>On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Petro wrote:
>
>> Choate wrote:
>
>> The only relevant question is whether they used force--in
>> this case the force of government to do this. In this case the answer
>> is "sometimes".
>
>At what point did MS threaten the force of government? They certainly
>threatened
At 07:09 PM 08/04/00 -0400, Petro wrote:
>Reeses Peices:
Sticks & stones - ah hell, Fuck You anyhow.
>>Try saying something good about Reagan, I wanna see if you can.
>
> He had good hair for a man his age.
The question wasn't directed at you. Since you've entered the forum, say
somethin
Reeses Peices:
>Try saying something good about Reagan, I wanna see if you can.
He had good hair for a man his age.
--
A quote from Petro's Archives: **
If the courts started interpreting the Second Amendment the way they interpret
the First
Burnes wrote:
>BTW: For 100 points name the three types of monopolies that can exist?
>Why can only one of them exist without govenment support? Why can
>only one of them exist temporarily?
Well, let's see if I can get this right, keeping in mind that
even though I'm a college graduate,
Choate wrote:
>On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Tim May wrote:
>
>> At 3:28 AM -0400 4/5/00, Tom Vogt wrote:
>> >Lucky Green wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I'd say that Phill is summing up the facts rather nicely. To all those
>> >> celebrating the "victory" of the largest Borg known to man
>>(the USG) over
>> >> Micr
>I'd say that Phill is summing up the facts rather nicely. To all those
>celebrating the "victory" of the largest Borg known to man (the USG) over
>Microsoft: if they can outlaw Windows, they can outlaw Linux. Anyway, at its
I found this http://www.2ndlawlib.org/journals/okslip.html
toda
At 09:58 AM 4/6/00 -0400, Tom Vogt wrote:
>both nazis and socialists to go GREAT lengths to not be associated with
>each other.
So do the republicans and democrats here. Some aren't
fooled.
At 10:24 AM 07/04/00 +0200, Tom Vogt wrote:
>Reese wrote:
>> >that's the point: last year.
>>
>> No, the point is that whatever monopoly M$ might have tried to bring to
>> fruition, if they even did, is crumbling by simple virtue of the market
>> economy moving in a direction M$ can't go.
>
>may
Reese wrote:
> >that's the point: last year.
>
> No, the point is that whatever monopoly M$ might have tried to bring to
> fruition, if they even did, is crumbling by simple virtue of the market
> economy moving in a direction M$ can't go.
may I remind you that "last year" means: the year the la
Marcel Popescu wrote:
> I'm sure others will point out, but I fail to see the contradiction. You
> might be a nazi, and nazis are a subset of socialists. [And you definitely
> expose socialist ideas.]
as I said before, it's even more interesting to see most political views
cram all OTHER views in
At 11:46 AM 06/04/00 +0200, Tom Vogt wrote:
>Reese wrote:
>> >get real. while there are no guns involved, and thus the word "force"
>> >might be debatable, the amount of choice available to a) end-users and
>> >b) resellers is far from what it would be in a theoretical free market.
>> >
>>
>> Del
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: David Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An interesting aside to this: If the average person isn't a little
> mentally deficient in this regard, how are the sales of books like
> "Word for Dummies" (or "Linux for Dummies" for that matter) and
> "Windows 98 for Dummies" expla
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: Tom Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> it's been amusing to follow these personal attacks. a few years ago,
> I've been branded as a nazi, now I'm a socialist - all by people I've
> never met and who haven't read anything by me but a couple mails. funny.
I'm sure others will po
David Honig wrote:
>
> At 09:57 AM 4/5/00 -0400, ... wrote:
> >Truth is, *NIX is too powerful - they fear the command prompt.
>
> Bull. They rightly loathe a user interface memorable only
> if you use it constantly. Which relies on recall, not
> recognition. And recall of cryptic spells, no l
At 09:36 AM 4/5/00 -0400, David Honig wrote:
>At 07:50 AM 4/5/00 -0400, Jim Choate wrote:
>How can you eliminate something that others like, without
>using force? Administer testing in elementary schools and
>re-educate the Torvolds and Stallmen?
much deleted
>Anti-trust laws are unconstitution
At 09:36 AM 4/5/00 -0400, David Honig wrote:
>At 05:52 AM 4/5/00 -0400, Tom Vogt wrote:
>
> >get real. while there are no guns involved, and thus the word "force"
> >might be debatable, the amount of choice available to a) end-users and
> >b) resellers is far from what it would be in a theoretical
David Honig wrote:
> >get real. while there are no guns involved, and thus the word "force"
> >might be debatable, the amount of choice available to a) end-users and
> >b) resellers is far from what it would be in a theoretical free market.
>
> News flash: the universe doesn't owe you the number
David Honig wrote:
> Anti-trust laws are unconstitutional seizures of property
> by the state. Intervention where there is noone wronged --just
> a bunch of whiny CEO losers. And a socialist national mentality that loves
> to drag down the successful.
you're definitely on the wrong track there
At 07:50 AM 4/5/00 -0400, Jim Choate wrote:
>Microsoft for years has done everything they can do eliminate or delay
>competition.
So who doesn't? Eat or be eaten. Responsibility is to
investors.
>The sole intent is to reduce the actual number of options
>available to the consumer.
The sole
At 05:52 AM 4/5/00 -0400, Tom Vogt wrote:
>get real. while there are no guns involved, and thus the word "force"
>might be debatable, the amount of choice available to a) end-users and
>b) resellers is far from what it would be in a theoretical free market.
News flash: the universe doesn't owe y
Tim May wrote:
> It isn't forced on everyone. I don't have or use Windows. (At least
> not since the execrable 1.0).
>
> Get your facts straight.
get real. while there are no guns involved, and thus the word "force"
might be debatable, the amount of choice available to a) end-users and
b) resell
At 3:28 AM -0400 4/5/00, Tom Vogt wrote:
>Lucky Green wrote:
>>
>> I'd say that Phill is summing up the facts rather nicely. To all those
>> celebrating the "victory" of the largest Borg known to man (the USG) over
>> Microsoft: if they can outlaw Windows, they can outlaw Linux.
>
>sorry if I m
Lucky Green wrote:
>
> I'd say that Phill is summing up the facts rather nicely. To all those
> celebrating the "victory" of the largest Borg known to man (the USG) over
> Microsoft: if they can outlaw Windows, they can outlaw Linux.
sorry if I missed anything, but who exactly wants to outlaw w
05, 2000 00:58
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: Re: Microsoft: A Day Of Satisfaction As Corporate Bully
> GetsComeuppance
>
>
>
> > GUILTY.
>
> > A federal judge appointed by Ronald Reagan, the most pro-business and
> > anti-antitrust president in r
24 matches
Mail list logo
