On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 08:43:24PM +0100, First Name Last Name wrote:
> 6 months ago I had no problem. But now I am using new versions (cygwin
> 1.3.6-6,
> postgresql 7.1.3-1 and cygipc-1.11-1) and I have the following problems:
> pq_recvbuf: unexpected EOF on client connection
> pq_recvbuf: recv
Chris,
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 10:22:37AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
> FYI, Zope was broken under out-of-the-box Cygwin 1.3.6 because of the fork
> issue. The rebase solution allows Zope to work again.
>
> Many thanks,
You are very welcome! Thanks for taking the time to see if this solutio
Rob,
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 11:06:35AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jason Tishler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > After the above is completed, then I would entertain adding such an
> > option if the community dee
Greg,
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 03:38:10PM +0800, Greg Matheson wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > Otherwise, you can try my attached build recipe. Note the following:
>
> > 2. Building procmail under Cygwin is a little touchy. Sometimes I
> >
Greg,
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 12:13:06PM +0800, Greg Matheson wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2002, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > Did you apply the patch... IIRC, then it
> > should have solved the problem with the execv() test.
>
> It seems the patch had been applied. So, I changed li
Kevin,
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 10:11:48AM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
> > Determine why cygcurl-2.dll and possibly other DLLs do not
> > tolerate rebasing.
>
> I'm the curl maintainer.
>
> Fair warning - I'm probably not going to be much help here
> (as far as figuring out why it's not reloca
New News:
===
I have updated the version of Python in cygwin/contrib to 2.2-1.
The tarballs should be available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
Threading is still disabled and will continue to be so until all known
pthreads support issues have been resolved. Additionally, the _socket
m
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 11:47:32AM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
> Negative - I get no warnings at all during the building of
> cygcurl-2.dll.
Thanks for the confirmation.
> Here's the gcc line that actually dumps out the dll:
>
> $ gcc -Wl,--base-file,.libs/cygcurl-2.dll-base -Wl,--dll -nostar
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 02:02:01PM -0500, Norman Vine wrote:
> Jason Tishler writes:
> >Does anyone have any bright ideas?
>
> What happens if you link with --enable-auto-image-base ??
I was unable to get dllwrap to use --enable-auto-image-base, but I was
able to build pq.dll u
Rob,
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 09:42:57AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jason Tishler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I decided to table the search for the "offending" ld option(s) because
> > of the following gloomy thou
Kevin,
Please keep your replies on-list...
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:08:09AM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
> gcc 2.95.3-5
> binutils 20011002-1
So you are using the latest too.
> Attached are three DLLs in a tar/bz2 file. They are as follows:
>
> cygcurl-2-build.dll : rebuilt last Friday, fr
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 02:01:20PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 09:18:07AM -0600, CyberZombie wrote:
> > Can you elaborate how you did this?
>
> Once the Hummingbird SOCKS proxy software is installed, all that you need
> to do is create a socks.cnf f
Gerrit,
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:13:42PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> That is funny, with my browser (IE) get just binary garbage:
>
> BZh91AY&SYCF#=Uÿà
õxù¯4¦½¸ô÷ö>ûï >$什¼
>júzí )
> ...
Sorry, I have no control over your browser and this web serv
Jean-Michel,
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:12:22AM +0100, Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
> Has anyone successfully ported RPM to Cygwin?
See the following for my 4.0.2 experiences and patch:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-07/msg00949.html
Jason
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.co
Kevin,
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:22:06PM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:26 PM
>
> > Kevin,
> > Please keep your replies on-list...
>
> Normally I wou
Chuck,
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:57:50AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Request:
> Can somebody verify that they can now build packages without
> -DBROKEN_LINKER when previously that switch was required?
I can successfully rebuild Python 2.2 without -DBROKEN_LINKER --
specifically, the _curs
Jean-Michel,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 10:51:38AM +0100, Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
> Le Mercredi 9 Janvier 2002 17:08, vous avez écrit :
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:12:22AM +0100, Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
> > See the following for my 4.0.2 experiences and patch:
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/c
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 01:08:54PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 12:47:00PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >postgres: this setup hint is absolutely incomplete. It has no sdesc,
> >ldesc, category, OR requires. I made no changes -- the maintainer needs
> >to generat
Kevin,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:22:09PM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
> Don't have any idea at all why it didn't work before but now it does.
