less 378 still not anchoring to \

Hello, I just reinstalled "less" from the cygwin site. It still doesn't seem to anchor to word boundaries using regex(3) rules i.e. \ doesn't match anything, as does . I read a posting suggesing a solution by using perl syntax (apparently): /\bSomeWord\b That works, but is there a known rea

Re: less 378 still not anchoring to \

f wrote: > I just reinstalled "less" from the cygwin site. > It still doesn't seem to anchor to word boundaries > using regex(3) rules i.e. \ doesn't > match anything, as does . I read > a posting suggesing a solution by using perl > syntax (apparently): > > /\bSomeWord\b > > That works, bu

Re: less 378 still not anchoring to \

Max Bowsher wrote: > f wrote: > > I just reinstalled "less" from the cygwin site. > > It still doesn't seem to anchor to word boundaries > > using regex(3) rules i.e. \ doesn't > > match anything, as does . I read > > a posting suggesing a solution by using perl > > syntax (apparently): > > > >

Re: Apache corrupt big file

Tetsu KOUNO wrote: > > (6) ServerType >ServerType inetd ... successful!! >Maybe, same reason to ftp download was successful. > > Any idea? the inetd variant, means that on every incoming TCP connect on port 80 (or whatever you have confiured), inetd will spawn an httpd prozess for that

Re: Apache corrupt big file

> The problem within the current Apache+Cygwin (normal setup) is within > the accept() serialization, which means the mechanism that the core > parent httpd prozess deals with incoming TCP connect and spreads the > load across the idle child httpd within the scoreboard file. Stipe, have you teste

Re: Apache corrupt big file

Elfyn McBratney wrote: > > > The problem within the current Apache+Cygwin (normal setup) is within > > the accept() serialization, which means the mechanism that the core > > parent httpd prozess deals with incoming TCP connect and spreads the > > load across the idle child httpd within the scoreb

Re: Apache corrupt big file

> ok, I may hit a try. Can you tell me if she posted some explanation > about the fixes/changes in the mailing list? I'd like to know what she > did in front. Absolutely... http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2003-q1/msg00153.html (the cvs-commit info) http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-01/msg

Re: Setup hangs repetedly

Martin Magnusson wrote: > Max Bowsher wrote: > > Does it hang in the middle of installing a package, or between > > packages? > It varies. Now I have actually managed to install the basic Cygwin > packages (everything set to default, no compilers or anything). It > worked on the second attempt. B

Re: Apache corrupt big file

> thanks! > > Stipe No probs! ;-) Just hope that was what was holding apache back -) Regards, Elfyn McBratney [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.exposure.org.uk -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation:

Re: installing pinfo

Robert Mark Bram wrote: > I downloaded pinfo recently because I have heard it is a better help > program than man. I ran the cygwin setup program, selected pinfo and > thought it ran through ok. However, when I type "pinfo", the command > is not known: > > $ pinfo > bash: pinfo: command not found

bug: fork, LoadLibrary, Windows ME

Hi, I'm trying to debug a problem with Octave running under Cygwin for Windows ME. Every time I fork, I get a message box for each dynamically loaded dll saying: Octave has caused an error in SUB.DLL Octave will now close. This does not happen in Windows 2000. The following code demonstrates

RE: manuals for newbies?

> Since I'm totally new to cygwin, (I just installed it > a couple of days ago) it turns out that I had a lot of > questions while getting familiar with it. I hate > asking them here cause I believe they are very simple > questions and probably lots of people had the same > questions before. But th

Re: Cygwin Compile of NetBSD 1.6

Christos wrote: I am attempting to compile NetBSD 1.6 via Cygwin 1.3.19-1 (on Win2k) by issuing the following command: ./build.sh -m shark -u -t I get the following error: $ ./build.sh -m shark -u -t ===> Bootstrapping nbmake checking for sh... /usr/bin/sh checking for gc

Re: Cygwin Compile of NetBSD 1.6

> So, what appears to be happening is that the build.sh script is > recoginizing "cc" when checking for "gcc". Cygwin does not appear to > recognize "cc" as a compiler on it - attempted test compiles with the > "cc" comand. Without changing anything in the build scripts, is there an > easy way

Re: Cygwin Compile of NetBSD 1.6

Elfyn McBratney wrote: >> So, what appears to be happening is that the build.sh script is >> recoginizing "cc" when checking for "gcc". Cygwin does not appear to >> recognize "cc" as a compiler on it - attempted test compiles with the >> "cc" comand. Without changing anything in the build scripts,

Re: cygwin Compile of NetBSD 1.6

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 07:03:20PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: >Elfyn McBratney wrote: >>>So, what appears to be happening is that the build.sh script is >>>recoginizing "cc" when checking for "gcc". Cygwin does not appear to >>>recognize "cc" as a compiler on it - attempted test compiles with the >

bison-1.875-1 generates code incompatible with g++

(Ran into this when building setup) bison 1.875 produces this code fragment: | yyerrlab1: | | /* Suppress GCC warning that yyerrlab1 is unused when no action | invokes YYERROR. */ | #if defined (__GNUC_MINOR__) && 2093 <= (__GNUC__ * 1000 + __GNUC_MINOR__) | __attribute__ ((__unused__))

