which we
don't have the source. Do you know if that Cygwin version is archived
anywhere?
Thanks.
Henry da Costa
Director, Software Development
Immersion Corporation
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Doc
Max Bowsher wrote:
> You have sent this message to a public mailing list.
Thanks for replying. I didn't realize that the "Christopher Faylor" link
at http://www.cygwin.com/ led to the cygwin mailing list. I should have
been more vigilant.
> The phrase "complete Cygwin version 1.3.20 set of packag
Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> I will add this though: If you have a program that worked on 1.3.20*
which does
> not work on 1.3.22* it's more productive to try and find out the cause
of the
> problem rather than going back in time. If it turns out to be a
problem in the
> Cygwin DLL, matbe the royal we
Larry Hall wrote:
> Why do you only have the executable? Also, why can't the provider of
> this executable give you with the support you need? Strictly
> speaking, if the provider hasn't purchased a commercial license from
> Red Hat, they are legally bound by the GPL. If they aren't providing
>
4 matches
Mail list logo