Re: [Reformatted] Eugene Leitl want to ban thoughtcrime,

2002-06-12 Thread Jim Choate
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Declan McCullagh wrote: > This is the last mattd post I'll see for a while, I expect, since I've > updated my kill.rc file. But the prospect of a cypherpunks subscriber > threatening to send 2 MB attachments to the list is not a pleasant one. Why? They make 80G drives now f

Re: [Reformatted] Eugene Leitl want to ban thoughtcrime,

2002-02-23 Thread matt taylor
Declan McCatohead scribbled. >>This is the last mattd post I'll see for a while, I expect, since I've updated my kill.rc file. But the prospect of a cypherpunks subscriber<< Lucky I'm not one of those,just a humble contributor. >>threatening to send 2 MB attachments to the list is not a ple

Re: [Reformatted] Eugene Leitl want to ban thoughtcrime,

2002-02-23 Thread jamesd
-- On 23 Feb 2002, at 12:33, Declan McCullagh wrote: > This is the last mattd post I'll see for a while, I expect, > since I've updated my kill.rc file. But the prospect of a > cypherpunks subscriber threatening to send 2 MB attachments > to the list is not a pleasant one. I like my enemie

Re: [Reformatted] Eugene Leitl want to ban thoughtcrime,

2002-02-23 Thread Declan McCullagh
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 03:57:21AM +1100, matt taylor wrote: > With 2189k attachments in multiples yes.Do you deny doing that now? (lets > not forget CoinTelPro's are about.) > I am a relative newbie so I am being attacked,until I figure out a > workaround I might have to repost the bounced post

Re: CDR: Re: [Reformatted] Eugene Leitl want to ban thoughtcrime,

2002-02-23 Thread matt taylor
>>I have no problem with nutcases, as long as they're not disruptive. You're being disruptive to this list.<< My 1st and only proof of this being 2189K attachments from you in my inbox? Where are the disruption rules and where's your authority to enforce them without warning.What about Choate!

Re: CDR: Re: [Reformatted] Eugene Leitl want to ban thoughtcrime

2002-02-23 Thread Eugene Leitl
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, matt taylor wrote: > You have to be an upover nutcase? Who banned nutcases? When? Where can I I have no problem with nutcases, as long as they're not disruptive. You're being disruptive to this list. > appeal?EL should know all about the soviet abuse of psychiatry. I don't

Re: [Reformatted] Eugene Leitl want to ban thoughtcrime

2002-02-23 Thread matt taylor
>>Let's recapitulate. We have a downunder nutcase<< You have to be an upover nutcase? Who banned nutcases? When? Where can I appeal?EL should know all about the soviet abuse of psychiatry. >>who's using this public resource for private dumping ground, << If its public it cant be private.It'