RE: installing pinfo

Howdy Max! > Run: > > $ ls -l /bin/pinfo > $ cygcheck -c pinfo > > Post the output of those 2 commands here, and we'll try to help. $ ls -l /bin/pinfo ls: /bin/pinfo: No such file or directory $ cygcheck -c pinfo Cygwin Package Information Package Version pinfo 0.6.6

Re: bison-1.875-1 generates code incompatible with g++

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 07:33:22PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: >(Ran into this when building setup) > >bison 1.875 produces this code fragment: > >| yyerrlab1: >| >| /* Suppress GCC warning that yyerrlab1 is unused when no action >| invokes YYERROR. */ >| #if defined (__GNUC_MINOR__) && 2093

Setup 2.249.2.5, Package 'grep' 2.5-1, missing 'egrep.exe' and 'fgrep.exe'

Hi folks, I used to use one of the Cygwin B packages where the egrep.exe utility was included. I'm on an XP system and I downloaded replacement packages yesterday and ensured that I included the "grep" package. I went to use "egrep.exe" and found it wasn't installed. I did find an egrep.1 bu

Re: installing pinfo

> $ cygcheck -c pinfo > Cygwin Package Information > Package Version > pinfo 0.6.6p1-1 As far as setup (cygcheck) is concerned you have pinfo installed but it's not working (corrupt, unknown?).Double check your path (PATH env. variable) is set-up correctly, just a thought

Re: Setup 2.249.2.5, Package 'grep' 2.5-1, missing 'egrep.exe' and 'fgrep.exe'

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 03:05:07PM -0500, G. Ken Holman wrote: >I used to use one of the Cygwin B packages where the egrep.exe utility was >included. Sigh. >I'm on an XP system and I downloaded replacement packages yesterday and >ensured that I included the "grep" package. > >I went to use "egr

Setup 2.249.2.5, Package 'grep' 2.5-1, missing 'egrep.exe' and 'fgrep.exe'

Hi folks, I used to use one of the Cygwin B packages where the egrep.exe utility was included. I'm on an XP system and I downloaded replacement packages yesterday and ensured that I included the "grep" package. I went to use "egrep.exe" and found it wasn't installed. I did find an egrep.1 bu

Re: Setup 2.249.2.5, Package 'grep' 2.5-1, missing 'egrep.exe' and 'fgrep.exe'

Ken, At 12:05 2003-02-02, G. Ken Holman wrote: Hi folks, I used to use one of the Cygwin B packages where the egrep.exe utility was included. "B" as in beta? b17, b18... One of those? Ancient history and truly the good old days of Cygnus / Cygwin. I'm on an XP system and I downloaded replac

Re: Setup 2.249.2.5, Package 'grep' 2.5-1, missing 'egrep.exe' and 'fgrep.exe'

> I'm on an XP system and I downloaded replacement packages yesterday and > ensured that I included the "grep" package. > > I went to use "egrep.exe" and found it wasn't installed. I did find an > egrep.1 but it just points to grep. The file you are loking for, egrep.exe is no longer in the packg

Re: missing make

> Hi, I need to install CygWin on my pc (running windows 98) but I know > almost nothing of itI've just tried to install all the packages I don't > know why but the file make.exe is missing in my bin directorywhy? what > happened? Not too sure :| For starters, just incase, run

Re: missing make

> what you suggest doesn't work and I've also tried to reinstall ALL > the packages. the file "make.exe" still misses in my bin > directory.. :-( > > does anybody know why? > > I'm posting the output of the "cygcheck -svr" command... be patient ;-) >

Re: Setup 2.249.2.5, Package 'grep' 2.5-1, missing 'egrep.exe' and 'fgrep.exe'

At 2003-02-02 15:25 -0500, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 03:05:07PM -0500, G. Ken Holman wrote: >I used to use one of the Cygwin B packages where the egrep.exe utility was >included. Sigh. I apologize for having taken your time with this to warrant such a

Re: missing make

Also in any follow-up messages where you need to send along your cygcheck output please send it to the mailing list at a plain text *non-compressed* attachment, instead of including the output in the message because it can cause false-positives on the search engine for the archives. :-) R

Re: Setup 2.249.2.5, Package 'grep' 2.5-1, missing 'egrep.exe' and 'fgrep.exe'

> Perhaps ... but I'm not running under bash and never have. Did I miss a > documented restriction that the programs *only* run under bash? It depends on the package. With something like grep you cannot (?) call a egrep from cmd.exe/command.com per se as it is a symbolic link to grep.exe (a windo

Re: Setup 2.249.2.5, Package 'grep' 2.5-1, missing 'egrep.exe' and 'fgrep.exe'

G. Ken Holman wrote: > At 2003-02-02 15:25 -0500, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 03:05:07PM -0500, G. Ken Holman wrote: >>> I used to use one of the Cygwin B packages where the egrep.exe >>> utility was included. >> >> Sigh. > > I apologize for having tak

Re: Setup 2.249.2.5, Package 'grep' 2.5-1, missing 'egrep.exe' and 'fgrep.exe'