Are your sure that you weren't using an old binutils when you built the
non-rebase-able curl DLL? I just checked my setup.log and I was using
binutils 2
Kevin,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:39:17AM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
> although I'm pretty sure when I prepared those three sample
> DLLs to mail to you, I had the latest on my machine...
I know the above. What I was trying to determine is what binutils
version you had installed when you buil
New News:
===
I have updated the version of PostgreSQL in cygwin/contrib to 7.1.3-2.
The tarballs should be available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
This version is the same as 7.1.3-1 except that it includes a fix for the
"Cannot rename init file" problem as described in:
http://
Pat,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 01:08:00AM -0800, Patrick Lightbody wrote:
> So... any thoughts? I need good POP support, good filtering support, and a
> good mailer (aka: I need fetchmail, procmail, and mutt). Has anyone else
> done this?
Yes, I use this exact combination.
> I've exhausted my s
Pat,
Please keep your replies on the list.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:39:31AM -0800, Patrick Lightbody wrote:
> Jason, actually I got the procmail binary, and I compiled mutt and
> fetchmail myself. I was mostly having trouble getting procmail to work on
> port 25,
Most likely because you don
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 02:11:22PM -0500, Bradford, Denis wrote:
> I've tried without success to build the latest w3m sources (w3m-0.2.4.tar)
> on Windows 2000 (through Cygwin). I see others having the same problem, so
> thought I'd try to find the compiled binaries:
>
> [snip]
>
> Any help appr
David,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 10:10:10PM +0100, David Ecker wrote:
> I tried to install the ipc-deamon and the postmaster as a nt service. The
> installation was ok. I could start "(net start) ipc-deamon" and after that
> I could start the "(net start) postmaster" service. I also added a
> re
Justin,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 02:34:48PM +1100, Justin Clift wrote:
> Would it be possible for someone to do a re-compile of PostgreSQL 7.1.3
> for Cygwin, specifically with the debugging symbols enabled, and have it
> in some kind of form so users who have a problem with PostgreSQL on
> cygwin
Justin,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 02:04:48AM +1100, Justin Clift wrote:
> Thanks for your continued support. :)
You are very welcome.
> Lucky for us all, it turns out the problem is a non-problem. It was
> just a way in which cygipc (I might have the exact spelling wrong) not
> being installed
Stipe,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 09:21:26PM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> The Revision Control System (RCS) manages multiple revisions of files.
> RCS automates the storing, retrieval, logging, identification, and
> merging of revisions. RCS is useful for text that is revised
> frequently, e.g., prog
Stipe,
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 09:56:54AM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Jason Tishler wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 09:21:26PM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> > > The Revision Control System (RCS) manages multiple revisions of files.
> > > RCS automates the
Timothy,
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:17:07AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can anyone point me to information of automatically starting &
> stopping postgresql under NT / cygwin?
Read the README file:
/usr/doc/Cygwin/postgresql-7.1.3.README
Jason
--
Unsubscribe info: http://
Timothy,
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:15:39PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Whereas I am running 7.1.3, and the referenced directory exists, that
> file does not. There is a faq_mswin, and a readme, but neither has this
> information in it.
Are you running the PostgreSQL that is part of th
Olaf,
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Olaf Foellinger wrote:
> I'm looking for a mailcap entry to start office documents directly from
> the attachments. I've looked through the archives but didn't find
> anything.
I use the attached mailcap with mutt. It relies on the attached shell
New News:
===
I have updated the version of PostgreSQL in cygwin/contrib to 7.2-2.
