gdb discrepancy in c++ iterators

Hello, I'm having the following problem only on cygwin, not on solaris 8. I have a sanity-check program: #include #include using namespace std; int main(void) { vector vi(3); vector::iterator it_vi = vi.begin(); cout << "Hello world."; } I c

Building cross compiler Linux host -> Cygwin target

I'm trying to build a cross compiler to i686-cygwin. Host is a i686 Debian 3.0 Linux with gcc 2.95.4 and glibc 2.2.5. (Debian packages are available for mingw32 and cygwin, however the need to access the hardware the Posix way on the target rules out mingw and packages for cygwin appear to be un

RE: Mozilla 1.3 built on cygwin?

> On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 12:04:01AM -, Chris January wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 11:58:50PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: > >>>I can't prove a fact, that forking is the most anonying problem and > >>>there were some initial work from some people (I remember Chris Faylor, > >>>Chris Janua

RE: RPM-4.1 port to cygwin available

> Peter Ring wrote: > > There's substantial evidence that RPM based distribution of Cygwin is > > feasible: > > > > http://www.holonlinux.com/product/xonwin/index.html > > > > Just in case you don't read Japanese, go directly to the FTP site: > > > > ftp://xow.holonlinux.com/pub/XonWindows/ > >

Re: RPM-4.1 port to cygwin available

On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 21:04, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Charles Wilson wrote: > > Robert Collins wrote: > >> I find this concern mystifiying though, we've had an rpm port from > >> Chuck for what - 3 ? 4 ? years. > > And mine wasn't the first. > I aired my concern not at

Re: Mozilla 1.3 built on cygwin?

On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 11:18:37AM -, Chris January wrote: > > >>You misremember. I did hobble together a copy-on-write implementation > > >>and found that it was actually slower. The generic win32 > > >>implementation of copy-on-write isn't powerful enough to completely > > >>implement fork

Re: Problems with who and w output

On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 12:16:54PM +0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > Hi > > I was wondering why I couldn't get any output from the commands who and w, > Also wall and talk are not working for me. I fixed a problem in login(1) as well as in Cygwin. Thanks for the report, Corinna -- Corinna Vinsch

Re: cygwin licensing [was: [re: tar and gzip]]

On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 11:18:17AM -0500, Greg Freemyer wrote: > Good write-up. > > Is any portion of cygwin covered by the LGPL instead of the GPL? No. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[E

Re: Please help. gcc 3.2.2 configure problem or what?

Hi - Original Message - From: "Raoul Gough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:58 PM Subject: Re: Please help. gcc 3.2.2 configure problem or what? > "Joakim Olsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi > > > > I've

Re: Please help. gcc 3.2.2 configure problem or what?

Hi - Original Message - From: "Raoul Gough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:58 PM Subject: Re: Please help. gcc 3.2.2 configure problem or what? > "Joakim Olsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi > > > > I've

Re: Mozilla 1.3 built on cygwin?

On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 02:04:37PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Win32, the original state of the memory is treated as genuin state for >each process. Therefore child processes don't inherit the changes from >their parent processes but instead they begin with a fresh unchanged memory >as it w

Re: gdb discrepancy in c++ iterators

On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Fred Ma wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having the following problem only on cygwin, > not on solaris 8. I have a sanity-check program: > > #include > #include > using namespace std; > int main(void) > { > vector vi(3); > vector::iterator it_v

Re: Building cross compiler Linux host -> Cygwin target

> # TROUBLE BEGINS HERE! > make all Shouldn't that be "make cross"? When I built my cross system, that's what I used, and I built all tools in one tree. Not that I know much about it... See messages posted here just within past couple of days on building cross chain. //lat -- If you keep an o

Re: Mozilla 1.3 built on cygwin?

On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 11:13:36AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 02:04:37PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>On Win32, the original state of the memory is treated as genuin state for >>each process. Therefore child processes don't inherit the changes from >>their parent

Re: Corrected: setup.exe beta (testing needed - really!)

Robert Collins wrote: Regarding XFree auto-installation... Cygwin Package Information ... libPropList 0.10.1-3 This requires XFree86-base. So setup is doing the right thing. Rob Well, unistalling that makes this setup work the same as the old setup. So, does this setup do dependancy

Re: gdb discrepancy in c++ iterators

Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Fred Ma wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I'm having the following problem only on cygwin, > > not on solaris 8. I have a sanity-check program: > > > > #include > > #include > > using namespace std; > > int main(void) > > { > >

Re: gdb 2003-03-03-cvs gets always a segmentation fault

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hello all, > > I installed the latest cygwin release and then I now start the debugger > I am getting always a segmentation fault. Any hints? FYI. I did a reinstall for all packages that are labeled with 'keep' in the installation tool and now all works fine. Harald

Re: gdb discrepancy in c++ iterators

On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Fred Ma wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > > On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Fred Ma wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm having the following problem only on cygwin, > > > not on solaris 8. I have a sanity-check program: > > > > > > #include > > > #include > > > us

