On Dec 22 01:03, Ray Donnelly wrote: > I hope this is OK and I've done it in the best place. Please advise if > it needs any changes.
I have no idea if this is ok. This is a patch to a very crucial function in terms of path handling, and it's not clear that this isn't doing the wrong thing. What is this patch trying to accomplish? Do you have example user space code which is failing for this very reason? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgp9nuNdBYIH1.pgp
Description: PGP signature