gale has scaling problems to large numbers of users, in particular
for group messaging.
-derek
Eugene Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gale http://www.gale.org/ seems a well thought out infrastructure. Is the
> consensus "this is it", or have I missed any alternatives?
>
> TIA,
>
> -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204/">leitl</a>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ICBMTO : N48 10'07'' E011 33'53'' http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204
> 57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Cryptography Mailing List
> Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available