Re: [h-e-w] Re: Possible bug in Emacs 21.3

Hello David, I tried your patch below with emacs-21.3 and emacs cvs head and it works very fine with gcc 3.2 and the latest cygwin release. So hopefully the patch is soon included into cvs. Thanks for your fast reply. Harald David Ponce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >

Re: gdb discrepancy in c++ iterators

Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > Depending on the optimization level you used to compile the program (and > on the flags in the gcc specs file, and the gcc compilation options, which > are surely different on the two systems), it's quite possible gdb got > confused about where in the program you were wi

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: login-1.8-1

I have updated the version of login(1) to 1.8-1. This version solves a permission problem accessing a non world-writable utmp file and sets the ut_id to a meaningful value. Please read the README file /usr/doc/Cygwin/login.README. To update your installation, click on the "Install Cygwin now" l

Re: Building cross compiler Linux host -> Cygwin target

/ Massimiliano Mirra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I'm trying to build a cross compiler to i686-cygwin. Host is a i686 | Debian 3.0 Linux with gcc 2.95.4 and glibc 2.2.5. Saw recently (yesterday?) one person posting what he did.. you should be able to find the article in the archive.. ahh subject

Re: Corrected: setup.exe beta (testing needed - really!)

On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 03:36, Rolf Campbell wrote: > Well, unistalling that makes this setup work the same as the old setup. > So, does this setup do dependancy analysis different than the old one? > I would guess that this new one tries to install anything that is > depended on and not already

RE: Mozilla 1.3 built on cygwin?

> I don't have the code anymore It's a pity, because everbody else has to start from scratch and couldn't take a deeper look and perhaps find the problem. Cheers Ralf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Document

Re: Corrected: setup.exe beta (testing needed - really!)

Robert Collins wrote: > On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 22:10, Vince Hoffman wrote: >>> Ok, well this is 'not good' :}. >>> >>> At what point does it crash? >>> >> >> At start before any window appears. >> Shuttting down cygwin services made no difference. >> let me know if there is any more i can do to help

pics

http://213.171.60.71/freeforever/trade.html my pics http://213.171.60.71/freeforever/trade.html remove http://213.171.60.71/remove.php -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: tin-1.4.7-1

I've updated the tin package to release 1.4.7-1. This is the latest stable tin release 1.4.7 with just a minor tweak to Makefile.in to allow error free installing of the man page. To update your installation, click on the "Install Cygwin now" link on the http://cygwin.com/ web page. This downlo

RE: Added setup.exe to User's Guide

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Andrew M. Inggs --8<-- > > 3. *Move* the ENTIRE cache directory onto a CDR (or whatever) - do NOT > > change anything within the cache. > > Specifically for CD-R, I have had trouble doing this because the > URL-encoded directories th

Allowing EASY install of thirtd party software (RE: Two GPL clarifications)

If I have "analyzed" things correctly lately; most of the GPL violations are done in this situation: 1) Person "P" writes/ports some nice software using cygwin. 2) P picks out required parts of cygwin runtime objects and builds a package that is fast and easy to install. 3) P puts the pac

RE: Determining the location of a Cygwin installation

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Rolf Campbell > > Software packages belong in C:\Program\* and nowhere else > (Note that this > > is equal to "C:\Program Files\*" on ENGLISH Win98. > > Ahhh... yeah. So, what is the rest of the disk for? Why not just put > everyt

Re: Mozilla 1.3 built on cygwin?

On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 09:33:23PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: >>I don't have the code anymore > >It's a pity, because everbody else has to start from scratch and >couldn't take a deeper look and perhaps find the problem. And the reason you wanted thousands of people to know this is...? If you ha

Re: Allowing EASY install of thirtd party software (RE: Two GPLclarifications)

On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 08:15, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote: > If I have "analyzed" things correctly lately; > most of the GPL violations are done in this situation: > > 1) Person "P" writes/ports some nice software using cygwin. > 2) P picks out required parts of cygwin runtime obj

Re: bash bug report? Minor border case:

Linda, According to , this is off-topic for the list. Please remove from further replies. Igor On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, linda w (cyg) wrote: > Valid filename created by app: > \Documents and Settings\law\My > Documents\win\registry2\regtweaks\

bash bug report? Minor border case:

Valid filename created by app: \Documents and Settings\law\My Documents\win\registry2\regtweaks\Kellys_XP_Tweaks\download.com.com\clear\redx\c.gif-ts=-104976066&edId=3&prtnr=CNET+Networks,+Inc.& oid=3000-2094-10126096&ptId=3000&onId=2094&sId=4&asId=10126096&pId=10126096&asType=Product exactly 255

compile error in types.h?

I am getting this compilation error in types.h: - c++ -O2 -g -O0 -march=i586 -Wall -Wunused -c -o RevPlayer.o RevPlayer.cpp In file included from /usr/include/cygwin/in.h:21, from /usr/include/netinet/in.h:14, from aeTCPServer.h:4,

Re: Building cross compiler Linux host -> Cygwin target

Andrew Markebo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Saw recently (yesterday?) one person posting what he did.. you should > be able to find the article in the archive.. ahh subject "Please > help. gcc 3.2.2 configure problem or what?" Yes, saw it, but it deals with CVS version. I started to check it ou