Reese:
> >> You are obviously
> >> willing and able to provide the real citation, so what purpose was
> >> served by changing all the names and obscuring the real cite, if
> >> trickery was not a factor?
> >
> >No, Reese, I didn't want to expose an agent to Googling.
>
> Are court records public documents, or not? Why wasn't that info sealed
> if there was a problem with releasing it?
There probably wasn't...agents go on the record. Agents don't get to use
remailers and cower behind them.
> >> Talking about yelling "Fire" in a crowded theater is not the same as
> >> doing it, no matter how "is" is defined, talking about bombs
> and making
> >> them is no different. Who was it? Said "I disagree with what you say
> >> but support your right to say it" or words to that effect?
> >
> >A modern version: "I disagree with bomb recipes, but support
> your right to
> >provide bomb recipes, as long as I am not standing next to you, or
> >associated with you in any way." Things work differently now, see?
>
> No, I don't *see*. There is no reason why they should work differently,
> the relevant passages of the Constitution have not changed - the activism
> in the courtrooms is telling though.
I was being sarcastic.
Do you think you need probable cause for investigation?
~Aimee