The tarballs should be available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following is a summary of the changes since the previous release,
7.1.3-2:
o Upgraded to version PostgreSQL 7.2.
o DLLs are re
Command completion specs causes bash 2.05a specifically *and* Cygwin
in general to behave "poorly." By "poorly," I mean that bash becomes
unusable after attempting command completion and Cygwin cannot start
new processes:
$ ps
C:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe: *** mount table size version mismatch detecte
Heitzso,
Please keep your replies on-list...
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:59:08AM -0500, Heitzso wrote:
> I just upgraded cygwin, which I do on a regular basis,
> and picked up the new postgresql. Some glitches ...
>
> no automated version upgrade of db is provided
> not certain this
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:01:56AM -0800, Rick Rankin wrote:
> --- Jason Tishler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Note that this distribution will *not* function correctly with Cygwin
> > 1.3.9-1. If you want to use this distribution, then you *must*
Michael,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:26:55AM -0800, Michael A Chase wrote:
> Could you have a development version of cygwin1.dll somewhere in $PATH?
Nope:
$ which -a cygwin1.dll
/usr/bin/cygwin1.dll
A Windows search comes up empty too.
Like I said in my previous post, the Cygwin proble
Chuck,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 01:52:47PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Wrong. Those "warnings" are really just informational messages. The
> python library exports *variables* as well as functions. Your DLL
> probably only exports funtions. DATA exports are very very tricky;
> there is a
Gerald,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 03:52:28PM -0500, Gerald S. Williams wrote:
> Presumably, the distutils package sets this automatically, ...
Yes it does.
Jason
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:
Gene,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 04:22:11PM -0800, Gene C. Ruzicka wrote:
> But the online User's Guide
> for Cygwin says that the lp, lpr commands don't
> work in Cygwin, and that the MS print command
> should be used to print from a cygwin command
> line.
See attached for my latest PostScript
Wayne,
Please post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of sending private email.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:41:03PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Did you ever arrive at an answer as to how to address the missing
> cygreadline.dll?
Why are you asking me?
> It cropped up when I was working/playing
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 09:05:01AM -0500, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 05:06:36PM -0800, AJ Reins wrote:
> > Possible patch for bash to fix the problem noticed by Jason Tishler in msg:
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-02/msg00581.html
> >
>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 09:57:21PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
> Satish Balay wrote:
> > Ok so the problem is likely to go away for python users.
>
> I don't know if Jason has started compiling Python with
> --enable-auto-image-base or not.
I have been using --enable-auto-image-base since the ver
Satish,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:15:01PM -0500, Satish Balay wrote:
> I've tried using python after doing a complete 'reinstall' and so far
> It works fine. I'll keep track of any future breakages.
>
> It will be great if rebase is not required at all...
The following is a good test:
$ py
Satish,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:04:52PM -0500, Satish Balay wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:15:01PM -0500, Satish Balay wrote:
> > > I've tried using python after doing a complete 'reinstall' and so
> >
John,
See the following:
http://cygwin.com/acronyms#PPIOSPE
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 01:09:52PM -0500, John Ehresman wrote:
> Is it possible to install cygwin python 2.4 while retaining cygwin
> python 2.2 & 2.3? I realize that only one will be available as
> 'python', but things are set up
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 03:53:36PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> If that's the case, then (a) it's okay for Jason to package postgres
> the way he does,
It is up to Reini Urban, he is the PostgreSQL maintainer as of 8.x.
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key serv
Yao,
See the following:
http://cygwin.com/acronyms#PPIOSPE
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 12:48:20PM +0800, Yao G. Zhan wrote:
> I read the mailing list at cygwin.com and found that you made vsftpd
> working on cygwin.
>
> However, when I tried to compile vsftpd source 2.0.3 downloaded from
> ftp:
New News:
===
I have updated the version of fetchmail to 6.3.1-1. The tarballs should
be available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The only change between this version and the previous one is the
following:
o update to version 6.3.1
Old News:
===
Fetchmail is a remote mail re
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 08:06:13PM -0600, reader at newsguy dot com wrote:
> In that response it was suggested to use a line like:
>mda "/usr/bin/*procmail* -f %F -d %T"
>
> To pass mail to procmail.
