hi,
Blitz comes with high casualities.Shock and awe
technique can use troops paratrooping into baghdad.But
casualities are always unacceptable to the U.S. So
they do it the conventional way.
Sarath.
--- Ken Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tyler Durden wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > PS: Anyone notic
At 4:05 PM -0800 3/31/03, Neil Johnson wrote:
>- They don't want the US to be able to justify the invasion, "See we told you
>they had WMD, we had to go in."
If I were Iraq, I would make sure that any WoMD that survived the
inspections were destroyed and all traces removed as part of an
after-the-
Neil Johnson wrote:
> - Most important, using Biological or Chemical Weapons is a two-edged
> sword. They could do just as much damage to their own troops as to
> the US and UK troops if they make a mistake.
Might be interesting to see what would happen if iran felt threatened by
bush's aggressive
On Monday 31 March 2003 11:40 am, Steve Schear wrote:
> At 05:00 PM 3/31/2003 +, lcs Mixmaster Remailer wrote:
> >On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 22:35:55 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
> > > hi,
> > >
> >
> >What's the US line on why Iraq hasn't shot nukes, chems and bio
> >weapons at them? If an invasion and mi
At 08:25 PM 4/1/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Because they don't give a damn about Baghdad and most of the population
centers. All that matters to the U.S. interests are the oil fields in the
south and the oil pipline from Russia in the north. See my separate post,
"Oil on your French Toast: The 50 y
Tyler Durden wrote:
[...]
> PS: Anyone notice the conceptual similarity between "shock and awe" and
> "blitzkrieg"?
Yes, similar in some respects, though not the same. "Shock and awe"
(terrible name for a quite sensible idea) was about a military force
which is overwhelmingly stronger than its o
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 22:35:55 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
>
> hi,
>
>
> on the first or second day of the war-iraqi missiles
> hit kuwait-4 to 5 of them.
>
> After that there is no word of any more strikes in
> kuwait or else where.What is Iraq waiting for?
What's the US line on why Iraq hasn't shot nu
At 05:00 PM 3/31/2003 +, lcs Mixmaster Remailer wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 22:35:55 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
>
> hi,
>
>
> on the first or second day of the war-iraqi missiles
> hit kuwait-4 to 5 of them.
>
> After that there is no word of any more strikes in
> kuwait or else where.What is Iraq
