On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 09:11:00AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >=== >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> If I'm reading the patch correctly, it changes the behavior of cygwin >so >> that cygwin will output an error in the case of a failing >OpenSemaphore. >> That's not right. The current behavior is correct. The only time you >> should see an error is when the process is creating a semaphore for >> itself. It should always be able to do that. >> >> I'll clean up the code in getsem a little to make this more obvious. > >Ok. I thought there was a bug because the error line has >p ? "open" : "create" :}
That's a holdover from earlier code. >Te error line only goes to strace in any event... system_printf goes to the screen. cgf