>
> [snip]
>
> Cutting to the chase: Using the `mda' line posted above I get a
> syntax e
Pavel,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 05:59:57PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > New News:
> > ===
> > I have updated the version of fetchmail to 6.3.1-1. The tarballs
> > should be available on a Cygwin mirror near you short
Pavel,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:22:13PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > > I've updated fetchmail today and I no longer get visual feedback
> > > about its progress when messages are being retrieved. Instead
> >
Pavel,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:16:26PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > Sorry, but I'm not sure why the output went to the console with your
> > previous installation.
>
> Well, in a sense it does but it is not as it used to
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 11:18:40AM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> Jason, are you following this?
Not very closely. Sorry, but cycles are very scarce right now.
However, I did note the following from Mark:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 01:39:30AM -0800, Mark Geisert wrote:
> The code at /src/
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:12:02PM -0600, Dill, Jens (END-CHI) wrote:
> It seems that there is indeed more to it. I did make the "obvious"
> change and reran rebaseall. The message I got from the first Oracle
> DLL it encountered was:
>
> ReBaseImage (/cygdrive/d/oracle/app/oracle/product/9.2.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 01:00:53PM -0800, Tyler Durden wrote:
> When I run the daemon (net start "cygwin proftpd" in
> Windows), I get this error in /var/log/proftpd.log
>
> myservername - PRIVS_RELINQUISH: unable to
> seteuid(session.uid): Invalid argument
> myservername - PRIVS_RELINQUISH: unabl
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 02:36:19PM -0600, Dill, Jens wrote:
> I did make the changes to rebase suggested by Mark Geisert, and I will
> be forwarding my updated source file to Jason Tishler for him to take
> a look at.
Please send them in the form of a patch against the latest source
Tim,
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 03:53:42PM -, Tim Bedding wrote:
> Has anyone written a simple README describing how to get started after
> installing the Cygwin base and then the proftpd package, assuming
> minimal knowledge of Cygwin?
See the following:
/usr/share/doc/Cygwin/proftpd-1.2.1
Ken,
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 03:40:58AM -0500, zhou gang wrote:
> i installed proftpd 1.2.10 on cygwin. But it seems some features can't
> work as expected.
>
> i add a user named cathy in Users group. And i have a ken in
> Administrators group. i want to lock cathy in her home directory, and
>
Christian,
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 08:39:26PM +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
> >Python's time.altzone is equal to time.timezone, it should be
> >time.timezone-3600 (for CEST)
> >
> >$ python -c 'import time; time.tzset(); print time.ctime(), \
> > time.daylight, time.timezone, time.altzone, time.
New News:
===
I have updated the version of Python to 2.4.3-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following are the notable changes since the previous release:
o upgrade to Python 2.4.3
o apply SourceForge patch #1490224 to fix the time.altzone
Christian,
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:56:08PM +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
> Jason Tishler wrote:
> > Sorry, but I'm timezone challenged. So, I recommend submitting your
> > patch to http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=5470&atid=305470 for
> > co
Yaakov,
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 09:26:25PM -0500, Yaakov S wrote:
> Could we have an update to python soon?
Done.
Thanks for the nudge. :,)
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6
--
Unsubscr
Christian,
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 09:44:45PM +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
> Thanks for this quick release!
You are quite welcome.
Thanks,
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6
--
Unsubscr
Yaakov,
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 04:54:37PM -0500, Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
> Jason Tishler wrote:
> > Thanks for the nudge. :,)
>
> And thank you for the quick version bump!
You are quite welcome.
> BTW, for your next release, would you mind making a
> /usr/l
Yaakov,
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 03:14:38PM -0500, Yaakov S wrote:
> Jason Tishler wrote:
> > AFAICT, Cygwin Python uses the normal Python layout.
> >
> > On Cygwin, we have:
> >
> > $ ls /usr/lib/python2.4/config
> > Makefile Setup.config con
New News:
===
I have updated the version of rebase to 2.4.3-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The only notable change (to rebaseall) since the previous release is:
* Changes to support Cygwin's CYGWIN=transparent_exe option.
