petro, Schliesser, Measl, or others,
These are not me (Measl), nor Schilesser, so that only leaves Petro :-)
Thank you Bill, for a much clearer statement of what I was *trying* to
impart.
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[E
> At the risk of going Choatien and stepping far beyond any
> degrees I may have, the position that each and every LEO in this
> country *should* (as opposed to does) decide for himself whether a law
> fits his understanding of the constitution before enforcing it is not
> only unworkable,
On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Petro burbled upon us thusly:
> Another point you bring up is that a LEO should not enforce laws
> that "clearly" violate the constitution.
>
> A LEO cannot do that *and still be a LEO*. He can refuse by
> resigning, but if he simply takes the position that he w
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 11:28:41PM -0700, Petro wrote:
> Will Ashcroft prove to be any different? I don't know.
Don't underestimate institutional bureaucracy or the FBI's
independence.
>A LEO cannot do that *and still be a LEO*. He can
refuse by resigning, but if he simply takes the posi
At 5:08 PM -0500 7/23/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Petro burbled upon us thusly:
>
>> Another point you bring up is that a LEO should not enforce laws
>> that "clearly" violate the constitution.
>>
>> A LEO cannot do that *and still be a LEO*. He can refuse by
>> r
At 04:44 PM 7/22/01 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Yes, it does work in the world of building reputations associated with
>> (anonymous
>> or claimed-not-anonymous) keys, but not when you need meatspace credit
>> --give the meat named "Prof Joe" tenure credit for work X.
>
>It is common for re
At 9:21 PM -0500 7/22/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Petro wrote:
>> At 12:32 PM -0500 7/21/01, Benson Schliesser wrote:
>> >> We still live in a country that has laws, and we *should* expect the LEAs
>> >to enforce all laws that are on the books.
>> >>
>> >> If you have a prob
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, John Young wrote:
>Why bust Dmitry and not the head of ElcomSoft if the
>primary crime is commercial gain? That he is claimed
>to be the copyright holder is thin stuff, for that does not
>support his being the main commercial beneficiary (unless
>the FBI has evidence that wa
On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Petro wrote:
> At 12:32 PM -0500 7/21/01, Benson Schliesser wrote:
> >> We still live in a country that has laws, and we *should* expect the LEAs
> >to enforce all laws that are on the books.
> >>
> >> If you have a problem with the laws, it's not the LEAs fault, it's the
> >
Matthew Gaylor wrote:
> There is little difference [between
> the two major parties]. Just
> continuations of the police state.
Last night, I attended a talk by science fiction writer and 2nd amendment
activist, J. Neil Schulman. To distinguish between the two major parties,
he refers to them
At 12:19 PM -0400 7/21/01, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>This was not a hotly-debated law, folks. Anyone who thinks there's
>a difference between the two major parties on this issue -- and I'm not
>saying Matt does, of course -- should get over it.
>
>-Declan
That is correct. There is little differen
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 01:55:12PM -0700, John Young wrote:
> > Why bust Dmitry and not the head of ElcomSoft if the
> > primary crime is commercial gain? That he is claimed
> > to be the copyright holder is thin stuff, for that does not
> > suppor
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dude, the Feds just arrested someone for "copyright violations"
> when no complaint had been made.
Dude, Adobe made a complaint about software produced by Sklyarov's
employer, Elcomsoft.
John Schultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 08:46 PM 7/21/01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, David Honig wrote:
>
>> All this argues for anonymously coded projects, etc. But that
>> means you can't get credit for novel research. This is one
>> of the ways that the DCMA is counter to historically unimpeded
>> resea
At 01:47 PM 7/21/01 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>As Declan and others have said, this may be the last time a DefCon is
>held in the U.S. (Not that other countries are necessarily better.
>Attendees in Canada may face arrest by the Mounties for hate crimes,
>for violating the Teale-Homulka censorship,
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, David Honig wrote:
> All this argues for anonymously coded projects, etc. But that
> means you can't get credit for novel research. This is one
> of the ways that the DCMA is counter to historically unimpeded
> research & innovation ---Its not rational for profs sans tenur
ch they'd like to turn
>upstairs.
Agreed. In the end, it's not Adobe that's the problem. Many companies like
the DMCA and many will use it to seek advantage in the market. Targeting
Adobe misses the larger picture.
A unanimous Congress enacted it and a grinning President Clinton signe
John Young wrote:
> But, to repeat, why the worker and
> not his bosses? Is this a way for
> Adobe/FBI/DoJ to signal the interest
> of its own bosses?
Maybe, but the reason to go after the underling is simple: He's far less
likely to have the personal resources to do much about it. Cowardly?
At 4:01 PM -0700 7/21/01, John Young wrote:
>Declan:
>
>>The problem with this analysis is that he does not have to be the
>>main commercial beneficiary for the charges to stick.
>
>But, to repeat, why the worker and not his bosses? Is this a way
>for Adobe/FBI/DoJ to signal the interest of its ow
Declan:
>The problem with this analysis is that he does not have to be the
>main commercial beneficiary for the charges to stick.
But, to repeat, why the worker and not his bosses? Is this a way
for Adobe/FBI/DoJ to signal the interest of its own bosses?
And why are the protests limited to Adob
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 01:55:12PM -0700, John Young wrote:
> Why bust Dmitry and not the head of ElcomSoft if the
> primary crime is commercial gain? That he is claimed
> to be the copyright holder is thin stuff, for that does not
> support his being the main commercial beneficiary (unless
> th
Why bust Dmitry and not the head of ElcomSoft if the
primary crime is commercial gain? That he is claimed
to be the copyright holder is thin stuff, for that does not
support his being the main commercial beneficiary (unless
the FBI has evidence that was not revealed about Elcomsoft's
internal fi
> We still live in a country that has laws, and we *should* expect the LEAs
to enforce all laws that are on the books.
>
> If you have a problem with the laws, it's not the LEAs fault, it's the
legislature and the Executive branch.
And the Jewish population of Europe during WW2 had no right to
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 10:18:25PM -0400, Matthew Gaylor wrote:
>
> Remember what I told you: "If you think Clinton was dismal,
> you're going to find out what dismal *is*, during a Bush administration."
This is too simplistic.
> [And Matt's reply is: They're both dismal.]
This is bette
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Petro wrote:
> Gee, imagine that, the Attorney General wanting to enforce crimes.
>
> What *is* this world coming to?
>
> We still live in a country that has laws, and we *should* expect
> the LEAs to enforce all laws that are on the books.
>
>
At 10:18 PM -0400 7/20/01, Matthew Gaylor wrote:
>Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 22:04:21 -0400 (EDT)
>From: Seth Finkelstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Ashcroft Targets U.S. Cybercrime
>
> Remember what I told you: "If you think Clinton was
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 22:04:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Seth Finkelstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ashcroft Targets U.S. Cybercrime
Remember what I told you: "If you think Clinton was dismal,
you're going to find out what dismal *is*, during a Bus
"Crime plan targets phone thefts":
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/newsid_1109000/1109234.stm
Apparently, Jack Straw (famously authoritarian British Home Secretary)
wants the phone companies to do something about street robbery of mobile
phones - now a third of all robbery in Londo
Haven't these writers ever heard of the Deutsch affair?
Home computers hold corporate secrets too.
COPYCATS LIKELY TO POUNCE
Since sample code exists, Cooper
expects copycats to begin writing malicious
e-mails fairly
63 matches
Mail list logo
