>>I have no problem with nutcases, as long as they're not disruptive. You're being disruptive to this list.<<
My 1st and only proof of this being 2189K attachments from you in my inbox? Where are the disruption rules and where's your authority to enforce them without warning.What about Choate!? >>I don't want you instituionalized. I just want you to behave borderline normally on this channel.<< I promised to do that several times now.I will even keep my number of posts under Choates if you like.Have you sent some of your sludgemail to him? >>Yes, it's public, not your private property. So stop dumping your trash here.<< Where's the definition for trash? With the disruption statutes? I deny dumping trash anywhere.Where are the 24 8x10 color glossy photo's of this alleged cypherpunk restaurant massacre? >>I try to track down and report spammers whenever it is possible. You're fortunately not hard to track.<< Dick tracy Uh? I'm not hard to track cos I'm not a spammer Dick. >>I don't give a damn about your death threats and profanity. Your ISP does: http://www.nex.com.au/support/terms.htm "The customer must not use their Internet access to annoy, harass or harm other Internet customers. The customer must not use their Internet access for any unlawful purpose or in any unlawful manner." Clear enough? Shall I pull up a number of your posts which are in violation of these rules you accepted when you signed up with your ISP?<< If you accuse someone of something the modern practise is to produce some evidence,yes.You began with the EL penalty phase in fast forward.Yes tell us what laws I've broken.You've broken the,"The customer must not use their Internet access to annoy, harass or harm other Internet customers."one.I asked you not to write to me and you re-sent uncalled for and very large attachments. I don't know if what you did is "unlawful".I'm seeking advice on that.I trust your ISP has similar rules? Pull up your dick. >>I had to change my filtering rules thrice to block you. This means you're not interested in being minimally disruptive, but actually trying to get past people's rules. This won't do.<< I repeat,"I deny altering adress's to avoid filtering and I can prove it."Your starting to sound like the Red Queen. >>Yes, you're absolutely innocent. Matt Taylor, keep up polluting this list, and I'll personally pull up the choicest of your fewmets, and forward them to your ISP.<< They might ask why you didn't say anything when they went up,compare them with some others and laugh,then ask you why your sending me large e-mails with attachments after being asked not to.I'm innocent till proven guilty. >>Who's thinking Matt Taylor contributes valuable material to this list? A show of hands? Yohn Young, perhaps?<< So after punishing me you now want retrospective approvals signed? How will the bona fides of the voters be checked? What's the Quorum? Where's the definition of "valuable material" again.I have responded to every crit of every post I have made.I am seeking to build the depth of understanding of the "anarchy" part of crypto-anarchy.I don't want C/punks led up some libertarian cul de sac.WTF is wrong with that? >>At some point you were contributing at least 10 posts in my inbox.<< Not intentionally or directly,move for dismissal. >>Returning all your emails to you is a below the belt attack? Huh?<< With 2189k attachments in multiples yes.Do you deny doing that now? (lets not forget CoinTelPro's are about.) I am a relative newbie so I am being attacked,until I figure out a workaround I might have to repost the bounced posts. Its coming winter so I'll have more time soon,real soon.