Old News:
===
The
Mark,
See the following:
http://cygwin.com/acronyms#PPIOSPE
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 03:44:16AM -0700, Mark Charney wrote:
> In rebase 2.4.3 you have a URL in the file:
>
> /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/rebase-2.4.3.README
>
> That points to here:
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/too
Neal,
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 10:21:26PM -0700, Neal Norwitz wrote:
> We were originally running with 1.5.19. We supposedly upgraded to
> 1.5.20-1, however from one of the error msgs, it looks like we're
> still be running the old version.
Yes, see below...
> I didn't see anything in the CHANGEL
David,
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 11:19:37AM -0500, David E. Bath wrote:
> I recently updated fetchmail 6.3.1-1 from 6.2.5-2. I now get an error
> when it connects to one of my mail servers. Using "fetchamil -v" I
> noticed a difference in the output that indicates the likely problem.
>
> 6.3.1-1 gi
David,
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 10:47:14AM -0500, David E. Bath wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 09:02:36PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 11:19:37AM -0500, David E. Bath wrote:
> > > I recently updated fetchmail 6.3.1-1 from 6.2.5-2. I now get an
&
Maarten,
Please post instead of sending private email.
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 01:10:53PM +0400, Maarten Boekhold wrote:
> I wanted to run this by you before I hose my system with a potentially
> unnecessary rebaseall...
>
> I'm porting XFCE to cygwin/X, most of it is running perfectly now. One
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 02:41:55PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
> That DLL is in use. It cannot be written while it's in use. You must
> have a cygwin program still running that uses that DLL. You must stop
> ALL Cygwin programs and services, and you cannot run the command from
> rxvt or anything
Daniel,
Please post instead of sending private email.
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 12:44:58PM +, DANIBULDANIBUL wrote:
> Hello,
> I have tried to start idlelib from cygwin but I got the following.
> I have tried to solve it with the rebase procedure but it is still not
> working. this is what I g
on 2.3.4
> Thanks for your help,
You are welcome.
> * From: Jason Tishler
> * To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
> * Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 08:49:26 -0400
> * Subject: Re: 1.3.22+, Python, NTVDM illegal instructio
Michael,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 06:19:33PM +0100, Michael Peppler wrote:
> I'm trying to build sqsh under Cygwin and I'm running into a problem
> with decorate vs. non-decorated library symbols.
>
> Sybase uses the __stdcall calling convention for its libraries under
> Windows, so gcc generates
Steve,
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 01:20:08PM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Just had the problem and though I would post so that others know the
> workaround / fix if they have it as well.
> [snip]
> Hope this helps people
I recommend using rebaseall's -T option instead:
http://www.cygwin.com/
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 08:28:30PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> Larry Hall wrote:
> > Ah, so this is the classic rebase problem. ...
> > [install] the 'rebase' package ... run 'rebaseall'...
>
> That fixed it! Thank you very much. :-)
This is the first time I've heard that sshd requires re
[AFAICT, this announcement was not automatically forwarded from
cygwin-announce@ to cygwin@, so I'm manually posting a copy myself.]
New News:
===
I have updated the version of Python to 2.4-1. The tarballs should be
available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
The following is the only n
Reini,
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 04:02:47PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
> Jason Tishler schrieb:
> >I have updated the version of Python to 2.4-1. The tarballs should
> >be available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
> >
> >The following is the only notable change
Peter,
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 11:18:12AM +0100, Peter Astrand wrote:
> However, since my example code
> (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-12/msg00305.html) still fails,
> something is still wrong. Is it possible the the "fix" above actually
> caused this problem?
AFAICT, the problems indicate by
Jeff,
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 02:55:12PM -0500, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> Regardless, the behavior is wrong. The same test on a buffered file
> yields the EOF.
>
> I have posted a patch.
