On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 11:49:49AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>>> OK. But now...do we need any additional discussion of the patch itself,
>>> or did we cover that sufficiently on cygwin-developers?
>>
>> If you've, as you say "tested" this,
>
>Yep, and no scare-quote
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> OK. But now...do we need any additional discussion of the patch itself,
>> or did we cover that sufficiently on cygwin-developers?
>
> If you've, as you say "tested" this,
Yep, and no scare-quotes needed .
> I think we should get this in ASAP.
OK. Committed as pos
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 09:32:10AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> Make the checkin and the ChangeLog one lump. The ChangeLog entry is
>> about the work done to put this stuff into Cygwin, which was your work.
>> Don't repeat the mingw entry, rather just say that you impor
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Make the checkin and the ChangeLog one lump. The ChangeLog entry is
> about the work done to put this stuff into Cygwin, which was your work.
> Don't repeat the mingw entry, rather just say that you imported from
> there and credit Kai with that entry.
>
> Something like
On Oct 6 23:03, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:14:59PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >I just figured it made sense to split up the ChangeLog, because I didn't
> >want to take credit for Kai's changes, but I did want to document what I
> >did, beyond the mingw/ version (whi
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:14:59PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:53:54PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>>Hence, three separate "entries". One question: when it comes time to
>>>commit this to CVS, should it be done all in one lump, or 1-2-3 very
>>>quick separate commit
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:53:54PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>Hence, three separate "entries". One question: when it comes time to
>>commit this to CVS, should it be done all in one lump, or 1-2-3 very
>>quick separate commits (even though the tree would be broken between,
>>say, #1 and #2)?
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:53:54PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>As discussed on cygwin-developers...
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2009-10/msg00052.html
>and thread. Please refer to that thread for the justification of this
>patch, and some of the details of its evolution.
>
>The changel
