On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:05:42PM +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote: > On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > Me neither. Perhaps it's ok to implement it just based on the > > description (if any and if it's at all possible)?!? > > For NT and 95: every interface which is not ppp is considered as eth type. > This is not correct, but at least they're listed. I've searched the msdn > but found no information where and how it is coded that an network inter- > face is tokenring or ethernet or something else. > > The Problem with the 2k implementation was that the tokenring adapters > were left out and xfree could not find the correct interface for the local > ip-address.
Ok, I have applied your patch as is. Thanks! Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
