ogle.com/p/mintty/issues/detail?id=124
Are ncursesw versions of Vim and Mutt imminent? Or is it not going to
happen anytime soon?
--
Michael Ludwig
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cyg
Corinna Vinschen schrieb am 07.06.2010 um 12:40:43 (+0200):
> On Jun 7 11:23, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> > Are ncursesw versions of Vim and Mutt imminent? Or is it not going
> > to happen anytime soon?
>
> Thanks for the heads up. I'll build the next release of vim (ther
ing compiled against ncurses (*without*
wide characters) was a good match.
Now that I'm switching to the MinTTY terminal, which supports
Unicode/UTF-8, I need a Vim compiled against ncursesw (*with*
wide characters) if my assessment of the situation is correct.
--
Michael Ludwig
-
Michael Ludwig schrieb am 07.06.2010 um 14:28 (+0200):
> As for Mutt, I downloaded the sources via Cygwin setup.exe and
> recompiled against ncursesw. As I couldn't find a suitable configure
> option, I had to edit the Makefile as follows to (1) enable ncursesw
> and (2)
Michael Ludwig schrieb am 07.06.2010 um 15:09 (+0200):
> To get the same behaviour as with the Cygwin binary Mutt, some more
> tweaking of configure flags or other stuff seems required. Two
> differences I've noted so far:
>
> * An error message "repetition-operator op
Andy Koppe schrieb am 07.06.2010 um 19:17 (+0100):
> On 7 June 2010 13:44, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> > As you say, Vim works fine with UTF-8. It's just that until very
> > recently, I've been using the rxvt terminal emulator, which lacks
> > Unicode support; so Vim
t treat for those who want to, or have to, use both systems.
Thanks for that!
--
Michael Ludwig
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
the
mutt-users mailing list.
http://www.mutt.org/mail-lists.html
I had minor upgrade problems, too, and have quickly been helped there.
Can't help you, though, as I've never used IMAP.
--
Michael Ludwig
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
y, or even deconfigure or corrupt
my installation?
--
Michael Ludwig
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Andrey Repin schrieb am 27.06.2010 um 05:10 (+0400):
> Greetings, Michael Ludwig!
>
> > My Cygwin resides under C:\cygwin (plus G:\cygvar for packages),
> > but as both C: and G: are nearly full, I'd like to move the Cygwin
> > folders to partition T: which has pl
Michael Ludwig schrieb am 27.06.2010 um 11:55 (+0200):
> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Cygwin\Installations]
> "c5e39b7a9d22bafb"="\\??\\C:\\cygwin"
>
> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Cygwin\Program Options]
>
> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE
Steven Monai schrieb am 27.06.2010 um 09:55 (-0700):
> On 2010/06/27 6:37 AM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> > The root directory in setup.exe is displayed correctly. Seems to
> > depend on the registry setting. The "Local Package Directory" path,
> > however, which I cop
Christopher Faylor schrieb am 27.06.2010 um 15:01 (-0400):
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 03:37:26PM +0200, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> >I copied C:\cygwin to T: instead of reinstalling. Here's a list of
> >things I had to fix (or fixed preemptively):
> >
> >* f
Corinna Vinschen schrieb am 29.06.2010 um 10:25 (+0200):
> On Jun 28 22:57, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> Actually, while it's not necessary, it makes sense to keep the entries
> under the "installations" key intact. They are generated the first
> time a Cygwin DLL is use
ed correctly if you had left the registry alone but, since
> you didn't, there was no reason to restore the first directory.
>
> I didn't want the cygwin archives to have advice which suggested that
> regedit was necessary to move the DLL.
Got it. Thanks!
--
Michael Ludw
of the script's failure to
guess the build system that I added the --build option to configure.
But obviously I didn't fill in a correct value. What should I try?
--
Michael Ludwig
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Do
Matthias Andree schrieb am 31.08.2010 um 00:58 (+0200):
> On 30.08.2010 23:52, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> >The mutt mail reader shipping with Cygwin does not have SMTP
> >enabled, which I'd like to give a try. So I tried to build mutt,
> >but encountered problems.
>
Csaba Raduly schrieb am 31.08.2010 um 09:17 (+0200):
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> >
> > It is only after receiving an error because of the script's failure
> > to guess the build system that I added the --build option to
> > configure
ve to specify --build.
Is that `prepare' script a standard step in autoconf? Or is it a
custom feature of either Mutt or Cygwin or something else?
One of these days I'll finally get around to sort out the GNU build
suite stuff.
--
Michael Ludwig
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.
strings to pull.
--
Michael Ludwig
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
the ssh command
Sounds like you want to explore what options ~/.ssh/config has:
Host s22
HostName server-22.bla.rz
User superadmin
Then type:
ssh s22
Same mechanism available for PuTTY.
--
Michael Ludwig
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
ld have
been no other bash processes around.
This is Win32, XP Home SP3.
I hope this description is helpful in debugging this issue.
--
Michael Ludwig
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwi
Michael Ludwig schrieb am 01.10.2010 um 01:19 (+0200):
> I'm seeing a painfully noticeable slowdown on my system. I must have
> contracted this slowdown last week. My Cygwin is up to date as of now,
> October 1st, 01:00 CET
For a bit more precision, here's an excerpt
Larry Hall (Cygwin) schrieb am 03.10.2010 um 20:50 (-0400):
> On 10/1/2010 8:08 PM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> >Larry Hall (Cygwin) schrieb am 30.09.2010 um 20:38 (-0400):
> >>My WAG is you're suffering from changes in the new version of
> >>bash_completion. If
in launching?
> But on the other hand, Marco Atzeri could not confirm this on his XP
> box. I'm sure it's all about time slowing down in the vicinity of
> black holes...
A computational maelstrom, a processing quicksand.
--
Michael Ludwig
--
Problem reports: http://cygwi
Michael Ludwig schrieb am 07.10.2010 um 00:27 (+0200):
> SZABÓ Gergely schrieb am 06.10.2010 um 23:30 (+0200):
> >
> > please see this thread (test scripts included):
> > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-09/msg00871.html
>
> Thanks, Gabor - ...
Thanks *Gergely*!
vated, this I can
> confirm: $ time bash -i -c echo
>
> real0m1.731s
> user0m0.325s
> sys 0m0.699s
$ time bash -i -c echo
real0m8.025s
user0m1.404s
sys 0m0.794s
$ time bash -i -c echo
real0m7.910s
user0m1.467s
sys 0m0.779s
$ time bash -i -c e
Michael Ludwig schrieb am 07.10.2010 um 00:27 (+0200):
> SZABÓ Gergely schrieb am 06.10.2010 um 23:30 (+0200):
> >
> > please see this thread (test scripts included):
> > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-09/msg00871.html
>
> Thanks, Gabor - I saw your thread, which r
Michael Ludwig schrieb am 30.10.2010 um 15:55 (+0200):
> Michael Ludwig schrieb am 07.10.2010 um 00:27 (+0200):
> > SZABÓ Gergely schrieb am 06.10.2010 um 23:30 (+0200):
> > >
> > > please see this thread (test scripts included):
> > > http://cygwin
29 matches
Mail list logo
