Re: secure IRC/messaging successor

2001-09-03 Thread Pawel Krawczyk
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 06:41:18PM +0200, Eugene Leitl wrote: > Gale http://www.gale.org/ seems a well thought out infrastructure. Is the > consensus "this is it", or have I missed any alternatives? Have you seen http://www.silcnet.org/? -- Paweł Krawczyk *** home:

Re: secure IRC/messaging successor

2001-09-01 Thread Bill Stewart
At 06:41 PM 08/30/2001 +0200, Eugene Leitl wrote: >Gale http://www.gale.org/ seems a well thought out infrastructure. Is the >consensus "this is it", or have I missed any alternatives? Jabber seems to be emerging as the main cross-ISP instant messaging platform. I'm not sure how much security it

Re: secure IRC/messaging successor

2001-09-01 Thread Eugene Leitl
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Rich Salz wrote: > Gale seems to have a better security story, but Jabber certainly has the > momentum and large force behind it. How does SILC http://www.silcnet.org/ fit the bill? -- Eugen* Leitl http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204/";>leitl ___

Re: secure IRC/messaging successor

2001-08-31 Thread Rich Salz
> gale has scaling problems to large numbers of users, in particular > for group messaging. What doesn't? :) Gale seems to have a better security story, but Jabber certainly has the momentum and large force behind it. Plus, it's XML so you *know* it's good. /r$ -- Zolera Systems, You

Re: secure IRC/messaging successor

2001-08-31 Thread Derek Atkins
gale has scaling problems to large numbers of users, in particular for group messaging. -derek Eugene Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Gale http://www.gale.org/ seems a well thought out infrastructure. Is the > consensus "this is it", or have I missed any alternatives? > > TIA, > > -- Euge