"Dr. Evil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Microsoft does support encrypted disks. They do in Windows XP and I
> think they may have had it earlier too. Who doesn't support encrypted
> disk? The open source guys. There is only _one_ open source OS that
> currently supports encrypted disk in a n
On Saturday, February 2, 2002, at 10:58 PM, Dr. Evil wrote:
>>> Encrypted disks are still rare, but that is because raids
>>> that seize people's computers are rare. Of course it is
>>> regrettable that disk encryption is not part of the operating
>>> system -- but if Microsoft put it in before
On Sun, 3 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > http://einstein.ssz.com/hangar18
>
> These web sites announce lots of interesting beginnings.
>
> Anyone can start interesting projects, and lots of people
> have done so.
>
> The hard part is actually finishing them.
You mean like having a BB
>On Thursday, January 31, 2002, at 08:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Encrypted disks are still rare, but that is because raids
>>that seize people's computers are rare. Of course it is
>>regrettable that disk encryption is not part of the operating
>>system -- but if Microsoft put it in before
--
James A. Donald:
> > > it is regrettable that disk encryption is not part of
> > > the operating system -- but if Microsoft put it in
> > > before we had a strong, widely adopted system, they
> > > would doubtless muck it up.
Dr Evil
> Microsoft does support encrypted disks.
So they do:
h
--
On 3 Feb 2002, Dr. Evil wrote:
> > Microsoft does support encrypted disks. They do in
> > Windows XP and I think they may have had it earlier too.
> > Who doesn't support encrypted disk? The open source
> > guys. There is only _one_ open source OS that currently
> > supports encrypted di
On 3 Feb 2002, Dr. Evil wrote:
> Microsoft does support encrypted disks. They do in Windows XP and I
> think they may have had it earlier too. Who doesn't support encrypted
> disk? The open source guys. There is only _one_ open source OS that
> currently supports encrypted disk in a non-klud
> > Encrypted disks are still rare, but that is because raids
> > that seize people's computers are rare. Of course it is
> > regrettable that disk encryption is not part of the operating
> > system -- but if Microsoft put it in before we had a strong,
> > widely adopted system, they would doubtl
On Thursday, January 31, 2002, at 08:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Encrypted disks are still rare, but that is because raids
> that seize people's computers are rare. Of course it is
> regrettable that disk encryption is not part of the operating
> system -- but if Microsoft put it in before
>>A lot of doom and gloom posts have appeared about how cypherpunks failed
of their dreams. We expected to overthrow governments world wide by
tuesday, and we did not.<<
Its never to late to roll in APster or even mass civil disobedience if you
don't have the stomach for a fight.
>>But des
--
A lot of doom and gloom posts have appeared about how
cypherpunks failed of their dreams.
We expected to overthrow governments world wide by tuesday,
and we did not. But despite this the cypherpunk agenda is
still progressing well.
We do have universal strong communications encryption, i
11 matches
Mail list logo
