On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 09:33:23PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: >>I don't have the code anymore > >It's a pity, because everbody else has to start from scratch and >couldn't take a deeper look and perhaps find the problem.
And the reason you wanted thousands of people to know this is...? If you have such great insight into this type of thing, it won't take you any time at all to duplicate. You've been complaining about this and other cygwin performance issues for months. Why don't *you* do something? I figured fork/exec/signals out from scratch. Certainly the brighter bulbs than I who would be finding the problem would have no problems generating a new and better implementation. It's a wonder why no one has done so yet. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