Elfyn McBratney wrote: >> Perhaps ... but I'm not running under bash and never have. Did I >> miss a documented restriction that the programs *only* run under >> bash? > > It depends on the package. With something like grep you cannot (?) > call a egrep from cmd.exe/command.com per se as it is a s

[avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1

I've updated libtool-devel to the 20030121 CVS, plus added a major change of my own (inspired by Earnie Boyd and others on the libtool mailing list) that "fixes" the 'relink exe's over and over and over' problem on both mingw and cygwin. [Skip to the last two paragraphs for the real important p

Re: missing make

Also in any follow-up messages where you need to send along your cygcheck output please send it to the mailing list at a plain text *non-compressed* attachment, instead of including the output in the message because it can cause false-positives on the search engine for the archives. :-)

Re: Setup 2.249.2.5, Package 'grep' 2.5-1, missing 'egrep.exe' and 'fgrep.exe'

Max, At 13:12 2003-02-02, Max Bowsher wrote: Elfyn McBratney wrote: >> Perhaps ... but I'm not running under bash and never have. Did I >> miss a documented restriction that the programs *only* run under >> bash? > > It depends on the package. With something like grep you cannot (?) > call a egr

Re: Setup 2.249.2.5, Package 'grep' 2.5-1, missing 'egrep.exe' and 'fgrep.exe'

Randall R Schulz wrote: > Max, > > At 13:12 2003-02-02, Max Bowsher wrote: >> Elfyn McBratney wrote: Perhaps ... but I'm not running under bash and never have. Did I miss a documented restriction that the programs *only* run under bash? >>> >>> It depends on the package. With someth

Re: installing pinfo

On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > > $ cygcheck -c pinfo > > Cygwin Package Information > > Package Version > > pinfo 0.6.6p1-1 > > As far as setup (cygcheck) is concerned you have pinfo installed but it's > not working (corrupt, unknown?).Double check your path

Re: Can't see full list in setup.exe

Hi, I'm trying to find the snapshot setup-2.303 sources, to make a debug build... The released sources (2.249.2.5-1) configure on my system but don't make. I'm following instructions:- >> Try downloading the source for setup and building it from that. >> Since you >> can't see the packages for s

Re: Can't see full list in setup.exe

Colin Harrison wrote: > I'm trying to find the snapshot setup-2.303 sources, to make a debug > build... > The released sources (2.249.2.5-1) configure on my system but don't > make. > > I'm following instructions:- > >>> Try downloading the source for setup and building it from that. >>> Since you

Re: Can't see full list in setup.exe

On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Colin Harrison wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to find the snapshot setup-2.303 sources, to make a debug > build... > The released sources (2.249.2.5-1) configure on my system but don't make. > > I'm following instructions:- > > >> Try downloading the source for setup and building

Re: Can't see full list in setup.exe

Hi, Thanks. I got a build to make for 2.303 using the instructions on http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html And it runs and exhibits the fault on the original prod. machine (of cause it naturally works on my development machine..what doesn't!). I've got the software (XP Pro) and as man

Re: User Guide page out of date

> A note to the maintainer of the User Guide: the "regtool" information on > is out of date (so, for > that matter, is the regtool manpage). For more info, see "regtool > --help". I've fixed this in CVS. For future reference, it would be best t

Re: bash & $PS1 (display error)

> Sorry to but-in :-) > > Now, I havent't been following this thread *bad me* but is the problem that > once you've typed say over 60 characters on the prompt it then starts > overwritting the prompt instead of carrying onto the next line? > > If not, Sorry for buttin-in...I'll but-out now ;-) > >

1.3.19-1:poll bug. Patch included.

Hello, While working on another program (syslogd in inetutils) I found that the poll function was returning POLLERR when something arrived on a UDP socket; it should be return POLLIN. Inside the poll function, recvfrom was returning -1 with errno = EMSGSIZE, but the only error value being che

Re: 1.3.19-1:poll bug. Patch included.

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 06:37:34PM -0800, Peter Rehley wrote: >Hello, > >While working on another program (syslogd in inetutils) I found that >the poll function was returning POLLERR when something arrived on a UDP >socket; it should be return POLLIN. Inside the poll function, recvfrom >was ret

Re: Segmentation fault running JvCreateJavaVM possile bug ?

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 12:05:12 -0500 "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, I don't have time to try this (I don't use gcj) but have you > looked here: > > http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/dll.html > > It's hard for me to tell by the information you've given but I do > see some d

Re: 1.3.19-1:poll bug. Patch included.

Hello, Just to make sure that we are both clear. Change recvfrom so that if the buffer is too small it returns the number of bytes that can be written into the buffer instead of setting errno. Also clear errno since there is no error. Now in poll since we will now be returning the number of

RE: installing pinfo

Howdy Elfyn and Igor, > > As far as setup (cygcheck) is concerned you have pinfo > installed but it's > > not working (corrupt, unknown?).Double check your path (PATH > env. variable) > > is set-up correctly, just a thought before you re-install. If > cygwin (your > > PATH env. variable) is set-up