On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:02:07AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>If Thomas wants to send me, via private email, a scanned, signed copy of
>the assignment form that would be great, too.
I've gotten a copy of Thomas's assignment (it was a personal assignment so
I assume that he does not have an
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:12:53PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
>> Sent: Wednesday, 5 June 2002 11:09 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
> Sent: Wednesday, 5 June 2002 11:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] minor pthread fixes
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 10:44:54PM
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 10:44:54PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Ok, Chris, whats the guideline in nuber-of-line before we need an
> assignment? Do I need to back out this patch (it's very few lines, just
> spread over a few functions).
I'm not Chris, sorry, but the answer is basically something
AIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] minor pthread fixes
>
>
>
> Thank you.
> BTW i realized that Chris hasn't got an assignment from me yet.
> I will send one in the next days.
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
&g
> > Sent: Thursday, 18 April 2002 8:11 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [PATCH] minor pthread fixes
> >
> >
> >
> > This patch contains some small pthread fixes:
>
> Rob
>
Thanks, applied.
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Pfaff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 18 April 2002 8:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PATCH] minor pthread fixes
>
>
>
> This patch contains some small pthread fixes:
Rob
e:908-672-7592 O-
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 7:49 AM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] minor pthread fixes
>
>
> Rob,
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 0
Rob,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 09:37:04PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> From memory - no. Alsothe symptoms are wrong - the test hangs, not
> prematurely exiting. Anyway, it shouldn't be too hard to build a test
> .dll and give it a try. If you want I can shoot such a beast over to
> you.
No, tha
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:38 PM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: Thomas Pfaff; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] minor pthread fixes
>
>
> Rob,
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at
Rob,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 08:31:52AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:58 PM
> >
> > Could #2 have caused the problem that we saw with Python's
> > test_threadedtempfile regress
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:58 PM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: Thomas Pfaff; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] minor pthread fixes
>
>
> Rob,
>
> On Thu, Apr 18,
Rob,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 09:31:15PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Regarding 2:, again a good catch.
Could #2 have caused the problem that we saw with Python's
test_threadedtempfile regression test?
Thanks,
Jason
, again a good catch.
I'll commit this to CVS this weekend, I've a bit of spare time coming
up.
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Pfaff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PATCH] minor
This patch contains some small pthread fixes:
1. the pthread class allocated in __pthread_create never was freed. This
resulted in a memory leak and an unclosed handle.
Depending on the state of of the thread it is deleted now in
__pthread_exit or __pthread_join
2. The InterlockedIncrem
15 matches
Mail list logo
