Just noticed the following missing links (and they are quite recent, presumably
following some update or other).
The last one listed seems particularly weird (redundant?).
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib/crt1.o ->
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/crt1.o
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib/dl
Hi Christopher,
Thanks for your reply.
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 08:08:07PM +0400, Andrey Repin wrote:
> >Greetings, D. Boland!
> >> Cygwin security will be done for in the long run. Why not make the leap and
> >> show MS admins/developers how it should be done?
> >
>
Hello,
I am preparing the new version 4.0.1 of Varnish.
I am using a Windows 8.1 machine, with all hotfix installed.
I have updated cygwin to 1.7.31-2 and launch Varnish package tests and
some failed at "write" function.
After some investigations downloading snapshots, I have verified that:
2014-07-22 15:20 GMT+02:00 Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 22 13:59, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>> On 22/07/2014 09:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >On Jul 17 20:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >>On Jul 17 16:31, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>> >>>On 17/07/2014 08:37, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> It's the libgcc DLL
Greetings, D. Boland!
> What I meant was that MS dicided to take away impersonation privileges from
> the
> SYSTEM user, without educating admins/developers about the new model or
> alternatives
> for SYSTEM.
There's no "model", there's "rights" or "capabilities", or "privileges".
> I searched
On Jul 24 14:22, jdzstz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am preparing the new version 4.0.1 of Varnish.
> I am using a Windows 8.1 machine, with all hotfix installed.
>
> I have updated cygwin to 1.7.31-2 and launch Varnish package tests and some
> failed at "write" function.
>
> After some investigations
On Jul 24 15:08, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2014-07-22 15:20 GMT+02:00 Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jul 22 13:59, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> >> On 22/07/2014 09:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> >On Jul 17 20:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> >>On Jul 17 16:31, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> >> >>>On 17/07/2014 08:37, Corin
On Jul 24 08:52, D. Boland wrote:
> In your previous mail, you propose the following function to check for 'root'
> privileges, which an upstream maintainer could put in his code:
>
> int
> is_admin (uid_t uid)
> {
> #ifdef __CYGWIN__
> return [getgrouplist(uid, ...) contains group 544];
> #else
On Jul 23 21:23, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >The default for native Windows applications is the small code model
> >[...]
> >Therefore my
> >collegue Kai Tietz provided GCC with implementations of a medium and
> >large code model
>
> Gulp! Seems to re-read the Borland C++/T
On Jul 24 09:22, Fergus Daly wrote:
> Just noticed the following missing links (and they are quite recent,
> presumably following some update or other).
> The last one listed seems particularly weird (redundant?).
> /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib/crt1.o ->
> /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/li
When opening a .txt file in Emacs, I have flyspell-mode enabled by
default. This requires Emacs to start an aspell process. This has
been failing regularly with the following error:
0 [sig] emacs 1160 get_proc_lock: Couldn't acquire
sync_proc_subproc for(5,1), last 6, Win32 error 0
580
Hi Corinna,
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > But this only introduces a new function which she has to put into multiple
> > locations
> > of the original code. So again, why not just modify the 'getuid' function in
> > cygwin1.dll to return '0' if the current user is actually SYSTEM or one of
> > the
On 7/24/2014 4:56 PM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
When opening a .txt file in Emacs, I have flyspell-mode enabled by
default. This requires Emacs to start an aspell process. This has
been failing regularly with the following error:
0 [sig] emacs 1160 get_proc_lock: Couldn't acquire
sync_pro
On 7/24/2014 21:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> JonY, any chance we could get a gcc package with the new crtbegin.o
> soon?
Yes, I just uploaded gcc-4.8.3-2, I'll announce once it hits the mirrors.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 7/24/2014 5:42 PM, D. Boland wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> But be careful. Just because there are multiple users with admin
>> permissions, that doesn't mean they all want their mail in the same
>> mailbox for user 0...
Things are actually worse than Corinna and others h
15 matches
Mail list logo