On Jan 8 10:49, Ray Donnelly wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jan 7 18:15, Ray Donnelly wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> > On Dec 22 01:03, Ray Donnelly wrote:
> >> >> I hope this is OK and I've done it in the best pla
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 7 18:15, Ray Donnelly wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> > On Dec 22 01:03, Ray Donnelly wrote:
>> >> I hope this is OK and I've done it in the best place. Please advise if
>> >> it needs any changes
On Jan 7 18:15, Ray Donnelly wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Dec 22 01:03, Ray Donnelly wrote:
> >> I hope this is OK and I've done it in the best place. Please advise if
> >> it needs any changes.
> >
> > I have no idea if this is ok. This is a patch to a
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec 22 01:03, Ray Donnelly wrote:
>> I hope this is OK and I've done it in the best place. Please advise if
>> it needs any changes.
>
> I have no idea if this is ok. This is a patch to a very crucial
> function in terms of path handling
On Dec 22 01:03, Ray Donnelly wrote:
> I hope this is OK and I've done it in the best place. Please advise if
> it needs any changes.
I have no idea if this is ok. This is a patch to a very crucial
function in terms of path handling, and it's not clear that this isn't
doing the wrong thing. What
I hope this is OK and I've done it in the best place. Please advise if
it needs any changes.
0003-winsup-cygwin-path.cc-path_conv-check-Reattach-trail.patch
Description: Binary data
