Hi,
Qt Creator is not part of Cygwin?
Furthermore having a static version of the Qt library would save
everybody a lot of trouble (both Qt3 and Qt4).
-Phil
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://
On 7/11/2011 8:33 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
Hi,
Qt Creator is not part of Cygwin?
What about qmake of Qt4? This is not installed.
-Phil
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com
I am trying to build Qt4 from source and I get the following error:
Creating qmake. Please wait...
g++ -c -o project.o -pipe -DQMAKE_OPENSOURCE_EDITION -I. -Igenerators
-Igenerators/unix -Igenerators/win32 -Igenerators/mac
-I/usr/src/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.5.3/include
-I/usr/src/qt-x11-openso
On 7/11/2011 9:33 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
I am trying to build Qt4 from source and I get the following error:
make (e=2): The system cannot find the file specified.
Ok nevermind, it somehow found gmake in my path and got all confused.
-Phil
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com
On 7/12/2011 1:53 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 21:03 -0400, Phil Bouchard wrote:
What about qmake of Qt4? This is not installed.
http://cygwin.com/packages/
I don't see qmake for Qt4. Besides, qt3to4.exe and many other binaries
are not installed.
--
Pr
On 7/12/2011 2:43 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Why? A static Qt means no plugins, which is pretty worthless.
Distributing a standalone executable is much simpler than distributing
an archive full of DLLs. Plugins are needed only for drivers, fancy
fonts, etc. not for a standard application
On 7/12/2011 1:36 PM, Marco atzeri wrote:
use the search functionality
http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=qmake
see details of libQtCore4-devel
That's strange I thought I had installed all Qt4 components and
qmake-qt4.exe wasn't anywhere in the PATH. Sorry for the confusion.
On 7/12/2011 10:41 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
You don't need to distribute the Qt DLLs, just have your users get them
from the distro.
I meant some people would like to distribute an executable to systems
with no Cygwin or Qt installed.
False. While some plugins can be builtin to the li
On 7/13/2011 1:16 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
The other major distributions don't do this, and there's a reason why:
a static Qt build is different from a shared one, and you can't install
them both in the same place.
Well you just have to rename the static library.
The Qt build is very con
On 7/13/2011 10:36 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
I failed to see any "-no-example" option.
Ok it's: -nomake example
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
U
On 7/13/2011 1:16 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Needless to say, our Qt includes patches which fix all these errors. I
have yet to push these upstream, so in the meantime, please direct Qt
bug reports to these lists.
As I mentioned here:
http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-20342?focuse
On 7/13/2011 3:54 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
And I had to pass x11 to CONFIG in the project file. Now it works!
Perhaps it is pointless having a static Qt library after all because the
executable will depend on other libraries that are dynamic:
...
cygICE-6.dll => /usr/bin/cygICE-6.
On 7/13/2011 5:59 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
True. If your goal was to get down to 1 executable that contains all
that is necessary to run, then you'll never get there.
That's too bad, I'll try MinGW.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http:/
On 7/14/2011 8:51 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
That's too bad, I'll try MinGW.
I mean, I'll try MSVC.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe
14 matches
Mail list logo
