david wrote:
> Faustine, look up Faraday cages, TEMPEST, and search the archives. As
> if you didn't know.
I know, I was just hoping for a few meaningful shortcuts to achieving the
full combination of "do-it-yourself" (because tinkering is more satisfying
than COTS), "cheap"(limited funds; lo
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, David Honig wrote:
> Just because you're German doesn't mean you can say 'tight glands'
> without a snicker. 'Highly conductive gaskets' is perhaps less likely
Um, how do you know I wrote it without a snicker? ;)
Actually, I was referring to cable ducts which can act as a
At 07:07 PM 08/22/2001 -0400, Faustine wrote:
>Have you happened to have seen any good papers on constructing do-it-
>yourself cheap, effective, portable shielding? Probably might as well ask
>for the moon too while I'm at it, but it's worth a shot!
Back when I was playing with that technology,
t
At 03:31 PM 08/20/2001 -0400, Faustine wrote:
>Eugene wrote:
>
> > and switching to an emission poor system (chucking CRT for LCD
> > would do plenty for starters)
>
>Actually, that won't help you much: emissions from LCD screens can be
>easier to decode than those from monitors. Active matrix LCD
John Young wrote:
> Time to lay off Jim Choate, too, Sandy, smells like hysteria.
What, are they still posting to this list? ;-)
John, killfiles work great. Once you try it, you'll never go back.
anonymous wrote:
>> Someone seriously does need to start a node which only accepts posts
>> from remailers.
>Or a list. One thing you know about an anonymous message - the poster
>uses at least one cryptographic tool. Too many "cypherpunks" not only
>don't write code, they can't even use code.
Some damned coward hiding behind a remailer wrote:
> Someone seriously does need to start a node which only accepts posts
> from remailers.
Or a list. One thing you know about an anonymous message - the poster
uses at least one cryptographic tool. Too many "cypherpunks" not only
don't write cod
On 20 Aug 2001, Dr. Evil wrote:
> Who on this list has time to write code? We have important things to
Good coders are rare, and since extremely busy, are essentially invisible.
If there's one present, somehow: you go back to your coding pen right now
ere you get hooked on idle chitchat.
> dis
> Think they sent us to come put a stop to all the subversive code being
> written in here?
Who on this list has time to write code? We have important things to
discuss, like what kind of explosives work best, what kind of bullets
pierce what kind of armor, and what you should grab when the Feds
An Metet:
> It's also rather interesting that Aimee is objecting to
> people "cowering behind remailers". On the cypherpunk list?
> On the contrary, we should all be using remailers. Someone
> seriously does need to start a node which only accepts posts
> from remailers. I'm beginning to stro
On Sat, 18 Aug 2001, An Metet wrote:
> It's also rather interesting that Aimee is objecting to
> people "cowering behind remailers". On the cypherpunk list?
> On the contrary, we should all be using remailers. Someone
> seriously does need to start a node which only accepts posts
> from rem
It's also rather interesting that Aimee is objecting to
people "cowering behind remailers". On the cypherpunk list?
On the contrary, we should all be using remailers. Someone
seriously does need to start a node which only accepts posts
from remailers. I'm beginning to strongly suspect Aimee a
> It's also rather interesting that Aimee is objecting to
> people "cowering behind remailers". On the cypherpunk list?
> On the contrary, we should all be using remailers. Someone
> seriously does need to start a node which only accepts posts
> from remailers. I'm beginning to strongly suspe
At 05:37 AM 8/18/01 -1000, Reese wrote:
>Strangely, my dignity was not offended, I think yours is. That you
>came (heh) to Aimee's defense indicates what, exactly?
Paranoia becomes you. I didn't "come to Aimee's defense" -- I took issue
with your post. One can (indeed almost has a moral obligat
Somewhere it has been written that it is high chickenshit to
post a claim that it will be "my last in the thread" rather than
just not shit that last pile and then walk away a little distance
to spy who comes to sniff and shit on yours thus requiring
yet one more dollop of numero uno grafitti, u
Reese: (incited)
> >> Are court records public documents, or not? Why wasn't that info
> >> sealed if there was a problem with releasing it?
> >
> >There probably wasn't...agents go on the record.
===
> Why then, the subterfuge regarding the i
At 04:55 AM 8/18/01 -1000, Reese wrote:
>What can you exactly blame her for?
I can't blame her for taunting not-so-happy and not-very-fun Reese. Spare
me the cries of offended dignity; they hardly sound convincing when one has
little to begin with.
-Declan
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 12:52:09PM -1000, Reese wrote, quoting Aimee:
> >Agents don't get to use remailers and cower behind them.
>
> Cypherpunks don't get the power and sovereign immunity of the reigning
> governmental infrastructure to cower behind.
>
> Show me a proof that no Agent has ever
Anon
> Aimee:
>
> > "quite possibly" ...FBI "Black Ops Blow-Em-Up" teams?
> Uh-uhm. If had to
> > guess, I would bet that explosives take a lot of paperwork.
> Bombs are not
> > efficient investigative tools for law enforcement. They blow up
> the evidence
> > and the criminal. It's h
Reese:
> >> You are obviously
> >> willing and able to provide the real citation, so what purpose was
> >> served by changing all the names and obscuring the real cite, if
> >> trickery was not a factor?
> >
> >No, Reese, I didn't want to expose an agent to Googling.
>
> Are court records pu
Aimee:
> "quite possibly" ...FBI "Black Ops Blow-Em-Up" teams? Uh-uhm. If had to
> guess, I would bet that explosives take a lot of paperwork. Bombs are not
> efficient investigative tools for law enforcement. They blow up the evidence
> and the criminal. It's hard to run surveillance on a bl
Reese:
> >[Some cpunk] wrote:
> >
> >>You are familiar with the terms "FUD" and "Propaganda" aren't you,
> >>Aimee? Is there a real case that can be cited properly?
> >
> >Accusing me of trickery on the tribunal? Himf. See US v. EATON,
> >No 00-1276 (10th Cir. August 14, 2001).
>
> Skimme
[BLR has recently been the subject of media attacks and poison pen letters.]
"Bombmonger" wrote:
> Amusing, Aimee -- or is it "Amusing Aimee"? But the real discussion
> was about protected speech, was it not? You previously posted a piece on
> "842" as if that were an actual statute forbiddi
23 matches
Mail list logo
