I've been a happy cygwin user for at least a decade, but starting this week I
can't seem to update any more, and in fact my installation is broken entirely.
When I run (a freshly downloaded) setup-x86.exe, at some point during install
the installer quits, the .exe-file is removed, and sometimes m
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:46:57AM +0200, Arend Rensink wrote:
> I've been a happy cygwin user for at least a decade, but starting this week I
> can't seem to update any more, and in fact my installation is broken entirely.
>
> When I run (a freshly downloaded) setup-x86.exe, at some point during
Hi,
I am running into the same issue.
My path is stripped down as far as possible:
$ echo $PATH
/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin
But still no cigar.
$ gdb
/local/night/fizz_build_Win7_with_icons/libraries/compilelib/unittest/exec/cygwin64/MINGW/normal_mt_so/unittest.exe
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.8
Copyright (C) 201
On 25-9-2014 12:18, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
I would be looking very hard at whatever virus protection you have.
The fact that the setup-*.exe is being removed makes me think some
third party program is killing the installer and deleting the
executable; that's just not something the installer will
Greetings, Arend Rensink!
>> I would be looking very hard at whatever virus protection you have.
>> The fact that the setup-*.exe is being removed makes me think some
>> third party program is killing the installer and deleting the
>> executable; that's just not something the installer will do.
>
Arend Rensink wrote:
On 25-9-2014 12:18, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
I would be looking very hard at whatever virus protection you have.
The fact that the setup-*.exe is being removed makes me think some
third party program is killing the installer and deleting the
executable; that's just not somethi
You might try renaming setup-x86.exe to something less scary like
cygwin-myfriend.exe, and using --no-admin option if not already.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cy
On 25/09/2014 14:18, Arend Rensink wrote:
On 25-9-2014 12:18, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
Unfortunately, the virus software configuration is set by university
policy, I can't touch it myself :-( (though I am of course also trying
to go that route).
you can also open a false positive reports with t
On 25-9-2014 15:13, Andrey Repin wrote:
Kaspersky "Antivirus" is notoriously known for protecting the users from
their computers. Also, ".Generic" is a sign that the detection was based on
heuristics.
Good guess, it's Kaspersky.
On 25-9-2014 16:10, Bob wrote:
You might try renaming setup-x8
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 26 21:03, Christian Franke wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Sounds like a nice idea. We should try that. I'm just not sure how
much time I have left to work on this before my vaca next month. Do you
have fun to look into that? We have waited so long for postfix,
Greetings, Arend Rensink!
>> Kaspersky "Antivirus" is notoriously known for protecting the users from
>> their computers. Also, ".Generic" is a sign that the detection was based on
>> heuristics.
> Good guess, it's Kaspersky.
Was not a guess at all. The designation clearly pointed to KAV.
> On
Arend Rensink writes:
>> 25-9-2014 10:54:05 Quarantined legal software that can be used by
>> criminals to damage your computer or personal data
>> PDM.Worm.P2P.generic C:\CYGWIN\SETUP-X86.EXE
>
> (I don't suppose there is a worm, but you might be interested in knowing
> about this false posi
Christian Franke writes:
> According to VirusTotal, some "Bkav" scanner reports a false positive
> for both current setup.exe versions:
> https://www.virustotal.com/file/ea2a2322ccce15af2b68b36f0543f263529422baf41480d4f96b320a55289d71/analysis/1411478277/
> https://www.virustotal.com/file/7eb582a3b
tl;dr version: can cygcheck possibly be improved (I know, PTC :) ) to show that
a package is obsolete, instead of just showing the “current” version?
Longer explanation of where the request came from:
I’ve had an alias for c=clearw.exe for quite some time. I did an update today
to get the bash
Greetings.
Trying to run the 32 bit version of setup (2.850, or 2.774) does not
populate the list of mirror sites. I am behind a firewall and have a
proxy, but have not had problems previously. I should note that it has
been some time since I updated my installations, but I'm not sure if
th
Greetings, Richard Gribble!
> Trying to run the 32 bit version of setup (2.850, or 2.774) does not
> populate the list of mirror sites. I am behind a firewall and have a
> proxy, but have not had problems previously. I should note that it has
> been some time since I updated my installations,
Am 2014-09-23 um 16:11 schrieb Marco Atzeri:
On 22/09/2014 23:14, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2014-09-17 um 12:16 schrieb Marco Atzeri:
On 17/09/2014 10:56, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2014-09-16 um 19:59 schrieb Csaba Raduly:
Hi Michael,
Unfortunately, it is not:
...
(cd /home/mosipov/asciidoc
Eliot Moss cs.umass.edu> writes:
>On 9/24/2014 6:19 PM, Paul.Domaskis wrote:
>>Andrey Repin yandex.ru> writes:
>>>Paul.Domaskis wrote:
>> Can anyone suggest how the bash-completion man page is acccessed, and
>> what M-/ means?
>
> M is for "meta", as in the meta escape key functionality in Emacs.
I've reported the bug to binutils. Thank you for your advice, all.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Daniel R. Grayson
wrote:
> Thanks! I have just checked, but mpir is compiled without -flto. Indeed,
> their
> configure script appends -fno-lto to the command line if the user try to use
> it.
On 9/25/2014 4:36 PM, Paul.Domaskis wrote:
Eliot Moss cs.umass.edu> writes:
On 9/24/2014 6:19 PM, Paul.Domaskis wrote:
Andrey Repin yandex.ru> writes:
Paul.Domaskis wrote:
Can anyone suggest how the bash-completion man page is acccessed, and
what M-/ means?
From googling, the meta key is
20 matches
Mail list logo
