RE: [PATCH] Update 2 - Setup.exe property sheet patch

2002-01-07 Thread "Schaible, Jörg"
Hi Robert, >> "Once virtual, always virtual", i.e., it isn't necessary to add >"virtual" to >> any overridden virtual functions, and in fact it's not possible to >> "unvirtualize" once virtualized. I do try to maintain them as a >stylistic >> convention, but even I fall short sometimes ;-). Tha

Re: [PATCH] Update 2 - Setup.exe property sheet patch

2002-01-07 Thread Robert Collins
I'm sorry Jorg, but I don't have the standard to reference. Do you know of an on-line copy? (Googling for "c++ standard 10.3.2" gave me lots of useless hits :}) I got my info from the C++ FAQS second edition (Cline Lomow & Girou), FAQ 33.09. Rob === - Original Message - From: "Schaible,

getsem cleanup

2002-01-07 Thread Robert Collins
My first foray into signals... ChangeLog: 2002-01-08 Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] * sigproc.cc (getsem): Rearrange code to be more readable, and to always output an error if accessing or creating the semaphore fails. getsem.patch Description: Binary data

FW: [PATCH] Update 2 - Setup.exe property sheet patch

2002-01-07 Thread "Schaible, Jörg"
did not recognize, that Robert mailed twice - one private, one to the list -Original Message- From: Schaible, Jörg Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:24 PM To: 'Robert Collins' Subject: RE: [PATCH] Update 2 - Setup.exe property sheet patch Hi Robert, unfortunately is this document not f

Re: getsem cleanup

2002-01-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 01:03:45AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >My first foray into signals... > >ChangeLog: > >2002-01-08 Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >* sigproc.cc (getsem): Rearrange code to be more readable, and to >always output an error if accessing or creating the semaphore

Re: getsem cleanup

2002-01-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:41:40AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 01:03:45AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >>My first foray into signals... >> >>ChangeLog: >> >>2002-01-08 Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>* sigproc.cc (getsem): Rearrange code to be more readabl

Re: getsem cleanup

2002-01-07 Thread Robert Collins
=== - Original Message - From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > If I'm reading the patch correctly, it changes the behavior of cygwin so > that cygwin will output an error in the case of a failing OpenSemaphore. > That's not right. The current behavior is correct. The only ti

Re: getsem cleanup

2002-01-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 09:11:00AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >=== >- Original Message - >From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> If I'm reading the patch correctly, it changes the behavior of cygwin >so >> that cygwin will output an error in the case of a failing >OpenSema

Re: getsem cleanup

2002-01-07 Thread Robert Collins
=== - Original Message - From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > system_printf goes to the screen. Doh. Do I need a braile screen or what? Rob

[PATCH] Setup.exe page navigation when using local dir install

2002-01-07 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
This should make moving around a little easier. -- Gary R. Van Sickle Brewer. Patriot. setup.diff Description: Binary data ChangeLog.setup.grvs Description: Binary data

Re: [PATCH] Setup.exe page navigation when using local dir install

2002-01-07 Thread Robert Collins
Glad to see it was trivial. I'm slowly grokking your code :]. Would you like to write a few words - a 'how pages work.txt' file? I'll check this in shortly. === - Original Message - From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Cygwin-Patches" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, J