On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 01:55:12PM -0700, John Young wrote: > Why bust Dmitry and not the head of ElcomSoft if the > primary crime is commercial gain? That he is claimed > to be the copyright holder is thin stuff, for that does not > support his being the main commercial beneficiary (unless > the FBI has evidence that was not revealed about Elcomsoft's > internal finances). The problem with this analysis is that he does not have to be the main commercial beneficiary for the charges to stick. -Declan
- Rallies on Monday Len Sassaman
- Re: Rallies on Monday GeEk
- Re: Rallies on Monday Jim Choate
- Re: Rallies on Monday Declan McCullagh
- Re: [free-sklyarov] Re: Rallies on Mond... Seth David Schoen
- Re: [free-sklyarov] Re: Rallies on... Seth Finkelstein
- Re: [free-sklyarov] Re: Rallie... Jim Choate
- Re: [free-sklyarov] Re: Rallies on Mond... Seth Finkelstein
- Re: Ashcroft Targets U.S. Cybercrime John Young
- Re: Ashcroft Targets U.S. Cybercri... Declan McCullagh
- Re: Ashcroft Targets U.S. Cybe... John Young
- Re: Ashcroft Targets U.S. ... Tim May
- Re: Ashcroft Targets U.S. ... David Honig
- Re: Ashcroft Targets U.S. ... measl
- Re: Ashcroft Targets U.S. ... David Honig
- Re: Ashcroft Targets U.S. ... David Honig
- Re: Ashcroft Targets U.S. ... jamesd
- "Engineer for Haloid ... Tim May
- Re: "Engineer for Hal... David Honig
- Re: "Engineer for Hal... Declan McCullagh