Thanks for the patch. I have confirmed it resolves the following Cygwin
Python problem:
http://sf.net/tra
John,
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 05:45:31PM -0600, John A Meinel wrote:
> I'm working on a project that is using python with threads and
> readline. As near as I can figure out, the default cygwin python has
> threads disabled. I've tried to do some searching about why, but the
> best I can find is
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:43:36PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > well, do i have to rebase all DLLs on my installation, or only that
> > one mentioned by the error message? won't destroy my installation
> > if doing the wrong thing;-)
>
> I'd try to rebase only your own dll first.
IMO, reba
Henry,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:22:48PM +, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> > Suggestions? I tried using Jason Tishler's rebase on xemacs.exe,
> > but it refused. . .
>
> Ah, but rebasing cygwin1.dll _did_ fix the problem (once I had tracked
> down cygserver and cygrunsrv in the Process Manager
Henry,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:10:26PM +, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> Jason Tishler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sigh. More fodder for the spammers... :,(
> > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:22:48PM +, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> >> Ah, but rebasing cygwin1.dll _did_
Henry,
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:02:20PM +, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> Jason Tishler writes:
> > If you get any errors due to DLLs being in-use or read-only,
> > then take the appropriate action and rerun rebaseall.
> > Otherwise, you run the risk of fork() f
Henry,
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 03:28:11PM +, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> Now I had rebased those two by hand (because for reasons I can't now
> figure out rebaseall didn't do them -- pbly because I installed GTK
> 'by hand' as it were, not via the package mechanism),
Bingo! Use rebaseall's "-
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 08:56:58AM +0100, Rainer Hochreiter wrote:
> but what's the real reason why popen() results in the address conflict
> and system() does not?!
AFAICT, popen() calls fork() and system() does not.
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 02:21:22PM +0100, Rainer Hochreiter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 08:56:58AM +0100, Rainer Hochreiter wrote:
> >> but what's the real reason why popen() results in the address
> >> conflict and system() does not?!
> >
> > AFAICT, popen() calls fork() and system() does n
Peter,
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:29:25AM +0100, Peter Valdemar M?rch wrote:
> * What does rebase do?
As its name implies, rebase rebases (i.e., changes) the base address of
DLLs. See the following for more details:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/tools/too
ingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6
/*
* Copyright (c) 2005 Jason Tishler
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
Igor,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 03:19:35PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 07:15:09PM -0500, Jaye Speaks wrote:
> > > does anyone know of a shell program to retrieve the property info
> > > from windo
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 03:32:24AM +0100, le chapelain germain wrote:
> germ (localhost[127.0.0.1]) - no such user 'ftp'
Note the above.
> [snip]
>
> What is the problem ?
Did you forget to update your /etc/passwd with mkpasswd? What does the
following indicate?
$ fgrep ftp /etc/passwd
Dean,
Please post instead of sending private email.
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 12:42:22PM -0800, Dean N. Williams wrote:
> I'm trying to build one of my executables in Cygwin. I was wondering
> if you've seen this type of error? Everything appears to compile, but
> the linking fails.
>
> ippc% make
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 03:33:37PM -0500, Chris Herborth wrote:
> Nick Burch wrote:
> >With cygwin distributed python (2.4, dec 4 2004), there's a bug in
> >tempfile.
> >
> >[snip]
>
> This isn't a Cygwin problem or feature. The Windows-native Python 2.4
> (Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19)
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 12:09:21PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:17:03AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> >Nick Coghlan wrote:
> >Command lines looked like (with thread and file counts filled in): $
> >python /lib/python2.4/test/test_threadedtempfile.py -t -f
> >
> >
>
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 03:09:08AM -0800, shih lin wrote:
> I had proftpd 1.2.10, pretty current, but it can not run at all
>
> --
> $ /usr/sbin/proftpd.exe
> outlawinn - unable to set uid to 18, current uid: 1007
> --
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 08:26:43PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 04:40:18PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 03:09:08AM -0800, shih lin wrote:
> >> I had proftpd 1.2.10, pretty current, but it
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:40:13PM -0500, Kirschner, Paul E wrote:
> What happened here? Any help in making this work?
See the following:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=unable+remap+same+address+parent+cygwin+python
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or ke
601 - 700 of 981 matches
Mail list logo
