On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:05:42PM +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > Me neither. Perhaps it's ok to implement it just based on the
> > description (if any and if it's at all possible)?!?
>
> For NT and 95: every interface which is not ppp is co
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Me neither. Perhaps it's ok to implement it just based on the
> description (if any and if it's at all possible)?!?
For NT and 95: every interface which is not ppp is considered as eth type.
This is not correct, but at least they're listed. I've se
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 03:04:29PM +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:18:58PM +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> > > Hi, the patch adds support for enumerating tokenring network interfaces.
> >
> > It does so for system
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:18:58PM +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> > Hi, the patch adds support for enumerating tokenring network interfaces.
>
> It does so for systems with IPHelper Lib only, unfortunately.
> Do you also have a way to add it for
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:18:58PM +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> Hi, the patch adds support for enumerating tokenring network interfaces.
It does so for systems with IPHelper Lib only, unfortunately.
Do you also have a way to add it for the rest of the crowd?
Corinna
>
> bye
> ago
> --
