Reese wrote:
> >that's the point: last year.
> 
> No, the point is that whatever monopoly M$ might have tried to bring to
> fruition, if they even did, is crumbling by simple virtue of the market
> economy moving in a direction M$ can't go.

may I remind you that "last year" means: the year the lawsuit was
running ?

several of the statements made by witnesses during the trial clearly
show fear.


> The lawsuit is less about breaking up a monopoly, more about swatting a
> very successful firm that hasn't been paying protection money.

do we agree that there IS a limit, somewhere? that, say, M$ putting guns
to the heads of the dell CEO saying "use windoze or we shoot" would have
warranted police/government interference?

if you agree on that, all our differences are about defining where the
line is. if you don't agree on that, you'll have to accept that I
consider you a maniac and/or fanatic.


Reply via email to