On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:12:53PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen >> Sent: Wednesday, 5 June 2002 11:09 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] minor pthread fixes >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 10:44:54PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >> > Ok, Chris, whats the guideline in nuber-of-line before we need an >> > assignment? Do I need to back out this patch (it's very few >> lines, just >> > spread over a few functions). >> >> I'm not Chris, sorry > >That's ok, you being a RedHat employee and all :}. > >> , but the answer is basically something below >> 10 changed lines is treated as "nonsignificant". There's no hard >> rule, though. Basically, if a change is not only fixing a bug but >> introduces new functionality, it's a "significant" patch, even if >> it's changing less than 10 lines. > >Hmm. I'll look carefully at the remaining patches to see if there is new >functionality or just bugfixes. The current one should be fine though >IMO.
It sounds like it is ok. I trust your judgement, on this, Robert. I'm willing to put the patch in the sources on a promise of an assignment being forthcoming, too. I just won't pull the sources into our internal repository until I get the assignment. If Thomas wants to send me, via private email, a scanned, signed copy of the assignment form that would be great, too. cgf
