On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:53:54PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >As discussed on cygwin-developers... >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2009-10/msg00052.html >and thread. Please refer to that thread for the justification of this >patch, and some of the details of its evolution. > >The changelog entry below is somewhat odd (multiple sections) because of >the licensing differences in the various files. Kai's only contribution >was to the pseudo-reloc.c code, which is entirely public domain (and he >placed his contributions to that file into the public domain, as well). >Similarly, my contributions to pseudo-reloc.c are also public domain. > >Bowever, the changes to the other cygwin files are mine and are covered >by assignment to Red Hat. > >Hence, three separate "entries". One question: when it comes time to >commit this to CVS, should it be done all in one lump, or 1-2-3 very >quick separate commits (even though the tree would be broken between, >say, #1 and #2)?
I don't see why you shouldn't check in everything together since it's all one "change set". It's not like you could just back out Kai's changes individually and still get a working cygwin, right? cgf
