Larry Hall wrote: > Why do you only have the executable? Also, why can't the provider of > this executable give you with the support you need? Strictly > speaking, if the provider hasn't purchased a commercial license from > Red Hat, they are legally bound by the GPL. If they aren't providing > source for all parts of the Cygwin distribution they're using, as well as > source for their executable, they are in violation of the GPL. If this is > the case, this list would like to know about this violation so it can be > resolved. Can you enlighten us on this aspect?
I'm trying to get what I need from the provider of that executable. The executable only calls Cygwin executables, much like a perl or shell script. It doesn't incorporate any Cygwin or Gnu code. Thanks for your help. Henry -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
